Russia in the Arctic: Development plans, military potential, and conflict prevention

Russia wants to realise a high degree of self-regulated stability in the Arctic. Moscow considers this necessary for overcoming the many problems and obstacles to development that are linked to its ambitious plans as well as the consequences of climate change. The regression of sea ice is perceived...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul, Michael, Swistek, Göran
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP) 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.18449/2022RP03
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/253246
_version_ 1821802208838025216
author Paul, Michael
Swistek, Göran
author_facet Paul, Michael
Swistek, Göran
author_sort Paul, Michael
collection Unknown
description Russia wants to realise a high degree of self-regulated stability in the Arctic. Moscow considers this necessary for overcoming the many problems and obstacles to development that are linked to its ambitious plans as well as the consequences of climate change. The regression of sea ice is perceived as a loss of security by the Kremlin, which reinforces its traditional siege mentality. Russian foreign policy is shaped by a reflexive priorisation of security policy above all, even in the Arctic region. Moscow tries to guarantee its national security (including economic interests) by using a broad spectrum of military build-up and corresponding strategic initiatives, which include new nuclear weapons systems. Other Arctic states as well as neighbouring countries and NATO consider these efforts a threat. Russia takes a defensive attitude in the Arctic, but it is prepared for rapid escalation in the event of confrontation. Russia's Arctic policy is a part of its strategy for exerting economic and political influence over Europe. Cooperation between its Northern and Baltic fleets is therefore increasingly important to preserve its geostrategic interests, project power and to defend its territory. The Arctic states have to perform a delicate balancing act: they want to secure sea routes and resources but avoid spiralling escalation in the region. The dialogue on military security should be revived in order to contain the consequences of the security dilemma. Opportunities for cooperation do exist, for example on climate and environmental projects, sustainable and environmentally sound energy use, infrastructure, maritime safety and security as well as economic cooperation.
format Report
genre Arctic
Climate change
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
Sea ice
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:econstor.eu:10419/253246
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id fttriple
op_doi https://doi.org/10.18449/2022RP03
op_relation gbv-ppn:1788309839
doi:10.18449/2022RP03
RePEc:zbw:swprps:32022
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/253246
op_rights other
publishDate 2022
publisher Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP)
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:econstor.eu:10419/253246 2025-01-16T20:06:59+00:00 Russia in the Arctic: Development plans, military potential, and conflict prevention Paul, Michael Swistek, Göran 2022-01-01 https://doi.org/10.18449/2022RP03 http://hdl.handle.net/10419/253246 en eng Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP) gbv-ppn:1788309839 doi:10.18449/2022RP03 RePEc:zbw:swprps:32022 http://hdl.handle.net/10419/253246 other ddc:320 scipo hist Report https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_93fc/ 2022 fttriple https://doi.org/10.18449/2022RP03 2023-01-22T19:01:42Z Russia wants to realise a high degree of self-regulated stability in the Arctic. Moscow considers this necessary for overcoming the many problems and obstacles to development that are linked to its ambitious plans as well as the consequences of climate change. The regression of sea ice is perceived as a loss of security by the Kremlin, which reinforces its traditional siege mentality. Russian foreign policy is shaped by a reflexive priorisation of security policy above all, even in the Arctic region. Moscow tries to guarantee its national security (including economic interests) by using a broad spectrum of military build-up and corresponding strategic initiatives, which include new nuclear weapons systems. Other Arctic states as well as neighbouring countries and NATO consider these efforts a threat. Russia takes a defensive attitude in the Arctic, but it is prepared for rapid escalation in the event of confrontation. Russia's Arctic policy is a part of its strategy for exerting economic and political influence over Europe. Cooperation between its Northern and Baltic fleets is therefore increasingly important to preserve its geostrategic interests, project power and to defend its territory. The Arctic states have to perform a delicate balancing act: they want to secure sea routes and resources but avoid spiralling escalation in the region. The dialogue on military security should be revived in order to contain the consequences of the security dilemma. Opportunities for cooperation do exist, for example on climate and environmental projects, sustainable and environmentally sound energy use, infrastructure, maritime safety and security as well as economic cooperation. Report Arctic Climate change Sea ice Unknown Arctic
spellingShingle ddc:320
scipo
hist
Paul, Michael
Swistek, Göran
Russia in the Arctic: Development plans, military potential, and conflict prevention
title Russia in the Arctic: Development plans, military potential, and conflict prevention
title_full Russia in the Arctic: Development plans, military potential, and conflict prevention
title_fullStr Russia in the Arctic: Development plans, military potential, and conflict prevention
title_full_unstemmed Russia in the Arctic: Development plans, military potential, and conflict prevention
title_short Russia in the Arctic: Development plans, military potential, and conflict prevention
title_sort russia in the arctic: development plans, military potential, and conflict prevention
topic ddc:320
scipo
hist
topic_facet ddc:320
scipo
hist
url https://doi.org/10.18449/2022RP03
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/253246