Demonstration of “substantial research activity” to acquire consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty
Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties are entitled to participate in consensus-based governance of the continent through the annual Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings. To acquire consultative status, an interested Party must demonstrate “substantial research activity,” but no agreed mechanism ex...
Published in: | Polar Research |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Norwegian Polar Institute
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v35.34061 https://doaj.org/article/e8c37169c51c4ff4a1a9f7ed9ba62993 |
id |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:e8c37169c51c4ff4a1a9f7ed9ba62993 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:e8c37169c51c4ff4a1a9f7ed9ba62993 2023-05-15T14:06:40+02:00 Demonstration of “substantial research activity” to acquire consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty Andrew D. Gray Kevin A. Hughes 2016-12-01 https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v35.34061 https://doaj.org/article/e8c37169c51c4ff4a1a9f7ed9ba62993 en eng Norwegian Polar Institute 1751-8369 doi:10.3402/polar.v35.34061 https://doaj.org/article/e8c37169c51c4ff4a1a9f7ed9ba62993 undefined Polar Research, Vol 35, Iss 0, Pp 1-12 (2016) Environmental Protocol scientific output geopolitics human impact Antarctic infrastructure bibliometric search geo droit Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2016 fttriple https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v35.34061 2023-01-22T18:33:01Z Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties are entitled to participate in consensus-based governance of the continent through the annual Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings. To acquire consultative status, an interested Party must demonstrate “substantial research activity,” but no agreed mechanism exists to determine whether a Party has fulfilled this criterion. Parties have generally demonstrated substantial research activity with the construction of a research station, as suggested within the Treaty itself. However, this largely demonstrates logistical capacity, rather than research activity, and often results in major and persistent impacts on Antarctic terrestrial environments. Our study found that national investment in Antarctic infrastructure, estimated by the number of bed spaces at stations, was not a reliable indicator of scientific output. Therefore, we investigated metrics to evaluate research activity directly, and identified both the overall number of Antarctic papers and the proportion of national scientific output these represented as meaningful metrics. Such metrics could (1) demonstrate a nation's level of research activity in Antarctica or (2) help Consultative Parties assess the level of research activity undertaken by a Party seeking to acquire consultative status. Our data showed that, even without land-based Antarctic infrastructure, Canada, Denmark and Switzerland may have reasonable grounds to demonstrate “substantial research activity” on a level comparable with existing Consultative Parties. The use of these metrics may help dispel any perceived requirement for the establishment of a research station to reach consultative status, by putting a greater emphasis on generation of scientific research outputs rather than construction of Antarctic infrastructure. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Polar Research Unknown Antarctic Canada The Antarctic Polar Research 35 1 34061 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
fttriple |
language |
English |
topic |
Environmental Protocol scientific output geopolitics human impact Antarctic infrastructure bibliometric search geo droit |
spellingShingle |
Environmental Protocol scientific output geopolitics human impact Antarctic infrastructure bibliometric search geo droit Andrew D. Gray Kevin A. Hughes Demonstration of “substantial research activity” to acquire consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty |
topic_facet |
Environmental Protocol scientific output geopolitics human impact Antarctic infrastructure bibliometric search geo droit |
description |
Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties are entitled to participate in consensus-based governance of the continent through the annual Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings. To acquire consultative status, an interested Party must demonstrate “substantial research activity,” but no agreed mechanism exists to determine whether a Party has fulfilled this criterion. Parties have generally demonstrated substantial research activity with the construction of a research station, as suggested within the Treaty itself. However, this largely demonstrates logistical capacity, rather than research activity, and often results in major and persistent impacts on Antarctic terrestrial environments. Our study found that national investment in Antarctic infrastructure, estimated by the number of bed spaces at stations, was not a reliable indicator of scientific output. Therefore, we investigated metrics to evaluate research activity directly, and identified both the overall number of Antarctic papers and the proportion of national scientific output these represented as meaningful metrics. Such metrics could (1) demonstrate a nation's level of research activity in Antarctica or (2) help Consultative Parties assess the level of research activity undertaken by a Party seeking to acquire consultative status. Our data showed that, even without land-based Antarctic infrastructure, Canada, Denmark and Switzerland may have reasonable grounds to demonstrate “substantial research activity” on a level comparable with existing Consultative Parties. The use of these metrics may help dispel any perceived requirement for the establishment of a research station to reach consultative status, by putting a greater emphasis on generation of scientific research outputs rather than construction of Antarctic infrastructure. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Andrew D. Gray Kevin A. Hughes |
author_facet |
Andrew D. Gray Kevin A. Hughes |
author_sort |
Andrew D. Gray |
title |
Demonstration of “substantial research activity” to acquire consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty |
title_short |
Demonstration of “substantial research activity” to acquire consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty |
title_full |
Demonstration of “substantial research activity” to acquire consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty |
title_fullStr |
Demonstration of “substantial research activity” to acquire consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty |
title_full_unstemmed |
Demonstration of “substantial research activity” to acquire consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty |
title_sort |
demonstration of “substantial research activity” to acquire consultative status under the antarctic treaty |
publisher |
Norwegian Polar Institute |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v35.34061 https://doaj.org/article/e8c37169c51c4ff4a1a9f7ed9ba62993 |
geographic |
Antarctic Canada The Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic Canada The Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Polar Research |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Polar Research |
op_source |
Polar Research, Vol 35, Iss 0, Pp 1-12 (2016) |
op_relation |
1751-8369 doi:10.3402/polar.v35.34061 https://doaj.org/article/e8c37169c51c4ff4a1a9f7ed9ba62993 |
op_rights |
undefined |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v35.34061 |
container_title |
Polar Research |
container_volume |
35 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
34061 |
_version_ |
1766278662694371328 |