Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Certification of Arctic Fisheries: Processes and Outcomes

Certification according to private sustainability standards (ecolabelling) has become an important addition to public fisheries management in recent years. The major global ecolabel in terms of comprehensiveness and coverage is the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Fisheries Standard. Under the MSC S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Review on Law and Politics
Main Author: Geir Hønneland
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Norwegian
Published: Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2488
https://doaj.org/article/2fed33bfa4e24755bc1b5267f2446f25
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:2fed33bfa4e24755bc1b5267f2446f25
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:2fed33bfa4e24755bc1b5267f2446f25 2023-05-15T14:22:35+02:00 Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Certification of Arctic Fisheries: Processes and Outcomes Geir Hønneland 2020-12-01 https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2488 https://doaj.org/article/2fed33bfa4e24755bc1b5267f2446f25 en no eng nor Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 2387-4562 doi:10.23865/arctic.v11.2488 https://doaj.org/article/2fed33bfa4e24755bc1b5267f2446f25 undefined Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 11, Iss 0, Pp 133-156 (2020) marine stewardship council ecolabelling arctic fisheries barents sea envir droit Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2020 fttriple https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2488 2023-01-22T19:37:20Z Certification according to private sustainability standards (ecolabelling) has become an important addition to public fisheries management in recent years. The major global ecolabel in terms of comprehensiveness and coverage is the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Fisheries Standard. Under the MSC Standard, the status of the fishery’s target stocks, its impact on the wider ecosystem and the effectiveness of its management system are assessed. Becoming and remaining certified requires continuous behavioural adaptation from fisheries through a fine-meshed system of conditions attached to certification. In this article, MSC certification of two clusters of fisheries in Arctic waters is discussed, one large- and one small-scale. In the Barents Sea cod and haddock fisheries, the main obstacle to certification has been the fisheries’ impact on endangered, threatened and protected (ETP) species and bottom habitats, and in order to remain certified beyond the first five-year certification period, the fishing companies have had to introduce a number of voluntary measures beyond what is required by law. In the local lumpfish fisheries in Greenland, Iceland and Norway, conditions attached to certification have been related to the effects of these fisheries on seabirds and marine mammals. Here essential parts of a management regime, such as biological reference points and harvest control rules, have come about as a direct result of MSC certification. MSC certification is no panacea, but it seems to have found a niche as a supplement to national legislation and international agreements. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Arctic review on law and politics Barents Sea Greenland Iceland Unknown Arctic Barents Sea Greenland Norway Arctic Review on Law and Politics 11 0 133
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
Norwegian
topic marine stewardship council
ecolabelling
arctic fisheries
barents sea
envir
droit
spellingShingle marine stewardship council
ecolabelling
arctic fisheries
barents sea
envir
droit
Geir Hønneland
Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Certification of Arctic Fisheries: Processes and Outcomes
topic_facet marine stewardship council
ecolabelling
arctic fisheries
barents sea
envir
droit
description Certification according to private sustainability standards (ecolabelling) has become an important addition to public fisheries management in recent years. The major global ecolabel in terms of comprehensiveness and coverage is the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Fisheries Standard. Under the MSC Standard, the status of the fishery’s target stocks, its impact on the wider ecosystem and the effectiveness of its management system are assessed. Becoming and remaining certified requires continuous behavioural adaptation from fisheries through a fine-meshed system of conditions attached to certification. In this article, MSC certification of two clusters of fisheries in Arctic waters is discussed, one large- and one small-scale. In the Barents Sea cod and haddock fisheries, the main obstacle to certification has been the fisheries’ impact on endangered, threatened and protected (ETP) species and bottom habitats, and in order to remain certified beyond the first five-year certification period, the fishing companies have had to introduce a number of voluntary measures beyond what is required by law. In the local lumpfish fisheries in Greenland, Iceland and Norway, conditions attached to certification have been related to the effects of these fisheries on seabirds and marine mammals. Here essential parts of a management regime, such as biological reference points and harvest control rules, have come about as a direct result of MSC certification. MSC certification is no panacea, but it seems to have found a niche as a supplement to national legislation and international agreements.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Geir Hønneland
author_facet Geir Hønneland
author_sort Geir Hønneland
title Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Certification of Arctic Fisheries: Processes and Outcomes
title_short Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Certification of Arctic Fisheries: Processes and Outcomes
title_full Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Certification of Arctic Fisheries: Processes and Outcomes
title_fullStr Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Certification of Arctic Fisheries: Processes and Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Certification of Arctic Fisheries: Processes and Outcomes
title_sort marine stewardship council (msc) certification of arctic fisheries: processes and outcomes
publisher Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2488
https://doaj.org/article/2fed33bfa4e24755bc1b5267f2446f25
geographic Arctic
Barents Sea
Greenland
Norway
geographic_facet Arctic
Barents Sea
Greenland
Norway
genre Arctic
Arctic
Arctic review on law and politics
Barents Sea
Greenland
Iceland
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Arctic review on law and politics
Barents Sea
Greenland
Iceland
op_source Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 11, Iss 0, Pp 133-156 (2020)
op_relation 2387-4562
doi:10.23865/arctic.v11.2488
https://doaj.org/article/2fed33bfa4e24755bc1b5267f2446f25
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2488
container_title Arctic Review on Law and Politics
container_volume 11
container_issue 0
container_start_page 133
_version_ 1766295137589133312