The end of the post-Cold War in the Arctic

Trans-boundary cooperation by states, indigenous peoples and sub-national governments as well as region-building in the Arctic region has been so successful that the region is peaceful with high stability. In spite of some disputes on maritime borders, asymmetric environmental conflicts and global p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Heininen, Lassi
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Geographical Society of Northern Finland and the Geography Research Unit 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nordia.journal.fi/article/view/75947
id fttsvojs:oai:journal.fi:article/75947
record_format openpolar
spelling fttsvojs:oai:journal.fi:article/75947 2023-05-15T14:22:47+02:00 The end of the post-Cold War in the Arctic Heininen, Lassi 2011-01-01 application/pdf https://nordia.journal.fi/article/view/75947 eng eng The Geographical Society of Northern Finland and the Geography Research Unit https://nordia.journal.fi/article/view/75947/37322 https://nordia.journal.fi/article/view/75947 Nordia Geographical Publications; Vol 40 No 4: NGP Yearbook 2011: Sustainable development in the Arctic region through peace and stability; 31-42 Nordia Geographical Publications; Vol 40 Nro 4: NGP Yearbook 2011: Sustainable development in the Arctic region through peace and stability; 31-42 2736-9722 1238-2086 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2011 fttsvojs 2021-03-31T22:48:00Z Trans-boundary cooperation by states, indigenous peoples and sub-national governments as well as region-building in the Arctic region has been so successful that the region is peaceful with high stability. In spite of some disputes on maritime borders, asymmetric environmental conflicts and global problems there are neither emerging conflicts nor foreseen reasons for them. Thus, it is possible to argue that the ultimate goal of the Arctic states - to decrease the military tension and increase political stability - has been accomplished. Furthermore, the Arctic states do not acknowledge a world-wide perspective, or take it into consideration, while they see changes, such as globalization, more readily as a threat rather than anything else. However, globalization in the Arctic is actually more an ambivalent process having brought not only negative but also positive impacts, such as recognition of indigenous peoples’ rights, into the region. All this strongly indicates that the post-Cold War period has ended in the Arctic. This article discusses on significant changes in the Arctic region and major challenges of the early-21st century’s Arctic. It first examines the success of the first significant geopolitical change, i.e. the shift from pre to Cold War geopolitics, and then considers the next important and emerging change faced by the Arctic states. Its goal is first to briefly identify the major responses provoked by this change among the Arctic states and then to discuss globalization in the entire region. The paper concludes that at the early 21st century as a geopolitical entity the North plays more important role in world politics. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Federation of Finnish Learned Societies: Scientific Journals Online Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Federation of Finnish Learned Societies: Scientific Journals Online
op_collection_id fttsvojs
language English
description Trans-boundary cooperation by states, indigenous peoples and sub-national governments as well as region-building in the Arctic region has been so successful that the region is peaceful with high stability. In spite of some disputes on maritime borders, asymmetric environmental conflicts and global problems there are neither emerging conflicts nor foreseen reasons for them. Thus, it is possible to argue that the ultimate goal of the Arctic states - to decrease the military tension and increase political stability - has been accomplished. Furthermore, the Arctic states do not acknowledge a world-wide perspective, or take it into consideration, while they see changes, such as globalization, more readily as a threat rather than anything else. However, globalization in the Arctic is actually more an ambivalent process having brought not only negative but also positive impacts, such as recognition of indigenous peoples’ rights, into the region. All this strongly indicates that the post-Cold War period has ended in the Arctic. This article discusses on significant changes in the Arctic region and major challenges of the early-21st century’s Arctic. It first examines the success of the first significant geopolitical change, i.e. the shift from pre to Cold War geopolitics, and then considers the next important and emerging change faced by the Arctic states. Its goal is first to briefly identify the major responses provoked by this change among the Arctic states and then to discuss globalization in the entire region. The paper concludes that at the early 21st century as a geopolitical entity the North plays more important role in world politics.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Heininen, Lassi
spellingShingle Heininen, Lassi
The end of the post-Cold War in the Arctic
author_facet Heininen, Lassi
author_sort Heininen, Lassi
title The end of the post-Cold War in the Arctic
title_short The end of the post-Cold War in the Arctic
title_full The end of the post-Cold War in the Arctic
title_fullStr The end of the post-Cold War in the Arctic
title_full_unstemmed The end of the post-Cold War in the Arctic
title_sort end of the post-cold war in the arctic
publisher The Geographical Society of Northern Finland and the Geography Research Unit
publishDate 2011
url https://nordia.journal.fi/article/view/75947
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
op_source Nordia Geographical Publications; Vol 40 No 4: NGP Yearbook 2011: Sustainable development in the Arctic region through peace and stability; 31-42
Nordia Geographical Publications; Vol 40 Nro 4: NGP Yearbook 2011: Sustainable development in the Arctic region through peace and stability; 31-42
2736-9722
1238-2086
op_relation https://nordia.journal.fi/article/view/75947/37322
https://nordia.journal.fi/article/view/75947
_version_ 1766295303221149696