Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements

Bioboundaries, also called biofences, are deterrents that attempt to exploit certain innate behaviors to exclude wildlife from target areas. We hypothesized that human-deployed scent marks and playbacks of foreign howls could simulate a territorial gray wolf (Canis lupus) pack impinging on a residen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christine M. Anhalt, Timothy R. Van Deelen, Ronald N. Schultz, Adrian P. Wydeven
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Utah State University 2017
Subjects:
psy
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26077/4xzh-8856
https://doaj.org/article/bb99a84bfae143d6a76d78b95d6e1d2e
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:bb99a84bfae143d6a76d78b95d6e1d2e
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:bb99a84bfae143d6a76d78b95d6e1d2e 2023-05-15T15:49:35+02:00 Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements Christine M. Anhalt Timothy R. Van Deelen Ronald N. Schultz Adrian P. Wydeven 2017-02-01 https://doi.org/10.26077/4xzh-8856 https://doaj.org/article/bb99a84bfae143d6a76d78b95d6e1d2e en eng Utah State University doi:10.26077/4xzh-8856 2155-3874 https://doaj.org/article/bb99a84bfae143d6a76d78b95d6e1d2e undefined Human-Wildlife Interactions, Vol 8, Iss 2 (2017) bioboundary biofence canis lupus deterrent human–wildlife conflicts nonlethal rendezvous site territoriality psy envir Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2017 fttriple https://doi.org/10.26077/4xzh-8856 2023-01-22T17:07:25Z Bioboundaries, also called biofences, are deterrents that attempt to exploit certain innate behaviors to exclude wildlife from target areas. We hypothesized that human-deployed scent marks and playbacks of foreign howls could simulate a territorial gray wolf (Canis lupus) pack impinging on a resident pack, thereby causing the resident pack to move. During summer 2010, we deployed a simulated-pack bioboundary near 3 wolf packs in northern Wisconsin and monitored their movements relative to 3 wolf packs experiencing a sham treatment, to control for effects of human presence. We analyzed wolves’ locations (≥1 location per week) and used linear models with mixed effects to examine distance from the rendezvous site as a function of treatment (sham or experimental) and phase of treatment (before or after treatment was initiated), while accounting for variations in individual wolves. We found little evidence that biofences, as configured and deployed in this study, caused wolves to change use of their territory. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus gray wolf Unknown
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic bioboundary
biofence
canis lupus
deterrent
human–wildlife conflicts
nonlethal
rendezvous site
territoriality
psy
envir
spellingShingle bioboundary
biofence
canis lupus
deterrent
human–wildlife conflicts
nonlethal
rendezvous site
territoriality
psy
envir
Christine M. Anhalt
Timothy R. Van Deelen
Ronald N. Schultz
Adrian P. Wydeven
Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements
topic_facet bioboundary
biofence
canis lupus
deterrent
human–wildlife conflicts
nonlethal
rendezvous site
territoriality
psy
envir
description Bioboundaries, also called biofences, are deterrents that attempt to exploit certain innate behaviors to exclude wildlife from target areas. We hypothesized that human-deployed scent marks and playbacks of foreign howls could simulate a territorial gray wolf (Canis lupus) pack impinging on a resident pack, thereby causing the resident pack to move. During summer 2010, we deployed a simulated-pack bioboundary near 3 wolf packs in northern Wisconsin and monitored their movements relative to 3 wolf packs experiencing a sham treatment, to control for effects of human presence. We analyzed wolves’ locations (≥1 location per week) and used linear models with mixed effects to examine distance from the rendezvous site as a function of treatment (sham or experimental) and phase of treatment (before or after treatment was initiated), while accounting for variations in individual wolves. We found little evidence that biofences, as configured and deployed in this study, caused wolves to change use of their territory.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Christine M. Anhalt
Timothy R. Van Deelen
Ronald N. Schultz
Adrian P. Wydeven
author_facet Christine M. Anhalt
Timothy R. Van Deelen
Ronald N. Schultz
Adrian P. Wydeven
author_sort Christine M. Anhalt
title Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements
title_short Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements
title_full Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements
title_sort effectiveness of a simulated pack to manipulate wolf movements
publisher Utah State University
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.26077/4xzh-8856
https://doaj.org/article/bb99a84bfae143d6a76d78b95d6e1d2e
genre Canis lupus
gray wolf
genre_facet Canis lupus
gray wolf
op_source Human-Wildlife Interactions, Vol 8, Iss 2 (2017)
op_relation doi:10.26077/4xzh-8856
2155-3874
https://doaj.org/article/bb99a84bfae143d6a76d78b95d6e1d2e
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.26077/4xzh-8856
_version_ 1766384623650078720