The Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami II Case and the Protection of Indigenous Peoples' Rights: A Missed Opportunity?

(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2016 1(1), 307-318 | European Forum Insight of 16 April 2016 | (Table of Contents) I. The Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami saga: in a nutshell. - II. The legal effects of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in the EU...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Simone Vezzani
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Spanish
French
Italian
Published: European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/26
https://doaj.org/article/62f6621b130046fd98337f5052a11934
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:62f6621b130046fd98337f5052a11934
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:62f6621b130046fd98337f5052a11934 2023-05-15T16:54:55+02:00 The Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami II Case and the Protection of Indigenous Peoples' Rights: A Missed Opportunity? Simone Vezzani 2016-04-01 https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/26 https://doaj.org/article/62f6621b130046fd98337f5052a11934 en es fr it eng spa fre ita European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) 2499-8249 doi:10.15166/2499-8249/26 https://doaj.org/article/62f6621b130046fd98337f5052a11934 undefined European Papers, Vol 2016 1, Iss 1, Pp 307-318 (2016) un declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples customary international law trade in seals products right to property legitimate expectations droit scipo Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2016 fttriple https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/26 2023-01-22T19:36:09Z (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2016 1(1), 307-318 | European Forum Insight of 16 April 2016 | (Table of Contents) I. The Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami saga: in a nutshell. - II. The legal effects of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in the EU legal order. - III. Indigenous communities' right to property and its protection under EU law. - IV. Conclusion. | (Abstract) On 3 September 2015 the EU Court of Justice dismissed the appeal against the judgment of 25 April 2013, case T-526/10, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami et al. II, in which the General Court had refused to declare the invalidity of the basic Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 on trade in seal products pursuant to Art. 277 TFUE. Among the issues involved in the case were the legal value under EU law of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the protection of the appellant indigenous communities' economic interests by the guarantee accorded to the right to property. Overall, the case reveals a lack of sensitivity of the EU judiciary towards advancing the rights of indigenous peoples and favouring the progressive development of international law in this field. Article in Journal/Newspaper inuit Unknown
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
Spanish
French
Italian
topic un declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples
customary international law
trade in seals products
right to property
legitimate expectations
droit
scipo
spellingShingle un declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples
customary international law
trade in seals products
right to property
legitimate expectations
droit
scipo
Simone Vezzani
The Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami II Case and the Protection of Indigenous Peoples' Rights: A Missed Opportunity?
topic_facet un declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples
customary international law
trade in seals products
right to property
legitimate expectations
droit
scipo
description (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2016 1(1), 307-318 | European Forum Insight of 16 April 2016 | (Table of Contents) I. The Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami saga: in a nutshell. - II. The legal effects of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in the EU legal order. - III. Indigenous communities' right to property and its protection under EU law. - IV. Conclusion. | (Abstract) On 3 September 2015 the EU Court of Justice dismissed the appeal against the judgment of 25 April 2013, case T-526/10, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami et al. II, in which the General Court had refused to declare the invalidity of the basic Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 on trade in seal products pursuant to Art. 277 TFUE. Among the issues involved in the case were the legal value under EU law of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the protection of the appellant indigenous communities' economic interests by the guarantee accorded to the right to property. Overall, the case reveals a lack of sensitivity of the EU judiciary towards advancing the rights of indigenous peoples and favouring the progressive development of international law in this field.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Simone Vezzani
author_facet Simone Vezzani
author_sort Simone Vezzani
title The Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami II Case and the Protection of Indigenous Peoples' Rights: A Missed Opportunity?
title_short The Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami II Case and the Protection of Indigenous Peoples' Rights: A Missed Opportunity?
title_full The Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami II Case and the Protection of Indigenous Peoples' Rights: A Missed Opportunity?
title_fullStr The Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami II Case and the Protection of Indigenous Peoples' Rights: A Missed Opportunity?
title_full_unstemmed The Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami II Case and the Protection of Indigenous Peoples' Rights: A Missed Opportunity?
title_sort inuit tapiriit kanatami ii case and the protection of indigenous peoples' rights: a missed opportunity?
publisher European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/26
https://doaj.org/article/62f6621b130046fd98337f5052a11934
genre inuit
genre_facet inuit
op_source European Papers, Vol 2016 1, Iss 1, Pp 307-318 (2016)
op_relation 2499-8249
doi:10.15166/2499-8249/26
https://doaj.org/article/62f6621b130046fd98337f5052a11934
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/26
_version_ 1766045832415543296