Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review

There is movement in engineering fields and in Indigenous communities for enhancement of local participation in the design of community infrastructure. Inclusion of community priorities and unique cultural, spiritual, and traditional values harmonize the appearance, location, and functionality of de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:FACETS
Main Authors: Lori E.A. Bradford, Tim Vogel, Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt, Kerry McPhedran, Graham E.H. Strickert, Terrence A. Fonstad, Lalita A. Bharadwaj
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0124
https://doaj.org/article/703168bb989c43abb6ae1d57592e8fbe
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:703168bb989c43abb6ae1d57592e8fbe
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:703168bb989c43abb6ae1d57592e8fbe 2023-05-15T16:16:40+02:00 Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review Lori E.A. Bradford Tim Vogel Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt Kerry McPhedran Graham E.H. Strickert Terrence A. Fonstad Lalita A. Bharadwaj 2018-04-01 https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0124 https://doaj.org/article/703168bb989c43abb6ae1d57592e8fbe en eng Canadian Science Publishing doi:10.1139/facets-2017-0124 2371-1671 https://doaj.org/article/703168bb989c43abb6ae1d57592e8fbe undefined FACETS, Vol 3, Pp 487-511 (2018) co-design water infrastructure Indigenous First Nations Canada demo info Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2018 fttriple https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0124 2023-01-22T19:12:08Z There is movement in engineering fields and in Indigenous communities for enhancement of local participation in the design of community infrastructure. Inclusion of community priorities and unique cultural, spiritual, and traditional values harmonize the appearance, location, and functionality of developments with the social and cultural context in which they are built and contribute to holistic wellness. However, co-design processes that align community values and the technical needs of water facilities are difficult to find. A scoping review was conducted to explore the state of knowledge on co-design of water infrastructure in Indigenous Canada to build a knowledge base from which practices and processes could emerge. The scoping results revealed that articles and reports emerged only in recent years, contained case studies and meta-reviews with primary (qualitative) data, and involved community members in various capacities. Overall, 13 articles were reviewed that contributed to understanding co-design for water infrastructure in Indigenous Canada. Barriers to co-design included funding models for Indigenous community infrastructure, difficulties in engineers and designers understanding Indigenous worldviews and paradigms, and a lack of cooperation among stakeholders that contribute to ongoing design failures. A working definition of co-design for Indigenous water infrastructure is presented. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations Unknown Canada FACETS 3 1 487 511
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic co-design
water infrastructure
Indigenous
First Nations
Canada
demo
info
spellingShingle co-design
water infrastructure
Indigenous
First Nations
Canada
demo
info
Lori E.A. Bradford
Tim Vogel
Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt
Kerry McPhedran
Graham E.H. Strickert
Terrence A. Fonstad
Lalita A. Bharadwaj
Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review
topic_facet co-design
water infrastructure
Indigenous
First Nations
Canada
demo
info
description There is movement in engineering fields and in Indigenous communities for enhancement of local participation in the design of community infrastructure. Inclusion of community priorities and unique cultural, spiritual, and traditional values harmonize the appearance, location, and functionality of developments with the social and cultural context in which they are built and contribute to holistic wellness. However, co-design processes that align community values and the technical needs of water facilities are difficult to find. A scoping review was conducted to explore the state of knowledge on co-design of water infrastructure in Indigenous Canada to build a knowledge base from which practices and processes could emerge. The scoping results revealed that articles and reports emerged only in recent years, contained case studies and meta-reviews with primary (qualitative) data, and involved community members in various capacities. Overall, 13 articles were reviewed that contributed to understanding co-design for water infrastructure in Indigenous Canada. Barriers to co-design included funding models for Indigenous community infrastructure, difficulties in engineers and designers understanding Indigenous worldviews and paradigms, and a lack of cooperation among stakeholders that contribute to ongoing design failures. A working definition of co-design for Indigenous water infrastructure is presented.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lori E.A. Bradford
Tim Vogel
Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt
Kerry McPhedran
Graham E.H. Strickert
Terrence A. Fonstad
Lalita A. Bharadwaj
author_facet Lori E.A. Bradford
Tim Vogel
Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt
Kerry McPhedran
Graham E.H. Strickert
Terrence A. Fonstad
Lalita A. Bharadwaj
author_sort Lori E.A. Bradford
title Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review
title_short Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review
title_full Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review
title_fullStr Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review
title_sort co-design of water services and infrastructure for indigenous canada: a scoping review
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0124
https://doaj.org/article/703168bb989c43abb6ae1d57592e8fbe
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source FACETS, Vol 3, Pp 487-511 (2018)
op_relation doi:10.1139/facets-2017-0124
2371-1671
https://doaj.org/article/703168bb989c43abb6ae1d57592e8fbe
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0124
container_title FACETS
container_volume 3
container_issue 1
container_start_page 487
op_container_end_page 511
_version_ 1766002529151221760