Fuel planning strategies considering operational uncertainties of aerodynamic formation flight

The operational concept of aerodynamic formation flight, also referred to as aircraft wake-surfing for efficiency (AWSE), has high potential in terms of fuel savings and climate impact mitigation. In order to implement this concept, many technological and operational challenges have to be coped with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Swaid, Majed, Marks, Tobias, Linke, Florian, Gollnick, Volker
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8030067
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/9128
https://doi.org/10.15480/882.3386
id fttuhamburg:oai:tore.tuhh.de:11420/9128
record_format openpolar
spelling fttuhamburg:oai:tore.tuhh.de:11420/9128 2023-10-01T03:58:06+02:00 Fuel planning strategies considering operational uncertainties of aerodynamic formation flight Swaid, Majed Marks, Tobias Linke, Florian Gollnick, Volker 2021-03-07 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8030067 http://hdl.handle.net/11420/9128 https://doi.org/10.15480/882.3386 en eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Aerospace 2226-4310 doi:10.3390/aerospace8030067 Aerospace 8 (3): 67 (2021-03-21) http://hdl.handle.net/11420/9128 doi:10.15480/882.3386 2-s2.0-85102955962 CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ false aerodynamic formation flight follower aircraft fuel planning decision-making route optimization flight planning fuel uncertainty aircraft wake-surfing for efficiency 330: Wirtschaft 380: Handel Kommunikation Verkehr 600: Technik 620: Ingenieurwissenschaften Journal Article Other 2021 fttuhamburg https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace803006710.15480/882.3386 2023-09-03T22:13:26Z The operational concept of aerodynamic formation flight, also referred to as aircraft wake-surfing for efficiency (AWSE), has high potential in terms of fuel savings and climate impact mitigation. In order to implement this concept, many technological and operational challenges have to be coped with. As the fuel consumption during a mission strongly depends on a successful execution of AWSE, the existing uncertainties regarding flight planning increase. While a conservative fuel planning ensures a follower to complete the mission even in the case of a formation failure, it might result in high amounts of excess fuel and, therefore, additional fuel consumption. In this study, this issue is addressed by the adaptation of flight planning procedures to the requirements of AWSE focusing on fuel planning in particular, considered from the perspective of a designated follower aircraft of a two-aircraft formation. This trade-off is modeled as an n-action two-event decision-making problem. Each of the possible actions is represented by a combination of mission routing and a corresponding diversion airport, taking atmospheric effects (e.g., wind) into account in order to determine the resulting amount of trip fuel. The two events under consideration are a total formation failure in contrast to a complete success. Based on a scenario with a set of double origin destination pairs characterizing the formations and representative weather patterns for the North Atlantic region, each action is analyzed with regard to the expected fuel consumption and expense. Based on a set of assumed formation success probabilities, we find that the proposed method holds a savings potential to reduce the follower’s fuel consumption by <semantics> 4 . 8 % </semantics> and its monetary expenses by <semantics> 1 . 2 % </semantics> compared with a conventional flight planning. In order to gain a monetary profit margin applying this method, the required formation success probability is shown to vary between <semantics> ... Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic TUHH Open Research (TORE - Technische Universität Hamburg)
institution Open Polar
collection TUHH Open Research (TORE - Technische Universität Hamburg)
op_collection_id fttuhamburg
language English
topic aerodynamic formation flight
follower aircraft
fuel planning
decision-making
route optimization
flight planning
fuel uncertainty
aircraft wake-surfing for efficiency
330: Wirtschaft
380: Handel
Kommunikation
Verkehr
600: Technik
620: Ingenieurwissenschaften
spellingShingle aerodynamic formation flight
follower aircraft
fuel planning
decision-making
route optimization
flight planning
fuel uncertainty
aircraft wake-surfing for efficiency
330: Wirtschaft
380: Handel
Kommunikation
Verkehr
600: Technik
620: Ingenieurwissenschaften
Swaid, Majed
Marks, Tobias
Linke, Florian
Gollnick, Volker
Fuel planning strategies considering operational uncertainties of aerodynamic formation flight
topic_facet aerodynamic formation flight
follower aircraft
fuel planning
decision-making
route optimization
flight planning
fuel uncertainty
aircraft wake-surfing for efficiency
330: Wirtschaft
380: Handel
Kommunikation
Verkehr
600: Technik
620: Ingenieurwissenschaften
description The operational concept of aerodynamic formation flight, also referred to as aircraft wake-surfing for efficiency (AWSE), has high potential in terms of fuel savings and climate impact mitigation. In order to implement this concept, many technological and operational challenges have to be coped with. As the fuel consumption during a mission strongly depends on a successful execution of AWSE, the existing uncertainties regarding flight planning increase. While a conservative fuel planning ensures a follower to complete the mission even in the case of a formation failure, it might result in high amounts of excess fuel and, therefore, additional fuel consumption. In this study, this issue is addressed by the adaptation of flight planning procedures to the requirements of AWSE focusing on fuel planning in particular, considered from the perspective of a designated follower aircraft of a two-aircraft formation. This trade-off is modeled as an n-action two-event decision-making problem. Each of the possible actions is represented by a combination of mission routing and a corresponding diversion airport, taking atmospheric effects (e.g., wind) into account in order to determine the resulting amount of trip fuel. The two events under consideration are a total formation failure in contrast to a complete success. Based on a scenario with a set of double origin destination pairs characterizing the formations and representative weather patterns for the North Atlantic region, each action is analyzed with regard to the expected fuel consumption and expense. Based on a set of assumed formation success probabilities, we find that the proposed method holds a savings potential to reduce the follower’s fuel consumption by <semantics> 4 . 8 % </semantics> and its monetary expenses by <semantics> 1 . 2 % </semantics> compared with a conventional flight planning. In order to gain a monetary profit margin applying this method, the required formation success probability is shown to vary between <semantics> ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Swaid, Majed
Marks, Tobias
Linke, Florian
Gollnick, Volker
author_facet Swaid, Majed
Marks, Tobias
Linke, Florian
Gollnick, Volker
author_sort Swaid, Majed
title Fuel planning strategies considering operational uncertainties of aerodynamic formation flight
title_short Fuel planning strategies considering operational uncertainties of aerodynamic formation flight
title_full Fuel planning strategies considering operational uncertainties of aerodynamic formation flight
title_fullStr Fuel planning strategies considering operational uncertainties of aerodynamic formation flight
title_full_unstemmed Fuel planning strategies considering operational uncertainties of aerodynamic formation flight
title_sort fuel planning strategies considering operational uncertainties of aerodynamic formation flight
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8030067
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/9128
https://doi.org/10.15480/882.3386
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_relation Aerospace
2226-4310
doi:10.3390/aerospace8030067
Aerospace 8 (3): 67 (2021-03-21)
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/9128
doi:10.15480/882.3386
2-s2.0-85102955962
op_rights CC BY 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
false
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace803006710.15480/882.3386
_version_ 1778530551815208960