On Decolonising the Anthropocene: disobedience via plural constitutions

• Published in: Annals of the American Association of Geographers
• Main Author: Jackson, Mark
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: 2020
• Subjects: Afro-Caribbean; Anthropocene; Decoloniality; global environmental governance; Indigenous law; ontology; anishina*
• Online Access: https://hdl.handle.net/1983/0c976ee4-d89e-400d-93a9-b988ced2fcad; https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/0c976ee4-d89e-400d-93a9-b988ced2fcad; https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1779645; https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/files/239199503/Jackson_Anthropocene_Annals_Accepted_2020.pdf

This paper mobilises a decolonial critique of the Anthropocene. It argues for a certain epistemic disobedience to what, conceptually and politically, the Anthropocene seeks to legitimate. The paper counterposes recent critical and global governance epistemologies, which summon the Anthropocene as a new humanist and statist moment for universal politics, against plural, parochial forms of relational, non-statist affirmation. Hegemonic governance imaginaries that invoke universalist and naturalising rationales are shown to reproduce colonial logics. The paper argues for marginalised and systematically ignored forms of earth-bound relationality that evidence long-standing political and ontological means for responding to modernity’s ecological and social harms. Earthbound and rooted life-worlds can affirm ecological responsibility and co-constitution otherwise. Two examples are presented, one from Afro-Caribbean geographies, another from Anishinaabe legal scholarship. Together they evidence enduring ecological reciprocities that unsettle and refuse the totalising rationalities invoked by Anthropocene horizons.