Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?

Arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus) are susceptible to smooth Brucella (s-Brucella) infection and may be exposed to such bacteria through the consumption of infected marine mammals, as implied by the finding of s-Brucella antibodies in polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Arctic foxes in Svalbard have not previ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Research
Main Authors: Ingebjørg H. Nymo, Eva Fuglei, Torill Mørk, Eva M. Breines, Karin Holmgren, Rebecca Davidson, Morten Tryland
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Norwegian Polar Institute 2022
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v41.7867
https://doaj.org/article/56f08095500a40c38afc3e114be1181c
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:56f08095500a40c38afc3e114be1181c
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:56f08095500a40c38afc3e114be1181c 2023-05-15T14:31:12+02:00 Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative? Ingebjørg H. Nymo Eva Fuglei Torill Mørk Eva M. Breines Karin Holmgren Rebecca Davidson Morten Tryland 2022-07-01 https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v41.7867 https://doaj.org/article/56f08095500a40c38afc3e114be1181c en eng Norwegian Polar Institute 0800-0395 1751-8369 doi:10.33265/polar.v41.7867 https://doaj.org/article/56f08095500a40c38afc3e114be1181c undefined Polar Research, Vol 41, Pp 1-8 (2022) infection serology smooth brucella s-brucella vulpes lagopus epizootiology envir geo Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2022 fttriple https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v41.7867 2023-01-22T17:52:55Z Arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus) are susceptible to smooth Brucella (s-Brucella) infection and may be exposed to such bacteria through the consumption of infected marine mammals, as implied by the finding of s-Brucella antibodies in polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Arctic foxes in Svalbard have not previously been investigated for s-Brucella antibodies, but such antibodies have been detected in Arctic foxes in Iceland, Alaska (USA) and Russia. We investigated blood from Svalbard Arctic foxes for s-Brucella antibodies using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). The animals (0–13 years old) were either caught by fur trappers (1995–2003, n = 403) or found dead (1995 and 2003, n = 3). No seropositive animals were detected. Morbidity and mortality due to the infection cannot be ruled out. However, no known, large disease outbreaks of unknown aetiology have been reported. Furthermore, it is unlikely that the Svalbard Arctic fox is resistant to infection as Arctic foxes from other populations are susceptible, and there is circumpolar connectivity between populations. The discrepancy between the findings in Iceland and Svalbard is surprising as both populations are on islands with no known local sources of exposure to s-Brucella other than marine mammals. However, our negative findings suggest that marine mammals may not be a major source of infection for this species. Comparative investigations are needed in order to draw conclusions regarding the epizootiology of s-Brucella in Arctic foxes in Svalbard and Iceland. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Fox Arctic Iceland Polar Research Svalbard Ursus maritimus Vulpes lagopus Alaska Unknown Arctic Svalbard Polar Research 41
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic infection
serology
smooth brucella
s-brucella
vulpes lagopus
epizootiology
envir
geo
spellingShingle infection
serology
smooth brucella
s-brucella
vulpes lagopus
epizootiology
envir
geo
Ingebjørg H. Nymo
Eva Fuglei
Torill Mørk
Eva M. Breines
Karin Holmgren
Rebecca Davidson
Morten Tryland
Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?
topic_facet infection
serology
smooth brucella
s-brucella
vulpes lagopus
epizootiology
envir
geo
description Arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus) are susceptible to smooth Brucella (s-Brucella) infection and may be exposed to such bacteria through the consumption of infected marine mammals, as implied by the finding of s-Brucella antibodies in polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Arctic foxes in Svalbard have not previously been investigated for s-Brucella antibodies, but such antibodies have been detected in Arctic foxes in Iceland, Alaska (USA) and Russia. We investigated blood from Svalbard Arctic foxes for s-Brucella antibodies using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). The animals (0–13 years old) were either caught by fur trappers (1995–2003, n = 403) or found dead (1995 and 2003, n = 3). No seropositive animals were detected. Morbidity and mortality due to the infection cannot be ruled out. However, no known, large disease outbreaks of unknown aetiology have been reported. Furthermore, it is unlikely that the Svalbard Arctic fox is resistant to infection as Arctic foxes from other populations are susceptible, and there is circumpolar connectivity between populations. The discrepancy between the findings in Iceland and Svalbard is surprising as both populations are on islands with no known local sources of exposure to s-Brucella other than marine mammals. However, our negative findings suggest that marine mammals may not be a major source of infection for this species. Comparative investigations are needed in order to draw conclusions regarding the epizootiology of s-Brucella in Arctic foxes in Svalbard and Iceland.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ingebjørg H. Nymo
Eva Fuglei
Torill Mørk
Eva M. Breines
Karin Holmgren
Rebecca Davidson
Morten Tryland
author_facet Ingebjørg H. Nymo
Eva Fuglei
Torill Mørk
Eva M. Breines
Karin Holmgren
Rebecca Davidson
Morten Tryland
author_sort Ingebjørg H. Nymo
title Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?
title_short Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?
title_full Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?
title_fullStr Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?
title_full_unstemmed Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?
title_sort why are svalbard arctic foxes brucella spp. seronegative?
publisher Norwegian Polar Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v41.7867
https://doaj.org/article/56f08095500a40c38afc3e114be1181c
geographic Arctic
Svalbard
geographic_facet Arctic
Svalbard
genre Arctic Fox
Arctic
Iceland
Polar Research
Svalbard
Ursus maritimus
Vulpes lagopus
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic Fox
Arctic
Iceland
Polar Research
Svalbard
Ursus maritimus
Vulpes lagopus
Alaska
op_source Polar Research, Vol 41, Pp 1-8 (2022)
op_relation 0800-0395
1751-8369
doi:10.33265/polar.v41.7867
https://doaj.org/article/56f08095500a40c38afc3e114be1181c
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v41.7867
container_title Polar Research
container_volume 41
_version_ 1766304885815377920