Possible seismo-ionosphere perturbations revealed by VLF signals collected on ground and on a satellite

• Main Authors: A. Rozhnoi, O. Molchanov, M. Solovieva, V. Gladyshev, O. Akentieva, J. J. Berthelier, M. Parrot, F. Lefeuvre, M. Hayakawa, L. Castellana, P. F. Biagi
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2007
• Subjects: geo; envir; Petropavlovsk; Kamchatka
• Online Access: http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/7/617/2007/nhess-7-617-2007.pdf; https://doaj.org/article/4d7ac21b4ece40fca71a3f4ee62f7280

The results of the monitoring of three VLF/LF signals collected in Petropavlovsk station (Kamchatka, Russia) and one VLF signal collected on board of the DEMETER French satellite are presented. Two periods of the seismic activity occurred in the Japan-Kamchatka area during November–December 2004 and July–September 2005 were investigated and the earthquakes with M≥6.0 in the Japan-Kamchatka area, located inside one or more of the third Fresnel zones of the three radio paths were considered. The ground data were analysed using residual signal of phase dP or of amplitude dA, defined as the difference between the signal and the average of few quiet days (±5 days) immediately preceding or following the current day. Also the satellite data were processed by a method based on the difference between the real signal and the reference one, but in order to obtain this last signal it was necessary to construct previously a model of the signal distribution over the selected area. The method consists: (a) in averaging all the data available in the considered region over a period characterized by low level seismicity, regardless of the global disturbances, in particular, of the magnetic activity; (b) in computing a polynomial expression for the surface as a function of the longitude and the latitude. The model well describes the real data in condition of their completeness and in absence of magnetic storms or seismic forcing. In the quoted periods of seismic activity clear anomalies both in the ground and in satellite data were revealed. The influence of the geomagnetic activity cannot to be excluded, but the seismic forcing seems more probable.