Found in translation: identifying ecosystem services through public consultation statements in a marine spatial planning process

There has been a widespread push to incorporate ecosystem services (ES) in research and policy-making, yet ES have remained an expert-driven discourse not well integrated into hands-on planning and management, particularly at the more local levels. We carry out a retrospective investigation of an in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecosystems and People
Main Authors: Bente Sundsvold, Claire W. Armstrong
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1596982
https://doaj.org/article/8ae6c5fc1ae04928b75756fc4ba0c4d4
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:8ae6c5fc1ae04928b75756fc4ba0c4d4
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:8ae6c5fc1ae04928b75756fc4ba0c4d4 2023-05-15T17:43:30+02:00 Found in translation: identifying ecosystem services through public consultation statements in a marine spatial planning process Bente Sundsvold Claire W. Armstrong 2019-01-01 https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1596982 https://doaj.org/article/8ae6c5fc1ae04928b75756fc4ba0c4d4 en eng Taylor & Francis Group 2639-5916 doi:10.1080/26395916.2019.1596982 https://doaj.org/article/8ae6c5fc1ae04928b75756fc4ba0c4d4 undefined Ecosystems and People, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 102-118 (2019) sarah klain envir demo Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2019 fttriple https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1596982 2023-01-22T19:33:51Z There has been a widespread push to incorporate ecosystem services (ES) in research and policy-making, yet ES have remained an expert-driven discourse not well integrated into hands-on planning and management, particularly at the more local levels. We carry out a retrospective investigation of an inter-municipal marine spatial planning (MSP) process in Northern Norway, where the allocation of new aquaculture locations was a core issue. At this local/regional scale, the concept of ES is hardly known. Thus, our approach is to investigate the documents of public consultation, where different stakeholders operating at different scales respond to the proposed planning document. By analyzing and ‘translating’ the consultation statements into the ES nomenclature, we find a rich and diverse basis for ES identification especially at the local level and within cultural and supporting services. More than 208 different ecosystem services were identified, two-thirds of the total number of services at the local scale. This supports the debate in the ES-science community, which has suggested greater inclusion of plural and context-specific perspectives on people’s relationship to the environment. Our findings show that by doing so in MSP, municipal coastal planners may obtain tools that strengthen local democracy and include greater ES diversity and sustainability. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Norway Unknown Norway Ecosystems and People 15 1 102 118
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic sarah klain
envir
demo
spellingShingle sarah klain
envir
demo
Bente Sundsvold
Claire W. Armstrong
Found in translation: identifying ecosystem services through public consultation statements in a marine spatial planning process
topic_facet sarah klain
envir
demo
description There has been a widespread push to incorporate ecosystem services (ES) in research and policy-making, yet ES have remained an expert-driven discourse not well integrated into hands-on planning and management, particularly at the more local levels. We carry out a retrospective investigation of an inter-municipal marine spatial planning (MSP) process in Northern Norway, where the allocation of new aquaculture locations was a core issue. At this local/regional scale, the concept of ES is hardly known. Thus, our approach is to investigate the documents of public consultation, where different stakeholders operating at different scales respond to the proposed planning document. By analyzing and ‘translating’ the consultation statements into the ES nomenclature, we find a rich and diverse basis for ES identification especially at the local level and within cultural and supporting services. More than 208 different ecosystem services were identified, two-thirds of the total number of services at the local scale. This supports the debate in the ES-science community, which has suggested greater inclusion of plural and context-specific perspectives on people’s relationship to the environment. Our findings show that by doing so in MSP, municipal coastal planners may obtain tools that strengthen local democracy and include greater ES diversity and sustainability.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bente Sundsvold
Claire W. Armstrong
author_facet Bente Sundsvold
Claire W. Armstrong
author_sort Bente Sundsvold
title Found in translation: identifying ecosystem services through public consultation statements in a marine spatial planning process
title_short Found in translation: identifying ecosystem services through public consultation statements in a marine spatial planning process
title_full Found in translation: identifying ecosystem services through public consultation statements in a marine spatial planning process
title_fullStr Found in translation: identifying ecosystem services through public consultation statements in a marine spatial planning process
title_full_unstemmed Found in translation: identifying ecosystem services through public consultation statements in a marine spatial planning process
title_sort found in translation: identifying ecosystem services through public consultation statements in a marine spatial planning process
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1596982
https://doaj.org/article/8ae6c5fc1ae04928b75756fc4ba0c4d4
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Northern Norway
genre_facet Northern Norway
op_source Ecosystems and People, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 102-118 (2019)
op_relation 2639-5916
doi:10.1080/26395916.2019.1596982
https://doaj.org/article/8ae6c5fc1ae04928b75756fc4ba0c4d4
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1596982
container_title Ecosystems and People
container_volume 15
container_issue 1
container_start_page 102
op_container_end_page 118
_version_ 1766145597744611328