Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review
There is movement in engineering fields and in Indigenous communities for enhancement of local participation in the design of community infrastructure. Inclusion of community priorities and unique cultural, spiritual, and traditional values harmonize the appearance, location, and functionality of de...
Published in: | FACETS |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Canadian Science Publishing
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0124 https://doaj.org/article/703168bb989c43abb6ae1d57592e8fbe |
id |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:703168bb989c43abb6ae1d57592e8fbe |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:703168bb989c43abb6ae1d57592e8fbe 2023-05-15T16:16:40+02:00 Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review Lori E.A. Bradford Tim Vogel Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt Kerry McPhedran Graham E.H. Strickert Terrence A. Fonstad Lalita A. Bharadwaj 2018-04-01 https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0124 https://doaj.org/article/703168bb989c43abb6ae1d57592e8fbe en eng Canadian Science Publishing doi:10.1139/facets-2017-0124 2371-1671 https://doaj.org/article/703168bb989c43abb6ae1d57592e8fbe undefined FACETS, Vol 3, Pp 487-511 (2018) co-design water infrastructure Indigenous First Nations Canada demo info Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2018 fttriple https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0124 2023-01-22T19:12:08Z There is movement in engineering fields and in Indigenous communities for enhancement of local participation in the design of community infrastructure. Inclusion of community priorities and unique cultural, spiritual, and traditional values harmonize the appearance, location, and functionality of developments with the social and cultural context in which they are built and contribute to holistic wellness. However, co-design processes that align community values and the technical needs of water facilities are difficult to find. A scoping review was conducted to explore the state of knowledge on co-design of water infrastructure in Indigenous Canada to build a knowledge base from which practices and processes could emerge. The scoping results revealed that articles and reports emerged only in recent years, contained case studies and meta-reviews with primary (qualitative) data, and involved community members in various capacities. Overall, 13 articles were reviewed that contributed to understanding co-design for water infrastructure in Indigenous Canada. Barriers to co-design included funding models for Indigenous community infrastructure, difficulties in engineers and designers understanding Indigenous worldviews and paradigms, and a lack of cooperation among stakeholders that contribute to ongoing design failures. A working definition of co-design for Indigenous water infrastructure is presented. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations Unknown Canada FACETS 3 1 487 511 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
fttriple |
language |
English |
topic |
co-design water infrastructure Indigenous First Nations Canada demo info |
spellingShingle |
co-design water infrastructure Indigenous First Nations Canada demo info Lori E.A. Bradford Tim Vogel Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt Kerry McPhedran Graham E.H. Strickert Terrence A. Fonstad Lalita A. Bharadwaj Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review |
topic_facet |
co-design water infrastructure Indigenous First Nations Canada demo info |
description |
There is movement in engineering fields and in Indigenous communities for enhancement of local participation in the design of community infrastructure. Inclusion of community priorities and unique cultural, spiritual, and traditional values harmonize the appearance, location, and functionality of developments with the social and cultural context in which they are built and contribute to holistic wellness. However, co-design processes that align community values and the technical needs of water facilities are difficult to find. A scoping review was conducted to explore the state of knowledge on co-design of water infrastructure in Indigenous Canada to build a knowledge base from which practices and processes could emerge. The scoping results revealed that articles and reports emerged only in recent years, contained case studies and meta-reviews with primary (qualitative) data, and involved community members in various capacities. Overall, 13 articles were reviewed that contributed to understanding co-design for water infrastructure in Indigenous Canada. Barriers to co-design included funding models for Indigenous community infrastructure, difficulties in engineers and designers understanding Indigenous worldviews and paradigms, and a lack of cooperation among stakeholders that contribute to ongoing design failures. A working definition of co-design for Indigenous water infrastructure is presented. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Lori E.A. Bradford Tim Vogel Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt Kerry McPhedran Graham E.H. Strickert Terrence A. Fonstad Lalita A. Bharadwaj |
author_facet |
Lori E.A. Bradford Tim Vogel Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt Kerry McPhedran Graham E.H. Strickert Terrence A. Fonstad Lalita A. Bharadwaj |
author_sort |
Lori E.A. Bradford |
title |
Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review |
title_short |
Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review |
title_full |
Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review |
title_fullStr |
Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Co-design of water services and infrastructure for Indigenous Canada: A scoping review |
title_sort |
co-design of water services and infrastructure for indigenous canada: a scoping review |
publisher |
Canadian Science Publishing |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0124 https://doaj.org/article/703168bb989c43abb6ae1d57592e8fbe |
geographic |
Canada |
geographic_facet |
Canada |
genre |
First Nations |
genre_facet |
First Nations |
op_source |
FACETS, Vol 3, Pp 487-511 (2018) |
op_relation |
doi:10.1139/facets-2017-0124 2371-1671 https://doaj.org/article/703168bb989c43abb6ae1d57592e8fbe |
op_rights |
undefined |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0124 |
container_title |
FACETS |
container_volume |
3 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
487 |
op_container_end_page |
511 |
_version_ |
1766002529151221760 |