Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry

Since the Greenland Self-Government Act came into force in 2009, economic development and the right to utilize natural resources in Greenland lies in the hands of the Self-Government. Earlier efforts to establish this authority were made back in the 1970s, when discussions on Home Rule were first on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Review on Law and Politics
Main Author: Maria Ackrén
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Norwegian
Published: Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 2016
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.216
https://doaj.org/article/aabc532761de4de7872a102e0d2df7f5
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:aabc532761de4de7872a102e0d2df7f5
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:aabc532761de4de7872a102e0d2df7f5 2023-05-15T14:22:39+02:00 Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry Maria Ackrén 2016-05-01 https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.216 https://doaj.org/article/aabc532761de4de7872a102e0d2df7f5 en no eng nor Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 2387-4562 doi:10.17585/arctic.v7.216 https://doaj.org/article/aabc532761de4de7872a102e0d2df7f5 undefined Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2016) public consultation processes deliberative democracy mining Greenland geo envir Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2016 fttriple https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.216 2023-01-22T19:35:55Z Since the Greenland Self-Government Act came into force in 2009, economic development and the right to utilize natural resources in Greenland lies in the hands of the Self-Government. Earlier efforts to establish this authority were made back in the 1970s, when discussions on Home Rule were first on the agenda. Mining industries are not a new activity in Greenland. During the Second World War, Greenlandic cryolite was used to produce aluminum for the North American aircraft industry. Other essential natural resources, such as gold and gemstones, have also received international interest over the years. Greenland's new development aim is to build up a large-scale mining industry. This article elucidates the form of public consultation processes followed in Greenland in connection with two large-scale mining projects and the different views various actors have regarding these events. How did the deliberative democratic process unfold in Greenland regarding these projects? Was the process followed an effective way to manage these kinds of projects? The article shows that two projects that received a lot of media attention: the 2005 iron ore mine project in Isukasia, and the 2001 TANBREEZ-project to extract rare earth elements, used highly different approaches when it comes to deliberative democracy. In the former case, a limited degree of deliberative democracy was used, while in the latter case, the opposite applies. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic review on law and politics Greenland greenlandic Unknown Greenland Arctic Review on Law and Politics 7 1
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
Norwegian
topic public consultation processes
deliberative democracy
mining
Greenland
geo
envir
spellingShingle public consultation processes
deliberative democracy
mining
Greenland
geo
envir
Maria Ackrén
Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry
topic_facet public consultation processes
deliberative democracy
mining
Greenland
geo
envir
description Since the Greenland Self-Government Act came into force in 2009, economic development and the right to utilize natural resources in Greenland lies in the hands of the Self-Government. Earlier efforts to establish this authority were made back in the 1970s, when discussions on Home Rule were first on the agenda. Mining industries are not a new activity in Greenland. During the Second World War, Greenlandic cryolite was used to produce aluminum for the North American aircraft industry. Other essential natural resources, such as gold and gemstones, have also received international interest over the years. Greenland's new development aim is to build up a large-scale mining industry. This article elucidates the form of public consultation processes followed in Greenland in connection with two large-scale mining projects and the different views various actors have regarding these events. How did the deliberative democratic process unfold in Greenland regarding these projects? Was the process followed an effective way to manage these kinds of projects? The article shows that two projects that received a lot of media attention: the 2005 iron ore mine project in Isukasia, and the 2001 TANBREEZ-project to extract rare earth elements, used highly different approaches when it comes to deliberative democracy. In the former case, a limited degree of deliberative democracy was used, while in the latter case, the opposite applies.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Maria Ackrén
author_facet Maria Ackrén
author_sort Maria Ackrén
title Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry
title_short Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry
title_full Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry
title_fullStr Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry
title_full_unstemmed Public Consultation Processes in Greenland Regarding the Mining Industry
title_sort public consultation processes in greenland regarding the mining industry
publisher Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.216
https://doaj.org/article/aabc532761de4de7872a102e0d2df7f5
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Arctic
Arctic review on law and politics
Greenland
greenlandic
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic review on law and politics
Greenland
greenlandic
op_source Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2016)
op_relation 2387-4562
doi:10.17585/arctic.v7.216
https://doaj.org/article/aabc532761de4de7872a102e0d2df7f5
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.216
container_title Arctic Review on Law and Politics
container_volume 7
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766295190312583168