AEROsol generic classification using a novel Satellite remote sensing Approach (AEROSA)

Numerous studies (hereafter GA: general approach studies) have been made to classify aerosols into desert dust (DD), biomass-burning (BB), clean continental (CC), and clean maritime (CM) types using only aerosol optical depth (AOD) and Ångström exponent (AE). However, AOD represents the amount of ae...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Environmental Science
Main Authors: Muhammad Bilal, Md. Arfan Ali, Janet E. Nichol, Max P. Bleiweiss, Gerrit de Leeuw, Alaa Mhawish, Yuan Shi, Usman Mazhar, Tariq Mehmood, Jhoon Kim, Zhongfeng Qiu, Wenmin Qin, Majid Nazeer
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.981522
https://doaj.org/article/cb46647640b749709183c1a07c743e21
_version_ 1821596037112922112
author Muhammad Bilal
Md. Arfan Ali
Janet E. Nichol
Max P. Bleiweiss
Gerrit de Leeuw
Alaa Mhawish
Yuan Shi
Usman Mazhar
Tariq Mehmood
Jhoon Kim
Zhongfeng Qiu
Wenmin Qin
Majid Nazeer
author_facet Muhammad Bilal
Md. Arfan Ali
Janet E. Nichol
Max P. Bleiweiss
Gerrit de Leeuw
Alaa Mhawish
Yuan Shi
Usman Mazhar
Tariq Mehmood
Jhoon Kim
Zhongfeng Qiu
Wenmin Qin
Majid Nazeer
author_sort Muhammad Bilal
collection Unknown
container_title Frontiers in Environmental Science
container_volume 10
description Numerous studies (hereafter GA: general approach studies) have been made to classify aerosols into desert dust (DD), biomass-burning (BB), clean continental (CC), and clean maritime (CM) types using only aerosol optical depth (AOD) and Ångström exponent (AE). However, AOD represents the amount of aerosol suspended in the atmospheric column while the AE is a qualitative indicator of the size distribution of the aerosol estimated using AOD measurements at different wavelengths. Therefore, these two parameters do not provide sufficient information to unambiguously classify aerosols into these four types. Evaluation of the performance of GA classification applied to AErosol Robotic NETwork (AERONET) data, at sites for situations with known aerosol types, provides many examples where the GA method does not provide correct results. For example, a thin layer of haze was classified as BB and DD outside the crop burning and dusty seasons respectively, a thick layer of haze was classified as BB, and aerosols from known crop residue burning events were classified as DD, CC, and CM by the GA method. The results also show that the classification varies with the season, for example, the same range of AOD and AE were observed during a dust event in the spring (20th March 2012) and a smog event in the autumn (2nd November 2017). The results suggest that only AOD and AE cannot precisely classify the exact nature (i.e., DD, BB, CC, and CM) of aerosol types without incorporating more optical and physical properties. An alternative approach, AEROsol generic classification using a novel Satellite remote sensing Approach (AEROSA), is proposed to provide aerosol amount and size information using AOD and AE, respectively, from the Terra-MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) Collection 6.1 Level 2 combined Dark Target and Deep Blue (DTB) product and AERONET Version 3 Level 2.0 data. Although AEROSA is also based on AOD and AE, it does not claim the nature of aerosol types, instead providing information on aerosol amount ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Aerosol Robotic Network
genre_facet Aerosol Robotic Network
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:cb46647640b749709183c1a07c743e21
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id fttriple
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.981522
op_relation 2296-665X
doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.981522
https://doaj.org/article/cb46647640b749709183c1a07c743e21
op_rights undefined
op_source Frontiers in Environmental Science, Vol 10 (2022)
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:cb46647640b749709183c1a07c743e21 2025-01-16T18:39:12+00:00 AEROsol generic classification using a novel Satellite remote sensing Approach (AEROSA) Aerosol generic classification using a novel Satellite remote sensing Approach (AEROSA) Muhammad Bilal Md. Arfan Ali Janet E. Nichol Max P. Bleiweiss Gerrit de Leeuw Alaa Mhawish Yuan Shi Usman Mazhar Tariq Mehmood Jhoon Kim Zhongfeng Qiu Wenmin Qin Majid Nazeer 2022-08-01 https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.981522 https://doaj.org/article/cb46647640b749709183c1a07c743e21 en eng Frontiers Media S.A. 2296-665X doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.981522 https://doaj.org/article/cb46647640b749709183c1a07c743e21 undefined Frontiers in Environmental Science, Vol 10 (2022) MODIS AERONET AOD Ångström exponent aerosol types classification geo Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2022 fttriple https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.981522 2023-01-22T19:11:17Z Numerous studies (hereafter GA: general approach studies) have been made to classify aerosols into desert dust (DD), biomass-burning (BB), clean continental (CC), and clean maritime (CM) types using only aerosol optical depth (AOD) and Ångström exponent (AE). However, AOD represents the amount of aerosol suspended in the atmospheric column while the AE is a qualitative indicator of the size distribution of the aerosol estimated using AOD measurements at different wavelengths. Therefore, these two parameters do not provide sufficient information to unambiguously classify aerosols into these four types. Evaluation of the performance of GA classification applied to AErosol Robotic NETwork (AERONET) data, at sites for situations with known aerosol types, provides many examples where the GA method does not provide correct results. For example, a thin layer of haze was classified as BB and DD outside the crop burning and dusty seasons respectively, a thick layer of haze was classified as BB, and aerosols from known crop residue burning events were classified as DD, CC, and CM by the GA method. The results also show that the classification varies with the season, for example, the same range of AOD and AE were observed during a dust event in the spring (20th March 2012) and a smog event in the autumn (2nd November 2017). The results suggest that only AOD and AE cannot precisely classify the exact nature (i.e., DD, BB, CC, and CM) of aerosol types without incorporating more optical and physical properties. An alternative approach, AEROsol generic classification using a novel Satellite remote sensing Approach (AEROSA), is proposed to provide aerosol amount and size information using AOD and AE, respectively, from the Terra-MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) Collection 6.1 Level 2 combined Dark Target and Deep Blue (DTB) product and AERONET Version 3 Level 2.0 data. Although AEROSA is also based on AOD and AE, it does not claim the nature of aerosol types, instead providing information on aerosol amount ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Aerosol Robotic Network Unknown Frontiers in Environmental Science 10
spellingShingle MODIS
AERONET
AOD
Ångström exponent
aerosol types
classification
geo
Muhammad Bilal
Md. Arfan Ali
Janet E. Nichol
Max P. Bleiweiss
Gerrit de Leeuw
Alaa Mhawish
Yuan Shi
Usman Mazhar
Tariq Mehmood
Jhoon Kim
Zhongfeng Qiu
Wenmin Qin
Majid Nazeer
AEROsol generic classification using a novel Satellite remote sensing Approach (AEROSA)
title AEROsol generic classification using a novel Satellite remote sensing Approach (AEROSA)
title_full AEROsol generic classification using a novel Satellite remote sensing Approach (AEROSA)
title_fullStr AEROsol generic classification using a novel Satellite remote sensing Approach (AEROSA)
title_full_unstemmed AEROsol generic classification using a novel Satellite remote sensing Approach (AEROSA)
title_short AEROsol generic classification using a novel Satellite remote sensing Approach (AEROSA)
title_sort aerosol generic classification using a novel satellite remote sensing approach (aerosa)
topic MODIS
AERONET
AOD
Ångström exponent
aerosol types
classification
geo
topic_facet MODIS
AERONET
AOD
Ångström exponent
aerosol types
classification
geo
url https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.981522
https://doaj.org/article/cb46647640b749709183c1a07c743e21