Why is the Number of Premature Deaths Due to Environmental Exposures not Appropriately Quantifiable?
Epidemiological studies and their applications in regulations of hazardous substances (e.g. by WHO, USA, EU) often quantify effects of environmental exposures on populations (burden of disease) by calculating numbers of premature deaths due to exposure. A recent example is the study by Schneider et...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | German |
Published: |
GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/15744/ |
id |
ftubkoeln:oai:USBKOELN.ub.uni-koeln.de:15744 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftubkoeln:oai:USBKOELN.ub.uni-koeln.de:15744 2023-05-15T16:29:34+02:00 Why is the Number of Premature Deaths Due to Environmental Exposures not Appropriately Quantifiable? Morfeld, Peter Erren, Thomas C. 2019 https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/15744/ ger ger GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG Morfeld, Peter and Erren, Thomas C. (2019). Why is the Number of Premature Deaths Due to Environmental Exposures not Appropriately Quantifiable? Gesundheitswesen, 81 (2). S. 144 - 150. STUTTGART: GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG. ISSN 1439-4421 ddc:no doc-type:article publishedVersion 2019 ftubkoeln 2022-11-09T07:15:16Z Epidemiological studies and their applications in regulations of hazardous substances (e.g. by WHO, USA, EU) often quantify effects of environmental exposures on populations (burden of disease) by calculating numbers of premature deaths due to exposure. A recent example is the study by Schneider et al., commissioned by the German Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt), into the burden of disease caused by exposures to nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in Germany. The authors assessed the proportion of premature deaths due to exposure by the Attributable Fraction (AF). However, true numbers of premature deaths caused by NO2 could be much higher or smaller. Indeed, Robins and Greenland showed in 1989 that the AF approach is inappropriate. Despite its far-reaching relevance for epidemiology and public health, their seminal work was not adequately taken into consideration, possibly due to its sophisticated level of mathematical argumentation. Our contribution illustrates - with simple examples - unappreciated but important pitfalls. We recommend that the concept of number of premature deaths be abandoned and years of life lost due to exposure be provided instead, calculated per capita. However, years of life lost due to exposure should not be stratified by age or causes of death (diseases). Furthermore, we show that Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALY) do not provide a meaningful measure to evaluate the effect of environmental exposures on populations. Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland Cologne University: KUPS Daly ENVELOPE(63.761,63.761,-67.513,-67.513) Greenland |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Cologne University: KUPS |
op_collection_id |
ftubkoeln |
language |
German |
topic |
ddc:no |
spellingShingle |
ddc:no Morfeld, Peter Erren, Thomas C. Why is the Number of Premature Deaths Due to Environmental Exposures not Appropriately Quantifiable? |
topic_facet |
ddc:no |
description |
Epidemiological studies and their applications in regulations of hazardous substances (e.g. by WHO, USA, EU) often quantify effects of environmental exposures on populations (burden of disease) by calculating numbers of premature deaths due to exposure. A recent example is the study by Schneider et al., commissioned by the German Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt), into the burden of disease caused by exposures to nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in Germany. The authors assessed the proportion of premature deaths due to exposure by the Attributable Fraction (AF). However, true numbers of premature deaths caused by NO2 could be much higher or smaller. Indeed, Robins and Greenland showed in 1989 that the AF approach is inappropriate. Despite its far-reaching relevance for epidemiology and public health, their seminal work was not adequately taken into consideration, possibly due to its sophisticated level of mathematical argumentation. Our contribution illustrates - with simple examples - unappreciated but important pitfalls. We recommend that the concept of number of premature deaths be abandoned and years of life lost due to exposure be provided instead, calculated per capita. However, years of life lost due to exposure should not be stratified by age or causes of death (diseases). Furthermore, we show that Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALY) do not provide a meaningful measure to evaluate the effect of environmental exposures on populations. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Morfeld, Peter Erren, Thomas C. |
author_facet |
Morfeld, Peter Erren, Thomas C. |
author_sort |
Morfeld, Peter |
title |
Why is the Number of Premature Deaths Due to Environmental Exposures not Appropriately Quantifiable? |
title_short |
Why is the Number of Premature Deaths Due to Environmental Exposures not Appropriately Quantifiable? |
title_full |
Why is the Number of Premature Deaths Due to Environmental Exposures not Appropriately Quantifiable? |
title_fullStr |
Why is the Number of Premature Deaths Due to Environmental Exposures not Appropriately Quantifiable? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why is the Number of Premature Deaths Due to Environmental Exposures not Appropriately Quantifiable? |
title_sort |
why is the number of premature deaths due to environmental exposures not appropriately quantifiable? |
publisher |
GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/15744/ |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(63.761,63.761,-67.513,-67.513) |
geographic |
Daly Greenland |
geographic_facet |
Daly Greenland |
genre |
Greenland |
genre_facet |
Greenland |
op_relation |
Morfeld, Peter and Erren, Thomas C. (2019). Why is the Number of Premature Deaths Due to Environmental Exposures not Appropriately Quantifiable? Gesundheitswesen, 81 (2). S. 144 - 150. STUTTGART: GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG. ISSN 1439-4421 |
_version_ |
1766019270660063232 |