Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry
Since the Greenland Self-Government Act came into force in 2009, economic development and the right to utilize natural resources in Greenland lies in the hands of the Self-Government. Earlier efforts to establish this authority were made back in the 1970s, when discussions on Home Rule were first on...
Published in: | Arctic Review on Law and Politics |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English Norwegian |
Published: |
Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.216 https://doaj.org/article/aabc532761de4de7872a102e0d2df7f5 |
id |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:aabc532761de4de7872a102e0d2df7f5 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:aabc532761de4de7872a102e0d2df7f5 2023-05-15T14:22:39+02:00 Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry Maria Ackrén 2016-05-01 https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.216 https://doaj.org/article/aabc532761de4de7872a102e0d2df7f5 en no eng nor Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 2387-4562 doi:10.17585/arctic.v7.216 https://doaj.org/article/aabc532761de4de7872a102e0d2df7f5 undefined Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2016) public consultation processes deliberative democracy mining Greenland geo envir Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2016 fttriple https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.216 2023-01-22T19:35:55Z Since the Greenland Self-Government Act came into force in 2009, economic development and the right to utilize natural resources in Greenland lies in the hands of the Self-Government. Earlier efforts to establish this authority were made back in the 1970s, when discussions on Home Rule were first on the agenda. Mining industries are not a new activity in Greenland. During the Second World War, Greenlandic cryolite was used to produce aluminum for the North American aircraft industry. Other essential natural resources, such as gold and gemstones, have also received international interest over the years. Greenland's new development aim is to build up a large-scale mining industry. This article elucidates the form of public consultation processes followed in Greenland in connection with two large-scale mining projects and the different views various actors have regarding these events. How did the deliberative democratic process unfold in Greenland regarding these projects? Was the process followed an effective way to manage these kinds of projects? The article shows that two projects that received a lot of media attention: the 2005 iron ore mine project in Isukasia, and the 2001 TANBREEZ-project to extract rare earth elements, used highly different approaches when it comes to deliberative democracy. In the former case, a limited degree of deliberative democracy was used, while in the latter case, the opposite applies. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic review on law and politics Greenland greenlandic Unknown Greenland Arctic Review on Law and Politics 7 1 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
fttriple |
language |
English Norwegian |
topic |
public consultation processes deliberative democracy mining Greenland geo envir |
spellingShingle |
public consultation processes deliberative democracy mining Greenland geo envir Maria Ackrén Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry |
topic_facet |
public consultation processes deliberative democracy mining Greenland geo envir |
description |
Since the Greenland Self-Government Act came into force in 2009, economic development and the right to utilize natural resources in Greenland lies in the hands of the Self-Government. Earlier efforts to establish this authority were made back in the 1970s, when discussions on Home Rule were first on the agenda. Mining industries are not a new activity in Greenland. During the Second World War, Greenlandic cryolite was used to produce aluminum for the North American aircraft industry. Other essential natural resources, such as gold and gemstones, have also received international interest over the years. Greenland's new development aim is to build up a large-scale mining industry. This article elucidates the form of public consultation processes followed in Greenland in connection with two large-scale mining projects and the different views various actors have regarding these events. How did the deliberative democratic process unfold in Greenland regarding these projects? Was the process followed an effective way to manage these kinds of projects? The article shows that two projects that received a lot of media attention: the 2005 iron ore mine project in Isukasia, and the 2001 TANBREEZ-project to extract rare earth elements, used highly different approaches when it comes to deliberative democracy. In the former case, a limited degree of deliberative democracy was used, while in the latter case, the opposite applies. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Maria Ackrén |
author_facet |
Maria Ackrén |
author_sort |
Maria Ackrén |
title |
Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry |
title_short |
Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry |
title_full |
Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry |
title_fullStr |
Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry |
title_sort |
public consultation processes in greenland regarding the mining industry |
publisher |
Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.216 https://doaj.org/article/aabc532761de4de7872a102e0d2df7f5 |
geographic |
Greenland |
geographic_facet |
Greenland |
genre |
Arctic Arctic review on law and politics Greenland greenlandic |
genre_facet |
Arctic Arctic review on law and politics Greenland greenlandic |
op_source |
Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2016) |
op_relation |
2387-4562 doi:10.17585/arctic.v7.216 https://doaj.org/article/aabc532761de4de7872a102e0d2df7f5 |
op_rights |
undefined |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.216 |
container_title |
Arctic Review on Law and Politics |
container_volume |
7 |
container_issue |
1 |
_version_ |
1766295190312583168 |