Higher Education Institutions as Knowledge Brokers in Smart Specialisation

The effectiveness of societal interaction has become a key aspect in evaluating the success of higher education institutions (HEIs) in performing their duties. These factors have been built into institutional funding models, and the funding of research follows a similar approach. External stakeholde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability
Main Authors: Riikka Kangas, Timo Aarrevaara
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073044
https://doaj.org/article/4ef3fb6116e0414983ad0ecfbf09996f
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:4ef3fb6116e0414983ad0ecfbf09996f
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:4ef3fb6116e0414983ad0ecfbf09996f 2023-05-15T15:09:04+02:00 Higher Education Institutions as Knowledge Brokers in Smart Specialisation Riikka Kangas Timo Aarrevaara 2020-04-01 https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073044 https://doaj.org/article/4ef3fb6116e0414983ad0ecfbf09996f en eng MDPI AG doi:10.3390/su12073044 2071-1050 https://doaj.org/article/4ef3fb6116e0414983ad0ecfbf09996f undefined Sustainability, Vol 12, Iss 3044, p 3044 (2020) higher education knowledge brokers knowledge intensive policies smart specialisation innovation ecosystems manag hisphilso Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2020 fttriple https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073044 2023-01-22T17:53:11Z The effectiveness of societal interaction has become a key aspect in evaluating the success of higher education institutions (HEIs) in performing their duties. These factors have been built into institutional funding models, and the funding of research follows a similar approach. External stakeholders are now having to share in undertaking some of the functions that will define higher education institutions’ external activities, societal interaction and impact on society. The European Union’s smart specialisation strategy is such a factor. This initiative allows higher education institutions to implement policies by building regional clusters. The counterparts of higher education institutions in these clusters of smart specialisation are knowledge-intensive enterprises, high-tech service providers, educational institutions, the Arctic Smartness Specialisation Platform and other centers of expertise for smart specialisation. In this paper, we have analysed the role of higher education institutions as knowledge brokers in smart specialisation though a qualitative analysis of 20 interviews conducted during the implementation of the smart specialisation project. Our findings show that the knowledge broker role can be promoted from four perspectives: the social dimension of networks; decision-making and control; cluster building; and exchange elements. The clarification and legitimation of the role of higher education institutions as knowledge brokers in these areas would give smart specialisation more impetus to reach its goals. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Unknown Arctic Sustainability 12 7 3044
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic higher education
knowledge brokers
knowledge intensive policies
smart specialisation
innovation ecosystems
manag
hisphilso
spellingShingle higher education
knowledge brokers
knowledge intensive policies
smart specialisation
innovation ecosystems
manag
hisphilso
Riikka Kangas
Timo Aarrevaara
Higher Education Institutions as Knowledge Brokers in Smart Specialisation
topic_facet higher education
knowledge brokers
knowledge intensive policies
smart specialisation
innovation ecosystems
manag
hisphilso
description The effectiveness of societal interaction has become a key aspect in evaluating the success of higher education institutions (HEIs) in performing their duties. These factors have been built into institutional funding models, and the funding of research follows a similar approach. External stakeholders are now having to share in undertaking some of the functions that will define higher education institutions’ external activities, societal interaction and impact on society. The European Union’s smart specialisation strategy is such a factor. This initiative allows higher education institutions to implement policies by building regional clusters. The counterparts of higher education institutions in these clusters of smart specialisation are knowledge-intensive enterprises, high-tech service providers, educational institutions, the Arctic Smartness Specialisation Platform and other centers of expertise for smart specialisation. In this paper, we have analysed the role of higher education institutions as knowledge brokers in smart specialisation though a qualitative analysis of 20 interviews conducted during the implementation of the smart specialisation project. Our findings show that the knowledge broker role can be promoted from four perspectives: the social dimension of networks; decision-making and control; cluster building; and exchange elements. The clarification and legitimation of the role of higher education institutions as knowledge brokers in these areas would give smart specialisation more impetus to reach its goals.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Riikka Kangas
Timo Aarrevaara
author_facet Riikka Kangas
Timo Aarrevaara
author_sort Riikka Kangas
title Higher Education Institutions as Knowledge Brokers in Smart Specialisation
title_short Higher Education Institutions as Knowledge Brokers in Smart Specialisation
title_full Higher Education Institutions as Knowledge Brokers in Smart Specialisation
title_fullStr Higher Education Institutions as Knowledge Brokers in Smart Specialisation
title_full_unstemmed Higher Education Institutions as Knowledge Brokers in Smart Specialisation
title_sort higher education institutions as knowledge brokers in smart specialisation
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073044
https://doaj.org/article/4ef3fb6116e0414983ad0ecfbf09996f
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Sustainability, Vol 12, Iss 3044, p 3044 (2020)
op_relation doi:10.3390/su12073044
2071-1050
https://doaj.org/article/4ef3fb6116e0414983ad0ecfbf09996f
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073044
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 12
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3044
_version_ 1766340294526107648