En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt

Abstract: A Chinese Railway to the Arctic? The Story of Belkomur – so Far The further development of the Northern Sea Route, including the associated logistical chains and infrastructure, enjoys high priority in Russia, and inadequate south–north transportation capacity is recognized as a problem. C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nordisk Østforum
Main Author: Arild Moe
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Danish
Swedish
Published: Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.23865/noros.v35.3122
https://doaj.org/article/7cd5d8bbd7ab4a1a9aa22fe97f4367a7
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:7cd5d8bbd7ab4a1a9aa22fe97f4367a7
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:7cd5d8bbd7ab4a1a9aa22fe97f4367a7 2023-05-15T14:45:36+02:00 En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt A Chinese Railway to the Arctic? The story of Belkomur — so far Arild Moe 2021-09-01 https://doi.org/10.23865/noros.v35.3122 https://doaj.org/article/7cd5d8bbd7ab4a1a9aa22fe97f4367a7 da other sv dan swe Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 1891-1773 doi:10.23865/noros.v35.3122 https://doaj.org/article/7cd5d8bbd7ab4a1a9aa22fe97f4367a7 undefined Nordisk Østforum, Vol 35, Iss 0, Pp 126-143 (2021) russia china railway arctic port infrastructure droit scipo Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2021 fttriple https://doi.org/10.23865/noros.v35.3122 2023-01-22T17:53:59Z Abstract: A Chinese Railway to the Arctic? The Story of Belkomur – so Far The further development of the Northern Sea Route, including the associated logistical chains and infrastructure, enjoys high priority in Russia, and inadequate south–north transportation capacity is recognized as a problem. China has shown increasing interest in Arctic shipping over the past ten years. The construction of a railway from the Urals, with connections to China, to a deep-water port with access to the Arctic Ocean appeared attractive, both as a strategic opportunity for China and as a natural area for Chinese engagement in Russia, given announcements of the close partnership and common interests between the two countries. Since 2012 various Chinese companies have shown interest in investing, and the conclusion of a concession agreement has been announced several times. The Russian federal authorities have voiced support, without committing budget funding. Increasingly, however, critical remarks have been heard from the federal government, although regional support remains strong. As of mid-2021 no firm agreement had been signed, and the project was put on hold. Reviewing the history of the project since Chinese companies were first engaged, this article offers insights on Russian regional authorities’ scope for manoeuvre and the relationship between central and regional power. It also reveals Russian misinterpretations of Chinese interest in the project. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Ocean Arktis Arktis* Northern Sea Route Unknown Arctic Arctic Ocean Nordisk Østforum 35 0 126
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language Danish
Swedish
topic russia
china
railway
arctic
port
infrastructure
droit
scipo
spellingShingle russia
china
railway
arctic
port
infrastructure
droit
scipo
Arild Moe
En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt
topic_facet russia
china
railway
arctic
port
infrastructure
droit
scipo
description Abstract: A Chinese Railway to the Arctic? The Story of Belkomur – so Far The further development of the Northern Sea Route, including the associated logistical chains and infrastructure, enjoys high priority in Russia, and inadequate south–north transportation capacity is recognized as a problem. China has shown increasing interest in Arctic shipping over the past ten years. The construction of a railway from the Urals, with connections to China, to a deep-water port with access to the Arctic Ocean appeared attractive, both as a strategic opportunity for China and as a natural area for Chinese engagement in Russia, given announcements of the close partnership and common interests between the two countries. Since 2012 various Chinese companies have shown interest in investing, and the conclusion of a concession agreement has been announced several times. The Russian federal authorities have voiced support, without committing budget funding. Increasingly, however, critical remarks have been heard from the federal government, although regional support remains strong. As of mid-2021 no firm agreement had been signed, and the project was put on hold. Reviewing the history of the project since Chinese companies were first engaged, this article offers insights on Russian regional authorities’ scope for manoeuvre and the relationship between central and regional power. It also reveals Russian misinterpretations of Chinese interest in the project.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Arild Moe
author_facet Arild Moe
author_sort Arild Moe
title En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt
title_short En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt
title_full En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt
title_fullStr En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt
title_full_unstemmed En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt
title_sort en kinesisk jernbane til arktis? historien om belkomur – så langt
publisher Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.23865/noros.v35.3122
https://doaj.org/article/7cd5d8bbd7ab4a1a9aa22fe97f4367a7
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
genre Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Arktis
Arktis*
Northern Sea Route
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Arktis
Arktis*
Northern Sea Route
op_source Nordisk Østforum, Vol 35, Iss 0, Pp 126-143 (2021)
op_relation 1891-1773
doi:10.23865/noros.v35.3122
https://doaj.org/article/7cd5d8bbd7ab4a1a9aa22fe97f4367a7
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.23865/noros.v35.3122
container_title Nordisk Østforum
container_volume 35
container_issue 0
container_start_page 126
_version_ 1766316991809847296