Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements
Bioboundaries, also called biofences, are deterrents that attempt to exploit certain innate behaviors to exclude wildlife from target areas. We hypothesized that human-deployed scent marks and playbacks of foreign howls could simulate a territorial gray wolf (Canis lupus) pack impinging on a residen...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utah State University
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.26077/4xzh-8856 https://doaj.org/article/bb99a84bfae143d6a76d78b95d6e1d2e |
id |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:bb99a84bfae143d6a76d78b95d6e1d2e |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:bb99a84bfae143d6a76d78b95d6e1d2e 2023-05-15T15:49:35+02:00 Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements Christine M. Anhalt Timothy R. Van Deelen Ronald N. Schultz Adrian P. Wydeven 2017-02-01 https://doi.org/10.26077/4xzh-8856 https://doaj.org/article/bb99a84bfae143d6a76d78b95d6e1d2e en eng Utah State University doi:10.26077/4xzh-8856 2155-3874 https://doaj.org/article/bb99a84bfae143d6a76d78b95d6e1d2e undefined Human-Wildlife Interactions, Vol 8, Iss 2 (2017) bioboundary biofence canis lupus deterrent human–wildlife conflicts nonlethal rendezvous site territoriality psy envir Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2017 fttriple https://doi.org/10.26077/4xzh-8856 2023-01-22T17:07:25Z Bioboundaries, also called biofences, are deterrents that attempt to exploit certain innate behaviors to exclude wildlife from target areas. We hypothesized that human-deployed scent marks and playbacks of foreign howls could simulate a territorial gray wolf (Canis lupus) pack impinging on a resident pack, thereby causing the resident pack to move. During summer 2010, we deployed a simulated-pack bioboundary near 3 wolf packs in northern Wisconsin and monitored their movements relative to 3 wolf packs experiencing a sham treatment, to control for effects of human presence. We analyzed wolves’ locations (≥1 location per week) and used linear models with mixed effects to examine distance from the rendezvous site as a function of treatment (sham or experimental) and phase of treatment (before or after treatment was initiated), while accounting for variations in individual wolves. We found little evidence that biofences, as configured and deployed in this study, caused wolves to change use of their territory. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus gray wolf Unknown |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
fttriple |
language |
English |
topic |
bioboundary biofence canis lupus deterrent human–wildlife conflicts nonlethal rendezvous site territoriality psy envir |
spellingShingle |
bioboundary biofence canis lupus deterrent human–wildlife conflicts nonlethal rendezvous site territoriality psy envir Christine M. Anhalt Timothy R. Van Deelen Ronald N. Schultz Adrian P. Wydeven Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements |
topic_facet |
bioboundary biofence canis lupus deterrent human–wildlife conflicts nonlethal rendezvous site territoriality psy envir |
description |
Bioboundaries, also called biofences, are deterrents that attempt to exploit certain innate behaviors to exclude wildlife from target areas. We hypothesized that human-deployed scent marks and playbacks of foreign howls could simulate a territorial gray wolf (Canis lupus) pack impinging on a resident pack, thereby causing the resident pack to move. During summer 2010, we deployed a simulated-pack bioboundary near 3 wolf packs in northern Wisconsin and monitored their movements relative to 3 wolf packs experiencing a sham treatment, to control for effects of human presence. We analyzed wolves’ locations (≥1 location per week) and used linear models with mixed effects to examine distance from the rendezvous site as a function of treatment (sham or experimental) and phase of treatment (before or after treatment was initiated), while accounting for variations in individual wolves. We found little evidence that biofences, as configured and deployed in this study, caused wolves to change use of their territory. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Christine M. Anhalt Timothy R. Van Deelen Ronald N. Schultz Adrian P. Wydeven |
author_facet |
Christine M. Anhalt Timothy R. Van Deelen Ronald N. Schultz Adrian P. Wydeven |
author_sort |
Christine M. Anhalt |
title |
Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements |
title_short |
Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements |
title_full |
Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements |
title_fullStr |
Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements |
title_sort |
effectiveness of a simulated pack to manipulate wolf movements |
publisher |
Utah State University |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.26077/4xzh-8856 https://doaj.org/article/bb99a84bfae143d6a76d78b95d6e1d2e |
genre |
Canis lupus gray wolf |
genre_facet |
Canis lupus gray wolf |
op_source |
Human-Wildlife Interactions, Vol 8, Iss 2 (2017) |
op_relation |
doi:10.26077/4xzh-8856 2155-3874 https://doaj.org/article/bb99a84bfae143d6a76d78b95d6e1d2e |
op_rights |
undefined |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.26077/4xzh-8856 |
_version_ |
1766384623650078720 |