Comparing predation on forest grouse nests by avian and mammalian predators in two contrasting boreal forest landscapes by the use of artificial nests

Egg predation is an important determinant of breeding success among boreal forest grouse, but the relative roles ofmammalian and avian predators are poorly known. During spring/early summer of 2010, predation on artificial nests was studied by placing nests on the ground and on 1.5-m tall poles at t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wegge, Per, Ingul, Halvor, Pollen, Vebjörn, Halvorsrud, Emil, Sivkov, Andrey V., Hjeljord, Olav
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BirdLife Finland 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133802
id fttsvojs:oai:journal.fi:article/133802
record_format openpolar
spelling fttsvojs:oai:journal.fi:article/133802 2023-09-05T13:21:51+02:00 Comparing predation on forest grouse nests by avian and mammalian predators in two contrasting boreal forest landscapes by the use of artificial nests Wegge, Per Ingul, Halvor Pollen, Vebjörn Halvorsrud, Emil Sivkov, Andrey V. Hjeljord, Olav 2012-09-30 application/pdf https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133802 eng eng BirdLife Finland https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133802/82353 https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133802 Ornis Fennica; Vol 89 Nro 3 (2012); 145–156 Ornis Fennica; Vol. 89 No. 3 (2012); 145–156 0030-5685 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 2012 fttsvojs 2023-08-23T23:03:09Z Egg predation is an important determinant of breeding success among boreal forest grouse, but the relative roles ofmammalian and avian predators are poorly known. During spring/early summer of 2010, predation on artificial nests was studied by placing nests on the ground and on 1.5-m tall poles at two forested areas. One study site was highly fragmented due to intensive forestry (Varaldskogen, Norway) and the other site was a pristine, natural forest in north-western Russia (Pinega Forest Reserve). The nests on poles were subject to predation by birds and those on the ground by both mammals and birds. Total predationwas significantly higher inVaraldskogen than in Pinega. Ground nests suffered ca. 2.5 times higher losses than nests on poles. In Pinega, predation did not differ between the two nest types. The difference between the two areas was probably due to different predator guilds:mammalian generalist predators, such as theRed Fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Badger (Meles meles), were common in Varaldskogen but scarce or absent in Pinega. Canopy cover explained most of the variation in predation rate in Varaldskogen, but no significant relationship with canopy or nest concealment was detected in Pinega. Predation on pole nests varied across habitat types in a similarmanner at the two areas, but predation on ground nests did not. As Raven (Corvus corax) and Hooded Crow (Corvus corone cornix)were rare in both areas, these findings suggest similar searching and predatory behaviour of the two main (smaller) corvids, the Eurasian Jay (Garrulus glandarius) in Varaldskogen and the Siberian Jay (Perisoreus infaustus) in Pinega. Although the study design allowed a comparison between avian andmammalian nest predators, the lack of a clearer relationship between predation and certain variables suggests that nest predation is a complex process involving components of predator behaviour. Article in Journal/Newspaper North-Western Russia Federation of Finnish Learned Societies: Scientific Journals Online Norway Pinega ENVELOPE(41.909,41.909,64.134,64.134)
institution Open Polar
collection Federation of Finnish Learned Societies: Scientific Journals Online
op_collection_id fttsvojs
language English
description Egg predation is an important determinant of breeding success among boreal forest grouse, but the relative roles ofmammalian and avian predators are poorly known. During spring/early summer of 2010, predation on artificial nests was studied by placing nests on the ground and on 1.5-m tall poles at two forested areas. One study site was highly fragmented due to intensive forestry (Varaldskogen, Norway) and the other site was a pristine, natural forest in north-western Russia (Pinega Forest Reserve). The nests on poles were subject to predation by birds and those on the ground by both mammals and birds. Total predationwas significantly higher inVaraldskogen than in Pinega. Ground nests suffered ca. 2.5 times higher losses than nests on poles. In Pinega, predation did not differ between the two nest types. The difference between the two areas was probably due to different predator guilds:mammalian generalist predators, such as theRed Fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Badger (Meles meles), were common in Varaldskogen but scarce or absent in Pinega. Canopy cover explained most of the variation in predation rate in Varaldskogen, but no significant relationship with canopy or nest concealment was detected in Pinega. Predation on pole nests varied across habitat types in a similarmanner at the two areas, but predation on ground nests did not. As Raven (Corvus corax) and Hooded Crow (Corvus corone cornix)were rare in both areas, these findings suggest similar searching and predatory behaviour of the two main (smaller) corvids, the Eurasian Jay (Garrulus glandarius) in Varaldskogen and the Siberian Jay (Perisoreus infaustus) in Pinega. Although the study design allowed a comparison between avian andmammalian nest predators, the lack of a clearer relationship between predation and certain variables suggests that nest predation is a complex process involving components of predator behaviour.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Wegge, Per
Ingul, Halvor
Pollen, Vebjörn
Halvorsrud, Emil
Sivkov, Andrey V.
Hjeljord, Olav
spellingShingle Wegge, Per
Ingul, Halvor
Pollen, Vebjörn
Halvorsrud, Emil
Sivkov, Andrey V.
Hjeljord, Olav
Comparing predation on forest grouse nests by avian and mammalian predators in two contrasting boreal forest landscapes by the use of artificial nests
author_facet Wegge, Per
Ingul, Halvor
Pollen, Vebjörn
Halvorsrud, Emil
Sivkov, Andrey V.
Hjeljord, Olav
author_sort Wegge, Per
title Comparing predation on forest grouse nests by avian and mammalian predators in two contrasting boreal forest landscapes by the use of artificial nests
title_short Comparing predation on forest grouse nests by avian and mammalian predators in two contrasting boreal forest landscapes by the use of artificial nests
title_full Comparing predation on forest grouse nests by avian and mammalian predators in two contrasting boreal forest landscapes by the use of artificial nests
title_fullStr Comparing predation on forest grouse nests by avian and mammalian predators in two contrasting boreal forest landscapes by the use of artificial nests
title_full_unstemmed Comparing predation on forest grouse nests by avian and mammalian predators in two contrasting boreal forest landscapes by the use of artificial nests
title_sort comparing predation on forest grouse nests by avian and mammalian predators in two contrasting boreal forest landscapes by the use of artificial nests
publisher BirdLife Finland
publishDate 2012
url https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133802
long_lat ENVELOPE(41.909,41.909,64.134,64.134)
geographic Norway
Pinega
geographic_facet Norway
Pinega
genre North-Western Russia
genre_facet North-Western Russia
op_source Ornis Fennica; Vol 89 Nro 3 (2012); 145–156
Ornis Fennica; Vol. 89 No. 3 (2012); 145–156
0030-5685
op_relation https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133802/82353
https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133802
_version_ 1776202417084301312