Censusing tetranoids by the Finnish wildlife triangle method: principles and some applications

Tetraonid birds are censused in August and in January-March in the Finnish Game triangle scheme, which is based on about 1200 permanent triangle-shaped routes, each 12 km in length . We compared the results of late-summer and winter censuses in order to develop transformations for further use. The s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helle, P., Lindström, J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BirdLife Finland 1991
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133328
id fttsvojs:oai:journal.fi:article/133328
record_format openpolar
spelling fttsvojs:oai:journal.fi:article/133328 2023-09-05T13:20:47+02:00 Censusing tetranoids by the Finnish wildlife triangle method: principles and some applications Helle, P. Lindström, J. 1991-12-31 application/pdf https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133328 eng eng BirdLife Finland https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133328/81874 https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133328 Ornis Fennica; Vol 68 Nro 4 (1991); 148–157 Ornis Fennica; Vol. 68 No. 4 (1991); 148–157 0030-5685 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 1991 fttsvojs 2023-08-23T23:02:39Z Tetraonid birds are censused in August and in January-March in the Finnish Game triangle scheme, which is based on about 1200 permanent triangle-shaped routes, each 12 km in length . We compared the results of late-summer and winter censuses in order to develop transformations for further use. The summer and winter densities were significantly correlated at both the triangle and game district level. When the numbers of observations are compared, the winter figures are on average 20 % of the latesummer figures in the Capercaillie the corresponding figures are 71, 16 and 125 %for the Black Grouse, Hazel Hen and Willow Grouse, respectively . It should be noted that these are not absolute figures and not fully comparable, since the breadth of the census belt is 60 m in August whereas the belt breadth in the winter census is not known. Using transformations obtained in this study, we transformed the old late-summer brood data (1964-85) from southern Finland to relative winter figures, in order to have data comparable to those for southern Soviet Karelia, where actual winter censuses have been made . All the four species have decreased considerably (-65 %) in Finland, whilst the reverse trend is evident for Karelia (relative change during the period +42 %); the figures of the mid 1980s suggest a similar density in Finland and Karelia. The changes in grouse densities partly accord with the predictions based on changes in habitat distribution and (other) human activities in Finland and Karelia. The paper discusses the possibility of deriving estimates of population density from winter census data obtained from a census belt ofunknown breadth, central issues being the basal and lateral detectabilities. Article in Journal/Newspaper karelia* Federation of Finnish Learned Societies: Scientific Journals Online
institution Open Polar
collection Federation of Finnish Learned Societies: Scientific Journals Online
op_collection_id fttsvojs
language English
description Tetraonid birds are censused in August and in January-March in the Finnish Game triangle scheme, which is based on about 1200 permanent triangle-shaped routes, each 12 km in length . We compared the results of late-summer and winter censuses in order to develop transformations for further use. The summer and winter densities were significantly correlated at both the triangle and game district level. When the numbers of observations are compared, the winter figures are on average 20 % of the latesummer figures in the Capercaillie the corresponding figures are 71, 16 and 125 %for the Black Grouse, Hazel Hen and Willow Grouse, respectively . It should be noted that these are not absolute figures and not fully comparable, since the breadth of the census belt is 60 m in August whereas the belt breadth in the winter census is not known. Using transformations obtained in this study, we transformed the old late-summer brood data (1964-85) from southern Finland to relative winter figures, in order to have data comparable to those for southern Soviet Karelia, where actual winter censuses have been made . All the four species have decreased considerably (-65 %) in Finland, whilst the reverse trend is evident for Karelia (relative change during the period +42 %); the figures of the mid 1980s suggest a similar density in Finland and Karelia. The changes in grouse densities partly accord with the predictions based on changes in habitat distribution and (other) human activities in Finland and Karelia. The paper discusses the possibility of deriving estimates of population density from winter census data obtained from a census belt ofunknown breadth, central issues being the basal and lateral detectabilities.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Helle, P.
Lindström, J.
spellingShingle Helle, P.
Lindström, J.
Censusing tetranoids by the Finnish wildlife triangle method: principles and some applications
author_facet Helle, P.
Lindström, J.
author_sort Helle, P.
title Censusing tetranoids by the Finnish wildlife triangle method: principles and some applications
title_short Censusing tetranoids by the Finnish wildlife triangle method: principles and some applications
title_full Censusing tetranoids by the Finnish wildlife triangle method: principles and some applications
title_fullStr Censusing tetranoids by the Finnish wildlife triangle method: principles and some applications
title_full_unstemmed Censusing tetranoids by the Finnish wildlife triangle method: principles and some applications
title_sort censusing tetranoids by the finnish wildlife triangle method: principles and some applications
publisher BirdLife Finland
publishDate 1991
url https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133328
genre karelia*
genre_facet karelia*
op_source Ornis Fennica; Vol 68 Nro 4 (1991); 148–157
Ornis Fennica; Vol. 68 No. 4 (1991); 148–157
0030-5685
op_relation https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133328/81874
https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133328
_version_ 1776201423486189568