A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model

Two types of optimization methods were applied to a parameter optimization problem in a coupled ocean–sea ice model of the Arctic, and applicability and efficiency of the respective methods were examined. One optimization utilizes a finite difference (FD) method based on a traditional gradient desce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean Science
Main Authors: H. Sumata, F. Kauker, R. Gerdes, C. Köberle, M. Karcher
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2013
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-609-2013
http://www.ocean-sci.net/9/609/2013/os-9-609-2013.pdf
https://doaj.org/article/d41b27d2434b4147826d52b1e3e786b1
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:d41b27d2434b4147826d52b1e3e786b1
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:d41b27d2434b4147826d52b1e3e786b1 2023-05-15T15:07:27+02:00 A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model H. Sumata F. Kauker R. Gerdes C. Köberle M. Karcher 2013-07-01 https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-609-2013 http://www.ocean-sci.net/9/609/2013/os-9-609-2013.pdf https://doaj.org/article/d41b27d2434b4147826d52b1e3e786b1 en eng Copernicus Publications doi:10.5194/os-9-609-2013 1812-0784 1812-0792 http://www.ocean-sci.net/9/609/2013/os-9-609-2013.pdf https://doaj.org/article/d41b27d2434b4147826d52b1e3e786b1 undefined Ocean Science, Vol 9, Iss 4, Pp 609-630 (2013) geo envir Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2013 fttriple https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-609-2013 2023-01-22T17:51:31Z Two types of optimization methods were applied to a parameter optimization problem in a coupled ocean–sea ice model of the Arctic, and applicability and efficiency of the respective methods were examined. One optimization utilizes a finite difference (FD) method based on a traditional gradient descent approach, while the other adopts a micro-genetic algorithm (μGA) as an example of a stochastic approach. The optimizations were performed by minimizing a cost function composed of model–data misfit of ice concentration, ice drift velocity and ice thickness. A series of optimizations were conducted that differ in the model formulation ("smoothed code" versus standard code) with respect to the FD method and in the population size and number of possibilities with respect to the μGA method. The FD method fails to estimate optimal parameters due to the ill-shaped nature of the cost function caused by the strong non-linearity of the system, whereas the genetic algorithms can effectively estimate near optimal parameters. The results of the study indicate that the sophisticated stochastic approach (μGA) is of practical use for parameter optimization of a coupled ocean–sea ice model with a medium-sized horizontal resolution of 50 km × 50 km as used in this study. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Sea ice Unknown Arctic Ocean Science 9 4 609 630
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic geo
envir
spellingShingle geo
envir
H. Sumata
F. Kauker
R. Gerdes
C. Köberle
M. Karcher
A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model
topic_facet geo
envir
description Two types of optimization methods were applied to a parameter optimization problem in a coupled ocean–sea ice model of the Arctic, and applicability and efficiency of the respective methods were examined. One optimization utilizes a finite difference (FD) method based on a traditional gradient descent approach, while the other adopts a micro-genetic algorithm (μGA) as an example of a stochastic approach. The optimizations were performed by minimizing a cost function composed of model–data misfit of ice concentration, ice drift velocity and ice thickness. A series of optimizations were conducted that differ in the model formulation ("smoothed code" versus standard code) with respect to the FD method and in the population size and number of possibilities with respect to the μGA method. The FD method fails to estimate optimal parameters due to the ill-shaped nature of the cost function caused by the strong non-linearity of the system, whereas the genetic algorithms can effectively estimate near optimal parameters. The results of the study indicate that the sophisticated stochastic approach (μGA) is of practical use for parameter optimization of a coupled ocean–sea ice model with a medium-sized horizontal resolution of 50 km × 50 km as used in this study.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author H. Sumata
F. Kauker
R. Gerdes
C. Köberle
M. Karcher
author_facet H. Sumata
F. Kauker
R. Gerdes
C. Köberle
M. Karcher
author_sort H. Sumata
title A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model
title_short A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model
title_full A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model
title_fullStr A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model
title_sort comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2013
url https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-609-2013
http://www.ocean-sci.net/9/609/2013/os-9-609-2013.pdf
https://doaj.org/article/d41b27d2434b4147826d52b1e3e786b1
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Sea ice
op_source Ocean Science, Vol 9, Iss 4, Pp 609-630 (2013)
op_relation doi:10.5194/os-9-609-2013
1812-0784
1812-0792
http://www.ocean-sci.net/9/609/2013/os-9-609-2013.pdf
https://doaj.org/article/d41b27d2434b4147826d52b1e3e786b1
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-609-2013
container_title Ocean Science
container_volume 9
container_issue 4
container_start_page 609
op_container_end_page 630
_version_ 1766338956922716160