Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past

Many sources of uncertainty limit the accuracy of climate projections. Among them, we focus here on the parameter uncertainty, i.e. the imperfect knowledge of the values of many physical parameters in a climate model. Therefore, we use LOVECLIM, a global three-dimensional Earth system model of inter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Climate of the Past
Main Authors: M. F. Loutre, A. Mouchet, T. Fichefet, H. Goosse, H. Goelzer, P. Huybrechts
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2011
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-511-2011
http://www.clim-past.net/7/511/2011/cp-7-511-2011.pdf
https://doaj.org/article/213276380465444e87651c211fe3295d
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:213276380465444e87651c211fe3295d
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:213276380465444e87651c211fe3295d 2023-05-15T17:36:14+02:00 Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past M. F. Loutre A. Mouchet T. Fichefet H. Goosse H. Goelzer P. Huybrechts 2011-05-01 https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-511-2011 http://www.clim-past.net/7/511/2011/cp-7-511-2011.pdf https://doaj.org/article/213276380465444e87651c211fe3295d en eng Copernicus Publications doi:10.5194/cp-7-511-2011 1814-9324 1814-9332 http://www.clim-past.net/7/511/2011/cp-7-511-2011.pdf https://doaj.org/article/213276380465444e87651c211fe3295d undefined Climate of the Past, Vol 7, Iss 2, Pp 511-526 (2011) envir geo Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2011 fttriple https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-511-2011 2023-01-22T17:32:53Z Many sources of uncertainty limit the accuracy of climate projections. Among them, we focus here on the parameter uncertainty, i.e. the imperfect knowledge of the values of many physical parameters in a climate model. Therefore, we use LOVECLIM, a global three-dimensional Earth system model of intermediate complexity and vary several parameters within a range based on the expert judgement of model developers. Nine climatic parameter sets and three carbon cycle parameter sets are selected because they yield present-day climate simulations coherent with observations and they cover a wide range of climate responses to doubled atmospheric CO2 concentration and freshwater flux perturbation in the North Atlantic. Moreover, they also lead to a large range of atmospheric CO2 concentrations in response to prescribed emissions. Consequently, we have at our disposal 27 alternative versions of LOVECLIM (each corresponding to one parameter set) that provide very different responses to some climate forcings. The 27 model versions are then used to illustrate the range of responses provided over the recent past, to compare the time evolution of climate variables over the time interval for which they are available (the last few decades up to more than one century) and to identify the outliers and the "best" versions over that particular time span. For example, between 1979 and 2005, the simulated global annual mean surface temperature increase ranges from 0.24 °C to 0.64 °C, while the simulated increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration varies between 40 and 50 ppmv. Measurements over the same period indicate an increase in global annual mean surface temperature of 0.45 °C (Brohan et al., 2006) and an increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration of 44 ppmv (Enting et al., 1994; GLOBALVIEW-CO2, 2006). Only a few parameter sets yield simulations that reproduce the observed key variables of the climate system over the last decades. Furthermore, our results show that the model response, including its ocean component, is strongly ... Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Unknown Climate of the Past 7 2 511 526
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic envir
geo
spellingShingle envir
geo
M. F. Loutre
A. Mouchet
T. Fichefet
H. Goosse
H. Goelzer
P. Huybrechts
Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past
topic_facet envir
geo
description Many sources of uncertainty limit the accuracy of climate projections. Among them, we focus here on the parameter uncertainty, i.e. the imperfect knowledge of the values of many physical parameters in a climate model. Therefore, we use LOVECLIM, a global three-dimensional Earth system model of intermediate complexity and vary several parameters within a range based on the expert judgement of model developers. Nine climatic parameter sets and three carbon cycle parameter sets are selected because they yield present-day climate simulations coherent with observations and they cover a wide range of climate responses to doubled atmospheric CO2 concentration and freshwater flux perturbation in the North Atlantic. Moreover, they also lead to a large range of atmospheric CO2 concentrations in response to prescribed emissions. Consequently, we have at our disposal 27 alternative versions of LOVECLIM (each corresponding to one parameter set) that provide very different responses to some climate forcings. The 27 model versions are then used to illustrate the range of responses provided over the recent past, to compare the time evolution of climate variables over the time interval for which they are available (the last few decades up to more than one century) and to identify the outliers and the "best" versions over that particular time span. For example, between 1979 and 2005, the simulated global annual mean surface temperature increase ranges from 0.24 °C to 0.64 °C, while the simulated increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration varies between 40 and 50 ppmv. Measurements over the same period indicate an increase in global annual mean surface temperature of 0.45 °C (Brohan et al., 2006) and an increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration of 44 ppmv (Enting et al., 1994; GLOBALVIEW-CO2, 2006). Only a few parameter sets yield simulations that reproduce the observed key variables of the climate system over the last decades. Furthermore, our results show that the model response, including its ocean component, is strongly ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author M. F. Loutre
A. Mouchet
T. Fichefet
H. Goosse
H. Goelzer
P. Huybrechts
author_facet M. F. Loutre
A. Mouchet
T. Fichefet
H. Goosse
H. Goelzer
P. Huybrechts
author_sort M. F. Loutre
title Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past
title_short Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past
title_full Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past
title_fullStr Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past
title_sort evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2011
url https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-511-2011
http://www.clim-past.net/7/511/2011/cp-7-511-2011.pdf
https://doaj.org/article/213276380465444e87651c211fe3295d
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Climate of the Past, Vol 7, Iss 2, Pp 511-526 (2011)
op_relation doi:10.5194/cp-7-511-2011
1814-9324
1814-9332
http://www.clim-past.net/7/511/2011/cp-7-511-2011.pdf
https://doaj.org/article/213276380465444e87651c211fe3295d
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-511-2011
container_title Climate of the Past
container_volume 7
container_issue 2
container_start_page 511
op_container_end_page 526
_version_ 1766135647399051264