Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri?

(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2019 4(2), 641-653 | European Forum Insight of 21 June 2019 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduzione. - II. Il caso AMP Antarctique di fronte alla Corte di giustizia. - III. Il giudizio della Corte: tra ripartizione delle competen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Susanna Villani
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Spanish
French
Italian
Published: European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/308
https://doaj.org/article/4a43d67ae2ed4e38bf5aca257e2a052e
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:4a43d67ae2ed4e38bf5aca257e2a052e
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:4a43d67ae2ed4e38bf5aca257e2a052e 2023-05-15T13:53:56+02:00 Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri? Reflections in the margins of the Court of Justice’s judgment in the Antarctic MPA case: a softer approach in favour of Member States? Susanna Villani 2019-06-01 https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/308 https://doaj.org/article/4a43d67ae2ed4e38bf5aca257e2a052e en es fr it eng spa fre ita European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) 2499-8249 doi:10.15166/2499-8249/308 https://doaj.org/article/4a43d67ae2ed4e38bf5aca257e2a052e undefined European Papers, Vol 2019 4, Iss 2, Pp 641-653 (2019) external action eu competences art. 218 para. 9 tfeu institutional framework international agreements action for annulment droit Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2019 fttriple https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/308 2023-01-22T18:00:00Z (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2019 4(2), 641-653 | European Forum Insight of 21 June 2019 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduzione. - II. Il caso AMP Antarctique di fronte alla Corte di giustizia. - III. Il giudizio della Corte: tra ripartizione delle competenze e diritto internazionale. - IV. La sentenza della Corte di giustizia: una mossa in controtendenza a favore degli Stati membri? - V. Osservazioni conclusive. | (Abstract) In November 2018, the Court of Justice ruled on the so-called Antarctica case (judgment of 20 November 2018, joined cases C‑626/15 e C‑659/16, Commission v. Council) on two actions of annulment brought by the Commission against Council decisions approving the submission to the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources ("the CCAMLR") of a reflection paper and a common position on four proposals concerning the creation and study of marine protected areas. The point concerned was the question of on behalf of whom the paper and the positions at issue could be submitted: the Union alone or the Union together with its Member States? Although it had no echo on the doctrinal level, the orientation assumed from the Court does introduce important elements, in particular in relation to the EU institutional framework as well as to the balance between Member States and the Union in terms of external action. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Antarctique* Unknown Antarctic The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
Spanish
French
Italian
topic external action
eu competences
art. 218
para. 9
tfeu
institutional framework
international agreements
action for annulment
droit
spellingShingle external action
eu competences
art. 218
para. 9
tfeu
institutional framework
international agreements
action for annulment
droit
Susanna Villani
Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri?
topic_facet external action
eu competences
art. 218
para. 9
tfeu
institutional framework
international agreements
action for annulment
droit
description (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2019 4(2), 641-653 | European Forum Insight of 21 June 2019 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduzione. - II. Il caso AMP Antarctique di fronte alla Corte di giustizia. - III. Il giudizio della Corte: tra ripartizione delle competenze e diritto internazionale. - IV. La sentenza della Corte di giustizia: una mossa in controtendenza a favore degli Stati membri? - V. Osservazioni conclusive. | (Abstract) In November 2018, the Court of Justice ruled on the so-called Antarctica case (judgment of 20 November 2018, joined cases C‑626/15 e C‑659/16, Commission v. Council) on two actions of annulment brought by the Commission against Council decisions approving the submission to the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources ("the CCAMLR") of a reflection paper and a common position on four proposals concerning the creation and study of marine protected areas. The point concerned was the question of on behalf of whom the paper and the positions at issue could be submitted: the Union alone or the Union together with its Member States? Although it had no echo on the doctrinal level, the orientation assumed from the Court does introduce important elements, in particular in relation to the EU institutional framework as well as to the balance between Member States and the Union in terms of external action.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Susanna Villani
author_facet Susanna Villani
author_sort Susanna Villani
title Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri?
title_short Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri?
title_full Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri?
title_fullStr Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri?
title_full_unstemmed Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri?
title_sort riflessioni a margine della sentenza della corte di giustizia nel caso amp antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli stati membri?
publisher European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/308
https://doaj.org/article/4a43d67ae2ed4e38bf5aca257e2a052e
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Antarctique*
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Antarctique*
op_source European Papers, Vol 2019 4, Iss 2, Pp 641-653 (2019)
op_relation 2499-8249
doi:10.15166/2499-8249/308
https://doaj.org/article/4a43d67ae2ed4e38bf5aca257e2a052e
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/308
_version_ 1766259413154267136