Index of winter severity and its regional variation in Finland

Winter is considered as an environmental stress that hinders human activity and also makes heavy economic demands. An index of winter severity (Ws) is introduced, based on the following indicators: heating requirement (Hr, day degrees, limit < +12°C), number of hard frosty days (Tmd, limit < ‑...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mansikkaniemi, Hannu
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Geographical Society of Finland 1979
Subjects:
Online Access:https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/9162
id fttsvojs:oai:journal.fi:article/9162
record_format openpolar
spelling fttsvojs:oai:journal.fi:article/9162 2023-05-15T16:53:46+02:00 Index of winter severity and its regional variation in Finland Mansikkaniemi, Hannu 1979-01-01 https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/9162 en eng Geographical Society of Finland https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/9162 Copyright (c) 2014 Fennia Fennia; Vol 157 Nro 1 (1979); 75-87 Fennia - International Journal of Geography; Vol 157 No 1 (1979); 75-87 1798-5617 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 1979 fttsvojs 2020-09-30T22:46:13Z Winter is considered as an environmental stress that hinders human activity and also makes heavy economic demands. An index of winter severity (Ws) is introduced, based on the following indicators: heating requirement (Hr, day degrees, limit < +12°C), number of hard frosty days (Tmd, limit < ‑ 15°C), snow depth (Sdpt). quantity of snowfall (S), number of snow­fall days (Sd, limit > 1 mm), wind speed (ws), number of strong wind days in winter (wMd, limit > 11 m/s), relative humidity (U) and maximum length of night (NiM). The heating requirement is regarded as important as all the other indicators together in the index. The severity of winter can also be measured roughly by a simplified method, Ws' index. The indices show that in spite of strong windchill on open islands winter is easiest in the SW archipelago in Finland as a result of high temperature and small snow­fall. Inconveniences caused by winter are already seen on the S and SW coast, Helsinki–Turku–Pori area; they are 10–15 % greater than in Marie­hamn. In rather a wide area, southwest of the line Helsinki–Tampere–Vaasa, the differences are only locally 25 % higher than in Mariehamn. Inland from the line the disadvantages of winter increase strongly, the indices for Jyvaskylä and Joensuu being 45‑5517c higherthan in Mariehamn. As a result of low temperature and very heavy snowfall the winter is most difficult in the Kuusarno area. The index is 92 % higher than in Mariehamn. In Central Lapland the corresponding difference is 85‑90 % and in southern Lapland and the Inari basin in northern Lapland about 80 %. – Winter is clearly easiest in the most densely populated area. This is a very favourable economic factor in Finland. Article in Journal/Newspaper Inari Lapland Federation of Finnish Learned Societies: Scientific Journals Online Inari ENVELOPE(27.029,27.029,68.906,68.906)
institution Open Polar
collection Federation of Finnish Learned Societies: Scientific Journals Online
op_collection_id fttsvojs
language English
description Winter is considered as an environmental stress that hinders human activity and also makes heavy economic demands. An index of winter severity (Ws) is introduced, based on the following indicators: heating requirement (Hr, day degrees, limit < +12°C), number of hard frosty days (Tmd, limit < ‑ 15°C), snow depth (Sdpt). quantity of snowfall (S), number of snow­fall days (Sd, limit > 1 mm), wind speed (ws), number of strong wind days in winter (wMd, limit > 11 m/s), relative humidity (U) and maximum length of night (NiM). The heating requirement is regarded as important as all the other indicators together in the index. The severity of winter can also be measured roughly by a simplified method, Ws' index. The indices show that in spite of strong windchill on open islands winter is easiest in the SW archipelago in Finland as a result of high temperature and small snow­fall. Inconveniences caused by winter are already seen on the S and SW coast, Helsinki–Turku–Pori area; they are 10–15 % greater than in Marie­hamn. In rather a wide area, southwest of the line Helsinki–Tampere–Vaasa, the differences are only locally 25 % higher than in Mariehamn. Inland from the line the disadvantages of winter increase strongly, the indices for Jyvaskylä and Joensuu being 45‑5517c higherthan in Mariehamn. As a result of low temperature and very heavy snowfall the winter is most difficult in the Kuusarno area. The index is 92 % higher than in Mariehamn. In Central Lapland the corresponding difference is 85‑90 % and in southern Lapland and the Inari basin in northern Lapland about 80 %. – Winter is clearly easiest in the most densely populated area. This is a very favourable economic factor in Finland.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mansikkaniemi, Hannu
spellingShingle Mansikkaniemi, Hannu
Index of winter severity and its regional variation in Finland
author_facet Mansikkaniemi, Hannu
author_sort Mansikkaniemi, Hannu
title Index of winter severity and its regional variation in Finland
title_short Index of winter severity and its regional variation in Finland
title_full Index of winter severity and its regional variation in Finland
title_fullStr Index of winter severity and its regional variation in Finland
title_full_unstemmed Index of winter severity and its regional variation in Finland
title_sort index of winter severity and its regional variation in finland
publisher Geographical Society of Finland
publishDate 1979
url https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/9162
long_lat ENVELOPE(27.029,27.029,68.906,68.906)
geographic Inari
geographic_facet Inari
genre Inari
Lapland
genre_facet Inari
Lapland
op_source Fennia; Vol 157 Nro 1 (1979); 75-87
Fennia - International Journal of Geography; Vol 157 No 1 (1979); 75-87
1798-5617
op_relation https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/9162
op_rights Copyright (c) 2014 Fennia
_version_ 1766044336241246208