Imperative
The paper focuses on Kant’s formulation of the categorical imperative and on some of the paradoxes that different commentators have detected in it. It attempts to respond to these paradoxes by way of a reading of Kant that shifts the fundamental stakes of the formulation of the categorical imperativ...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Slovenian |
Published: |
ZRC SAZU, Založba ZRC
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/4212 |
id |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:ojs.zrc-sazu.si:article/4212 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:ojs.zrc-sazu.si:article/4212 2023-05-15T18:12:40+02:00 Imperative Imperativ Zupančič Žerdin, Alenka 2016-02-07 https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/4212 sl slv ZRC SAZU, Založba ZRC https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/4212 undefined Filozofski vestnik; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2013): Transformations of Modern Thought, On China, Grosseteste Filozofski vestnik; Letn. 34 Št. 1 (2013): Transformacije moderne misli, O Kitajski, Grosseteste 1581-1239 0353-4510 categorical imperative being absolute real non-realised kategorični imperativ bit absolut realno nerealizirano phil archi Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2016 fttriple 2023-01-22T18:04:50Z The paper focuses on Kant’s formulation of the categorical imperative and on some of the paradoxes that different commentators have detected in it. It attempts to respond to these paradoxes by way of a reading of Kant that shifts the fundamental stakes of the formulation of the categorical imperative. It reads this formulation not as a criterion or test of morality, but as the inscription or formula of its paradoxical ontological (non)status. The impossibility of the moral dimension appearing in empirical reality as one positive entity among others is thus read as an ontological crack in empirical reality itself, that is to say, as its “real”. From this perspective, the split between what ought to be and what is appears as inherent to what is – as inherent to Being (as not consistent). Prispevek izhaja iz Kantove formulacije kategoričnega imperativa in nekaterih paradoksov, na katere so v zvezi z njim opozorili različni interpreti. Na te paradokse odgovarja z interpretativnim poskusom, ki premesti same zastavke formulacije kategoričnega imperativa. Premesti tako, da te formulacije ne bere kot kriterija ali testa moralnosti, temveč kot zapis, formulo njenega paradoksnega ontološkega (ne)statusa. Nemožnost moralnosti, da bi v realnosti nastopala enostavno kot pozitivna entiteta med drugimi, tako bere kot ontološko razpoko same empirične realnosti, kot njeno »realno«. V tej perspektivi se razcep med bitjo in najstvom pokaže notranji sami biti (kot nekonsistentni). Article in Journal/Newspaper sami Unknown |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
fttriple |
language |
Slovenian |
topic |
categorical imperative being absolute real non-realised kategorični imperativ bit absolut realno nerealizirano phil archi |
spellingShingle |
categorical imperative being absolute real non-realised kategorični imperativ bit absolut realno nerealizirano phil archi Zupančič Žerdin, Alenka Imperative |
topic_facet |
categorical imperative being absolute real non-realised kategorični imperativ bit absolut realno nerealizirano phil archi |
description |
The paper focuses on Kant’s formulation of the categorical imperative and on some of the paradoxes that different commentators have detected in it. It attempts to respond to these paradoxes by way of a reading of Kant that shifts the fundamental stakes of the formulation of the categorical imperative. It reads this formulation not as a criterion or test of morality, but as the inscription or formula of its paradoxical ontological (non)status. The impossibility of the moral dimension appearing in empirical reality as one positive entity among others is thus read as an ontological crack in empirical reality itself, that is to say, as its “real”. From this perspective, the split between what ought to be and what is appears as inherent to what is – as inherent to Being (as not consistent). Prispevek izhaja iz Kantove formulacije kategoričnega imperativa in nekaterih paradoksov, na katere so v zvezi z njim opozorili različni interpreti. Na te paradokse odgovarja z interpretativnim poskusom, ki premesti same zastavke formulacije kategoričnega imperativa. Premesti tako, da te formulacije ne bere kot kriterija ali testa moralnosti, temveč kot zapis, formulo njenega paradoksnega ontološkega (ne)statusa. Nemožnost moralnosti, da bi v realnosti nastopala enostavno kot pozitivna entiteta med drugimi, tako bere kot ontološko razpoko same empirične realnosti, kot njeno »realno«. V tej perspektivi se razcep med bitjo in najstvom pokaže notranji sami biti (kot nekonsistentni). |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Zupančič Žerdin, Alenka |
author_facet |
Zupančič Žerdin, Alenka |
author_sort |
Zupančič Žerdin, Alenka |
title |
Imperative |
title_short |
Imperative |
title_full |
Imperative |
title_fullStr |
Imperative |
title_full_unstemmed |
Imperative |
title_sort |
imperative |
publisher |
ZRC SAZU, Založba ZRC |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/4212 |
genre |
sami |
genre_facet |
sami |
op_source |
Filozofski vestnik; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2013): Transformations of Modern Thought, On China, Grosseteste Filozofski vestnik; Letn. 34 Št. 1 (2013): Transformacije moderne misli, O Kitajski, Grosseteste 1581-1239 0353-4510 |
op_relation |
https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/4212 |
op_rights |
undefined |
_version_ |
1766185175113269248 |