Impacts, Systemic Risk and National Response Measures Concerning COVID-19—The Island Case Studies of Iceland and Greenland

The Arctic is a remote region that has become increasingly globalized, yet it remains extremely vulnerable to many risks. The COVID-19 pandemic presented new challenges to the region. Using the search, appraisal, synthesis and analysis (SALSA) approach to conduct a meta-synthesis of the academic and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability
Main Authors: David Cook, Lára Jóhannsdóttir
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158470
https://doaj.org/article/2197b64e45f44cf2a688fece9d540075
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:2197b64e45f44cf2a688fece9d540075
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:2197b64e45f44cf2a688fece9d540075 2023-05-15T14:53:12+02:00 Impacts, Systemic Risk and National Response Measures Concerning COVID-19—The Island Case Studies of Iceland and Greenland David Cook Lára Jóhannsdóttir 2021-07-01 https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158470 https://doaj.org/article/2197b64e45f44cf2a688fece9d540075 en eng MDPI AG doi:10.3390/su13158470 2071-1050 https://doaj.org/article/2197b64e45f44cf2a688fece9d540075 undefined Sustainability, Vol 13, Iss 8470, p 8470 (2021) risk resilience pandemic prioritization risk management Arctic manag envir Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2021 fttriple https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158470 2023-01-22T19:12:19Z The Arctic is a remote region that has become increasingly globalized, yet it remains extremely vulnerable to many risks. The COVID-19 pandemic presented new challenges to the region. Using the search, appraisal, synthesis and analysis (SALSA) approach to conduct a meta-synthesis of the academic and grey literature on the impacts of the pandemic, an assessment is conducted of the types of risks that have been presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, the scales, and the national response strategies for mitigating the risks. Two case studies are explored: Iceland and Greenland, island nations that exemplify the extremes of the Arctic and reliance on tourism, a sector that was nearly entirely suspended by the pandemic. An evaluative matrix is employed which combines five different scales of risk—nano, micro, meso, macro and cosmic—with a sustainability categorization of impacts. The risks of the pandemic cut across the respective scale and categories, with the potential for macro-scale events (systemic risk) to unfold linked to economic spillover effects driven by the curtailment of tourism and various supply chain delays. Both Iceland and Greenland have exemplified risk mitigation strategies that prioritize health over wealth, very strictly in the case of the latter. Strict border controls and domestic restrictions have enabled Iceland and Greenland to have much lower case and death numbers than most nations. In addition, Iceland has led the way, globally, in terms of testing and accumulating scientific knowledge through genetic sequencing of the virus. The academic contribution of the paper concerns its broadening of understanding concerning systemic risk, which extends beyond financial implications to includes sustainability dimensions. For policymakers and practitioners, the paper highlights successful risk mitigation and science-based measures that will be useful for any nation tackling a future pandemic, regardless of whether they are island states, Arctic nations or another country. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Greenland Iceland Unknown Arctic Greenland Sustainability 13 15 8470
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic risk
resilience
pandemic
prioritization
risk management
Arctic
manag
envir
spellingShingle risk
resilience
pandemic
prioritization
risk management
Arctic
manag
envir
David Cook
Lára Jóhannsdóttir
Impacts, Systemic Risk and National Response Measures Concerning COVID-19—The Island Case Studies of Iceland and Greenland
topic_facet risk
resilience
pandemic
prioritization
risk management
Arctic
manag
envir
description The Arctic is a remote region that has become increasingly globalized, yet it remains extremely vulnerable to many risks. The COVID-19 pandemic presented new challenges to the region. Using the search, appraisal, synthesis and analysis (SALSA) approach to conduct a meta-synthesis of the academic and grey literature on the impacts of the pandemic, an assessment is conducted of the types of risks that have been presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, the scales, and the national response strategies for mitigating the risks. Two case studies are explored: Iceland and Greenland, island nations that exemplify the extremes of the Arctic and reliance on tourism, a sector that was nearly entirely suspended by the pandemic. An evaluative matrix is employed which combines five different scales of risk—nano, micro, meso, macro and cosmic—with a sustainability categorization of impacts. The risks of the pandemic cut across the respective scale and categories, with the potential for macro-scale events (systemic risk) to unfold linked to economic spillover effects driven by the curtailment of tourism and various supply chain delays. Both Iceland and Greenland have exemplified risk mitigation strategies that prioritize health over wealth, very strictly in the case of the latter. Strict border controls and domestic restrictions have enabled Iceland and Greenland to have much lower case and death numbers than most nations. In addition, Iceland has led the way, globally, in terms of testing and accumulating scientific knowledge through genetic sequencing of the virus. The academic contribution of the paper concerns its broadening of understanding concerning systemic risk, which extends beyond financial implications to includes sustainability dimensions. For policymakers and practitioners, the paper highlights successful risk mitigation and science-based measures that will be useful for any nation tackling a future pandemic, regardless of whether they are island states, Arctic nations or another country.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author David Cook
Lára Jóhannsdóttir
author_facet David Cook
Lára Jóhannsdóttir
author_sort David Cook
title Impacts, Systemic Risk and National Response Measures Concerning COVID-19—The Island Case Studies of Iceland and Greenland
title_short Impacts, Systemic Risk and National Response Measures Concerning COVID-19—The Island Case Studies of Iceland and Greenland
title_full Impacts, Systemic Risk and National Response Measures Concerning COVID-19—The Island Case Studies of Iceland and Greenland
title_fullStr Impacts, Systemic Risk and National Response Measures Concerning COVID-19—The Island Case Studies of Iceland and Greenland
title_full_unstemmed Impacts, Systemic Risk and National Response Measures Concerning COVID-19—The Island Case Studies of Iceland and Greenland
title_sort impacts, systemic risk and national response measures concerning covid-19—the island case studies of iceland and greenland
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158470
https://doaj.org/article/2197b64e45f44cf2a688fece9d540075
geographic Arctic
Greenland
geographic_facet Arctic
Greenland
genre Arctic
Greenland
Iceland
genre_facet Arctic
Greenland
Iceland
op_source Sustainability, Vol 13, Iss 8470, p 8470 (2021)
op_relation doi:10.3390/su13158470
2071-1050
https://doaj.org/article/2197b64e45f44cf2a688fece9d540075
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158470
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 13
container_issue 15
container_start_page 8470
_version_ 1766324614756040704