Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements

This paper argues that participatory governance initiatives like co-management can be made effective through agency rulemaking. Using the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board as a case study, this paper affirms that it is possible for marginalized stakeholders to participate in co-mana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
Main Author: Sari M. Graben
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
French
Published: University of Windsor 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4485
https://doaj.org/article/19759198ca7c496e89f6b3dc5006343d
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:19759198ca7c496e89f6b3dc5006343d
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:19759198ca7c496e89f6b3dc5006343d 2023-05-15T15:04:13+02:00 Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements Sari M. Graben 2011-02-01 https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4485 https://doaj.org/article/19759198ca7c496e89f6b3dc5006343d en fr eng fre University of Windsor doi:10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4485 2561-5017 https://doaj.org/article/19759198ca7c496e89f6b3dc5006343d undefined Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, Vol 29 (2011) scipo hisphilso Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2011 fttriple https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4485 2023-01-22T19:36:52Z This paper argues that participatory governance initiatives like co-management can be made effective through agency rulemaking. Using the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board as a case study, this paper affirms that it is possible for marginalized stakeholders to participate in co-management and alter decision-making. By using its formal authority to generate rules that reflect community perspectives, this board contextualized environmental assessment in community-based perspectives. The study of participation presented here illustrates: 1) that a high level of agency support for community participation in rule-making can lead to rules which reflect community perspectives; and 2) that agency implementation of community perspectives has led to the increased use of stakeholder collaboration through private agreement. Nonetheless, the paper also addresses limitations on the ability to translate social needs into privately negotiated agreements where negotiations depart from highly commoditized terms. Consequently, this paper questions the use of negotiated agreements to meet the goals of stakeholder participation, as conceived by deliberative democratic strands of new governance. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Mackenzie Valley Unknown Arctic Mackenzie Valley ENVELOPE(-126.070,-126.070,52.666,52.666) Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 29 195
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
French
topic scipo
hisphilso
spellingShingle scipo
hisphilso
Sari M. Graben
Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements
topic_facet scipo
hisphilso
description This paper argues that participatory governance initiatives like co-management can be made effective through agency rulemaking. Using the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board as a case study, this paper affirms that it is possible for marginalized stakeholders to participate in co-management and alter decision-making. By using its formal authority to generate rules that reflect community perspectives, this board contextualized environmental assessment in community-based perspectives. The study of participation presented here illustrates: 1) that a high level of agency support for community participation in rule-making can lead to rules which reflect community perspectives; and 2) that agency implementation of community perspectives has led to the increased use of stakeholder collaboration through private agreement. Nonetheless, the paper also addresses limitations on the ability to translate social needs into privately negotiated agreements where negotiations depart from highly commoditized terms. Consequently, this paper questions the use of negotiated agreements to meet the goals of stakeholder participation, as conceived by deliberative democratic strands of new governance.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sari M. Graben
author_facet Sari M. Graben
author_sort Sari M. Graben
title Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements
title_short Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements
title_full Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements
title_fullStr Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements
title_sort assessing stakeholder participation in sub-arctic co-management: administrative rulemaking and private agreements
publisher University of Windsor
publishDate 2011
url https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4485
https://doaj.org/article/19759198ca7c496e89f6b3dc5006343d
long_lat ENVELOPE(-126.070,-126.070,52.666,52.666)
geographic Arctic
Mackenzie Valley
geographic_facet Arctic
Mackenzie Valley
genre Arctic
Mackenzie Valley
genre_facet Arctic
Mackenzie Valley
op_source Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, Vol 29 (2011)
op_relation doi:10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4485
2561-5017
https://doaj.org/article/19759198ca7c496e89f6b3dc5006343d
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4485
container_title Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
container_volume 29
container_start_page 195
_version_ 1766336029306912768