Loyalty vs. Sovereignty
The German Constitutional Court’s Weiss ruling has led to a major debate as to whether a national supreme court may disregard ECJ case law, asserting that the ECJ had acted ultra vires. Similar debates have existed for quite some time in the EFTA pillar of the EEA, consisting of Iceland, Liechtenste...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | German English |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/2d436ad721bc4b619266d482527f7d41 |
id |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:2d436ad721bc4b619266d482527f7d41 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:2d436ad721bc4b619266d482527f7d41 2023-05-15T16:48:53+02:00 Loyalty vs. Sovereignty Carl Baudenbacher https://doaj.org/article/2d436ad721bc4b619266d482527f7d41 de en ger eng Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH 2366-7044 https://doaj.org/article/2d436ad721bc4b619266d482527f7d41 undefined Verfassungsblog, Iss 2366-7044 EEA EFTA room for manoeuvre droit hist Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ fttriple 2023-01-22T18:51:56Z The German Constitutional Court’s Weiss ruling has led to a major debate as to whether a national supreme court may disregard ECJ case law, asserting that the ECJ had acted ultra vires. Similar debates have existed for quite some time in the EFTA pillar of the EEA, consisting of Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. A relatively small but powerful group of lawyers in the Norwegian administration (led by the Government Attorney), orthodox dualist professors and judges loyal to the government has used Norway’s dominant position to attempt to redefine EEA law. One of the most effective strategies is the suppression of the notion of loyalty or good faith and its replacement by a strategy of creating “room for manoeuvre” (“RFM”) for Norway. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Unknown Norway Pillar ENVELOPE(166.217,166.217,-77.583,-77.583) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
fttriple |
language |
German English |
topic |
EEA EFTA room for manoeuvre droit hist |
spellingShingle |
EEA EFTA room for manoeuvre droit hist Carl Baudenbacher Loyalty vs. Sovereignty |
topic_facet |
EEA EFTA room for manoeuvre droit hist |
description |
The German Constitutional Court’s Weiss ruling has led to a major debate as to whether a national supreme court may disregard ECJ case law, asserting that the ECJ had acted ultra vires. Similar debates have existed for quite some time in the EFTA pillar of the EEA, consisting of Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. A relatively small but powerful group of lawyers in the Norwegian administration (led by the Government Attorney), orthodox dualist professors and judges loyal to the government has used Norway’s dominant position to attempt to redefine EEA law. One of the most effective strategies is the suppression of the notion of loyalty or good faith and its replacement by a strategy of creating “room for manoeuvre” (“RFM”) for Norway. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Carl Baudenbacher |
author_facet |
Carl Baudenbacher |
author_sort |
Carl Baudenbacher |
title |
Loyalty vs. Sovereignty |
title_short |
Loyalty vs. Sovereignty |
title_full |
Loyalty vs. Sovereignty |
title_fullStr |
Loyalty vs. Sovereignty |
title_full_unstemmed |
Loyalty vs. Sovereignty |
title_sort |
loyalty vs. sovereignty |
publisher |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/2d436ad721bc4b619266d482527f7d41 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(166.217,166.217,-77.583,-77.583) |
geographic |
Norway Pillar |
geographic_facet |
Norway Pillar |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_source |
Verfassungsblog, Iss 2366-7044 |
op_relation |
2366-7044 https://doaj.org/article/2d436ad721bc4b619266d482527f7d41 |
op_rights |
undefined |
_version_ |
1766038969842139136 |