Social Accountability, Medical Schools and a Rural Vancouver Island Community
OBJECTIVE & DESIGN: The purpose of this study is to identify socially accountable principles in the context of a rural Vancouver Island community. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Port McNeill, a rural, North Vancouver Island community, was chosen for the study and intensive interviews were conducted...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
UBC Journal of Family Practice Research and Scholarship
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/familypractice/article/view/186896 |
id |
ftubcjournals:oai:ojs.library.ubc.ca:article/186896 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftubcjournals:oai:ojs.library.ubc.ca:article/186896 2023-05-15T16:15:16+02:00 Social Accountability, Medical Schools and a Rural Vancouver Island Community Anawati, Alex 2015-07-09 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/familypractice/article/view/186896 eng eng UBC Journal of Family Practice Research and Scholarship http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/familypractice/article/view/186896/186305 http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/familypractice/article/view/186896 Copyright (c) 2015 Alex Anawati UBC Journal of Family Practice Research and Scholarship; UBC Research Day 2011 Social Accountability Rural British Columbia info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Interview 2015 ftubcjournals 2023-01-04T07:48:44Z OBJECTIVE & DESIGN: The purpose of this study is to identify socially accountable principles in the context of a rural Vancouver Island community. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Port McNeill, a rural, North Vancouver Island community, was chosen for the study and intensive interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of 12 key stakeholders from the community. METHOD: These interviews were analyzed using elements of grounded theory an eventually categorized in concordance with the definition of social accountability as a theoretical framework. FINDINGS: Socially accountable principles were categorized under 1) Target Population 2) Priority Health Concerns, delineated by: relevance, quality, cost effectiveness, and equity, and 3) Key Stakeholders. Common themes that emerged include: A sense of community that extends beyond the Port McNeill to include the entire North Island region; the marginalization of First Nations and Loggers in an already marginalized region; innovations to the current medical model to include a more holistic approach to health care; and tremendous inequality between First Nations and non-First Nations populations. CONCLUSION: Even with the limitations of the study, the socially accountable principles identified justify the need for further investigation to ensure accountability in the delivery of health care in a very complex and dynamic environment. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations Open Access Journal Hosting (University of British Columbia) McNeill ENVELOPE(78.362,78.362,-68.528,-68.528) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Open Access Journal Hosting (University of British Columbia) |
op_collection_id |
ftubcjournals |
language |
English |
topic |
Social Accountability Rural British Columbia |
spellingShingle |
Social Accountability Rural British Columbia Anawati, Alex Social Accountability, Medical Schools and a Rural Vancouver Island Community |
topic_facet |
Social Accountability Rural British Columbia |
description |
OBJECTIVE & DESIGN: The purpose of this study is to identify socially accountable principles in the context of a rural Vancouver Island community. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Port McNeill, a rural, North Vancouver Island community, was chosen for the study and intensive interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of 12 key stakeholders from the community. METHOD: These interviews were analyzed using elements of grounded theory an eventually categorized in concordance with the definition of social accountability as a theoretical framework. FINDINGS: Socially accountable principles were categorized under 1) Target Population 2) Priority Health Concerns, delineated by: relevance, quality, cost effectiveness, and equity, and 3) Key Stakeholders. Common themes that emerged include: A sense of community that extends beyond the Port McNeill to include the entire North Island region; the marginalization of First Nations and Loggers in an already marginalized region; innovations to the current medical model to include a more holistic approach to health care; and tremendous inequality between First Nations and non-First Nations populations. CONCLUSION: Even with the limitations of the study, the socially accountable principles identified justify the need for further investigation to ensure accountability in the delivery of health care in a very complex and dynamic environment. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Anawati, Alex |
author_facet |
Anawati, Alex |
author_sort |
Anawati, Alex |
title |
Social Accountability, Medical Schools and a Rural Vancouver Island Community |
title_short |
Social Accountability, Medical Schools and a Rural Vancouver Island Community |
title_full |
Social Accountability, Medical Schools and a Rural Vancouver Island Community |
title_fullStr |
Social Accountability, Medical Schools and a Rural Vancouver Island Community |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social Accountability, Medical Schools and a Rural Vancouver Island Community |
title_sort |
social accountability, medical schools and a rural vancouver island community |
publisher |
UBC Journal of Family Practice Research and Scholarship |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/familypractice/article/view/186896 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(78.362,78.362,-68.528,-68.528) |
geographic |
McNeill |
geographic_facet |
McNeill |
genre |
First Nations |
genre_facet |
First Nations |
op_source |
UBC Journal of Family Practice Research and Scholarship; UBC Research Day 2011 |
op_relation |
http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/familypractice/article/view/186896/186305 http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/familypractice/article/view/186896 |
op_rights |
Copyright (c) 2015 Alex Anawati |
_version_ |
1766000977960239104 |