Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border

This article examines the manner in which the often-mentioned barrier effect of the Finnish-Russian border as well as the greater interaction, enabled by the gradual opening of the border, is perceived among actors involved in cross-border co-operation or border management. The discussion surroundin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laine, Jussi
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Geographical Society of Finland 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/3720
id fttsvojs:oai:journal.fi:article/3720
record_format openpolar
spelling fttsvojs:oai:journal.fi:article/3720 2023-05-15T17:00:19+02:00 Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border Laine, Jussi 2007-01-01 application/pdf https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/3720 eng eng Geographical Society of Finland https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/3720/3511 https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/3720 Copyright (c) 2014 Fennia Fennia; Vol 185 Nro 1 (2007); 49-62 Fennia - International Journal of Geography; Vol 185 No 1 (2007); 49-62 1798-5617 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 2007 fttsvojs 2020-09-30T22:46:00Z This article examines the manner in which the often-mentioned barrier effect of the Finnish-Russian border as well as the greater interaction, enabled by the gradual opening of the border, is perceived among actors involved in cross-border co-operation or border management. The discussion surrounding the impacts of borders on the areas they divide provides the analytical basis on which this article is built. It is a composition of several proposals, which taken together suggest that, first and foremost, borders are barriers for interaction, which have several different roles, some of which are more resistant to change. The empirical data consists of 81 questionnaires, originally collected for the EXLINEA research project from North and South Karelia, in Finland and in the Republic of Karelia and the Leningrad Oblast in Russia. The basic assertion of this article is that despite the benefits gained from its partial opening, the Finnish-Russian border and its side-effects still function as a barrier, separating the two sides from each other and hindering interaction. Given the role that the border plays this is not, however, a purely negative thing. A majority on both sides perceives the border as a necessary and useful institution that is sufficiently transparent to enable the two neighbours to interact in a mutually beneficial manner. Article in Journal/Newspaper karelia* karelia* Republic of Karelia Federation of Finnish Learned Societies: Scientific Journals Online
institution Open Polar
collection Federation of Finnish Learned Societies: Scientific Journals Online
op_collection_id fttsvojs
language English
description This article examines the manner in which the often-mentioned barrier effect of the Finnish-Russian border as well as the greater interaction, enabled by the gradual opening of the border, is perceived among actors involved in cross-border co-operation or border management. The discussion surrounding the impacts of borders on the areas they divide provides the analytical basis on which this article is built. It is a composition of several proposals, which taken together suggest that, first and foremost, borders are barriers for interaction, which have several different roles, some of which are more resistant to change. The empirical data consists of 81 questionnaires, originally collected for the EXLINEA research project from North and South Karelia, in Finland and in the Republic of Karelia and the Leningrad Oblast in Russia. The basic assertion of this article is that despite the benefits gained from its partial opening, the Finnish-Russian border and its side-effects still function as a barrier, separating the two sides from each other and hindering interaction. Given the role that the border plays this is not, however, a purely negative thing. A majority on both sides perceives the border as a necessary and useful institution that is sufficiently transparent to enable the two neighbours to interact in a mutually beneficial manner.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Laine, Jussi
spellingShingle Laine, Jussi
Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border
author_facet Laine, Jussi
author_sort Laine, Jussi
title Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border
title_short Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border
title_full Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border
title_fullStr Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border
title_full_unstemmed Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border
title_sort incommodious border? rethinking the function of the finnish- russian border
publisher Geographical Society of Finland
publishDate 2007
url https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/3720
genre karelia*
karelia*
Republic of Karelia
genre_facet karelia*
karelia*
Republic of Karelia
op_source Fennia; Vol 185 Nro 1 (2007); 49-62
Fennia - International Journal of Geography; Vol 185 No 1 (2007); 49-62
1798-5617
op_relation https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/3720/3511
https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/3720
op_rights Copyright (c) 2014 Fennia
_version_ 1766052965269897216