Protists in the polar regions: comparing occurrence in the Arctic and Southern oceans using pyrosequencing

In the ongoing discussion of the distribution of protists, whether they are globally distributed or endemic to one or both of the polar regions is the subject of heated debate. In this study, we compared next-generation sequencing data from the Arctic and the Southern oceans to reveal the extent of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Research
Main Authors: Christian Wolf, Estelle Kilias, Katja Metfies
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Norwegian Polar Institute 2015
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v34.23225
https://doaj.org/article/316a1b4b0beb48cd98f3ade558fa4485
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:316a1b4b0beb48cd98f3ade558fa4485
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:316a1b4b0beb48cd98f3ade558fa4485 2023-05-15T14:57:50+02:00 Protists in the polar regions: comparing occurrence in the Arctic and Southern oceans using pyrosequencing Christian Wolf Estelle Kilias Katja Metfies 2015-05-01 https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v34.23225 https://doaj.org/article/316a1b4b0beb48cd98f3ade558fa4485 en eng Norwegian Polar Institute 1751-8369 doi:10.3402/polar.v34.23225 https://doaj.org/article/316a1b4b0beb48cd98f3ade558fa4485 undefined Polar Research, Vol 34, Iss 0, Pp 1-8 (2015) 18S rDNA bipolar next-generation sequencing phytoplankton polar regions protist distribution geo demo Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2015 fttriple https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v34.23225 2023-01-22T18:17:17Z In the ongoing discussion of the distribution of protists, whether they are globally distributed or endemic to one or both of the polar regions is the subject of heated debate. In this study, we compared next-generation sequencing data from the Arctic and the Southern oceans to reveal the extent of similarities and dissimilarities between the protist communities in the polar regions. We found a total overlap of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) between the two regions of 11.2%. On closer inspection of different taxonomic groups, the overlap ranged between 5.5% (haptophytes) and 14.5% (alveolates). Within the different groups, the proportion of OTUs occurring in both regions greatly differed between the polar regions. On the one hand, the overlap between these two regions is remarkable, given the geographical distance between them. On the other hand, one could expect a greater overlap of OTUs between these regions on account of the similar environmental conditions. The overlap suggests a connection between the polar regions for at least certain species or that the evolutionary divergence has been slow, relative to the timescales of isolation. The different proportions of common OTUs among the groups or regions may be a result of different life cycle strategies or environmental adaptations. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Phytoplankton Polar Research Unknown Arctic Polar Research 34 1 23225
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic 18S rDNA
bipolar
next-generation sequencing
phytoplankton
polar regions
protist distribution
geo
demo
spellingShingle 18S rDNA
bipolar
next-generation sequencing
phytoplankton
polar regions
protist distribution
geo
demo
Christian Wolf
Estelle Kilias
Katja Metfies
Protists in the polar regions: comparing occurrence in the Arctic and Southern oceans using pyrosequencing
topic_facet 18S rDNA
bipolar
next-generation sequencing
phytoplankton
polar regions
protist distribution
geo
demo
description In the ongoing discussion of the distribution of protists, whether they are globally distributed or endemic to one or both of the polar regions is the subject of heated debate. In this study, we compared next-generation sequencing data from the Arctic and the Southern oceans to reveal the extent of similarities and dissimilarities between the protist communities in the polar regions. We found a total overlap of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) between the two regions of 11.2%. On closer inspection of different taxonomic groups, the overlap ranged between 5.5% (haptophytes) and 14.5% (alveolates). Within the different groups, the proportion of OTUs occurring in both regions greatly differed between the polar regions. On the one hand, the overlap between these two regions is remarkable, given the geographical distance between them. On the other hand, one could expect a greater overlap of OTUs between these regions on account of the similar environmental conditions. The overlap suggests a connection between the polar regions for at least certain species or that the evolutionary divergence has been slow, relative to the timescales of isolation. The different proportions of common OTUs among the groups or regions may be a result of different life cycle strategies or environmental adaptations.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Christian Wolf
Estelle Kilias
Katja Metfies
author_facet Christian Wolf
Estelle Kilias
Katja Metfies
author_sort Christian Wolf
title Protists in the polar regions: comparing occurrence in the Arctic and Southern oceans using pyrosequencing
title_short Protists in the polar regions: comparing occurrence in the Arctic and Southern oceans using pyrosequencing
title_full Protists in the polar regions: comparing occurrence in the Arctic and Southern oceans using pyrosequencing
title_fullStr Protists in the polar regions: comparing occurrence in the Arctic and Southern oceans using pyrosequencing
title_full_unstemmed Protists in the polar regions: comparing occurrence in the Arctic and Southern oceans using pyrosequencing
title_sort protists in the polar regions: comparing occurrence in the arctic and southern oceans using pyrosequencing
publisher Norwegian Polar Institute
publishDate 2015
url https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v34.23225
https://doaj.org/article/316a1b4b0beb48cd98f3ade558fa4485
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Phytoplankton
Polar Research
genre_facet Arctic
Phytoplankton
Polar Research
op_source Polar Research, Vol 34, Iss 0, Pp 1-8 (2015)
op_relation 1751-8369
doi:10.3402/polar.v34.23225
https://doaj.org/article/316a1b4b0beb48cd98f3ade558fa4485
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v34.23225
container_title Polar Research
container_volume 34
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23225
_version_ 1766329942062137344