Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?

The Icelandic economy has transitioned from being dependent on fishing and agriculture to having tourism and refined aluminum as its main exports. Nevertheless, the new main industries still rely on the country’s natural resources, as the power intensive industry uses energy from rivers and geotherm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability
Main Authors: Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir, C. Michael Hall
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133642
https://doaj.org/article/dda1578f251e4ec8a7b795bf8f2dfc14
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:dda1578f251e4ec8a7b795bf8f2dfc14
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:dda1578f251e4ec8a7b795bf8f2dfc14 2023-05-15T16:51:13+02:00 Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland? Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir C. Michael Hall 2019-07-01 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133642 https://doaj.org/article/dda1578f251e4ec8a7b795bf8f2dfc14 en eng MDPI AG 2071-1050 doi:10.3390/su11133642 https://doaj.org/article/dda1578f251e4ec8a7b795bf8f2dfc14 undefined Sustainability, Vol 11, Iss 13, p 3642 (2019) land use conflicts tourism industry nature-based tourism sustainable power production renewable energy development envir archi Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2019 fttriple https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133642 2023-01-22T18:11:35Z The Icelandic economy has transitioned from being dependent on fishing and agriculture to having tourism and refined aluminum as its main exports. Nevertheless, the new main industries still rely on the country’s natural resources, as the power intensive industry uses energy from rivers and geothermal areas whereas tourism uses the natural landscape, where geysers, waterfalls and thermal pools are part of the attraction to visitors. Although both industries claim to contribute to sustainability they utilize the same resources, and land-use conflicts can be expected, illustrating the contestation that can occur between different visions and understandings of sustainability. This paper focuses on the attitudes of Icelandic tourism operators towards power production and proposed power plants using data from questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. Results show that the majority of Icelandic tourism operators assume further power utilization would be in conflict with nature-based tourism, and they are generally negative towards all types of renewable energy development and power plant infrastructure. Respondents are most negative towards transmission lines, reservoirs and hydro power plants in the country’s interior Highlands. About 40% of the respondents perceive that existing power plants have negatively affected tourism, while a similar proportion think they had no impact. According to the respondents, the two industries could co-exist with improved spatial planning, management and inter-sectoral cooperation. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Unknown Sustainability 11 13 3642
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic land use conflicts
tourism industry
nature-based tourism
sustainable power production
renewable energy development
envir
archi
spellingShingle land use conflicts
tourism industry
nature-based tourism
sustainable power production
renewable energy development
envir
archi
Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir
C. Michael Hall
Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?
topic_facet land use conflicts
tourism industry
nature-based tourism
sustainable power production
renewable energy development
envir
archi
description The Icelandic economy has transitioned from being dependent on fishing and agriculture to having tourism and refined aluminum as its main exports. Nevertheless, the new main industries still rely on the country’s natural resources, as the power intensive industry uses energy from rivers and geothermal areas whereas tourism uses the natural landscape, where geysers, waterfalls and thermal pools are part of the attraction to visitors. Although both industries claim to contribute to sustainability they utilize the same resources, and land-use conflicts can be expected, illustrating the contestation that can occur between different visions and understandings of sustainability. This paper focuses on the attitudes of Icelandic tourism operators towards power production and proposed power plants using data from questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. Results show that the majority of Icelandic tourism operators assume further power utilization would be in conflict with nature-based tourism, and they are generally negative towards all types of renewable energy development and power plant infrastructure. Respondents are most negative towards transmission lines, reservoirs and hydro power plants in the country’s interior Highlands. About 40% of the respondents perceive that existing power plants have negatively affected tourism, while a similar proportion think they had no impact. According to the respondents, the two industries could co-exist with improved spatial planning, management and inter-sectoral cooperation.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir
C. Michael Hall
author_facet Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir
C. Michael Hall
author_sort Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir
title Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?
title_short Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?
title_full Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?
title_fullStr Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?
title_full_unstemmed Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?
title_sort contested development paths and rural communities: sustainable energy or sustainable tourism in iceland?
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133642
https://doaj.org/article/dda1578f251e4ec8a7b795bf8f2dfc14
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Sustainability, Vol 11, Iss 13, p 3642 (2019)
op_relation 2071-1050
doi:10.3390/su11133642
https://doaj.org/article/dda1578f251e4ec8a7b795bf8f2dfc14
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133642
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 11
container_issue 13
container_start_page 3642
_version_ 1766041330426839040