Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible?
This article provides a detailed legal comparison of the free movement and residence rights, including mutual recognition of qualifications and social security co-ordination, accorded to nationals of the four EFTA States: Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. The first half considers the e...
Published in: | Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.08.2012.152 https://doaj.org/article/1470c7b311cd418e88475738de71a761 |
id |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:1470c7b311cd418e88475738de71a761 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:1470c7b311cd418e88475738de71a761 2023-05-15T16:49:56+02:00 Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible? Matthew Alexander Jay 2012-12-01 https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.08.2012.152 https://doaj.org/article/1470c7b311cd418e88475738de71a761 en eng University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law doi:10.3935/cyelp.08.2012.152 1845-5662 1848-9958 https://doaj.org/article/1470c7b311cd418e88475738de71a761 undefined Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, Vol 8, Pp 78-115 (2012) free movement residence mutual recognition of qualifications social security co-ordination efta eea agreement eu-swiss framework directive 2004/38 droit scipo Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2012 fttriple https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.08.2012.152 2023-01-22T18:38:12Z This article provides a detailed legal comparison of the free movement and residence rights, including mutual recognition of qualifications and social security co-ordination, accorded to nationals of the four EFTA States: Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. The first half considers the extent to which the EEA Agreement, which relates to the former three countries, secures homogeneity in this area of law; and the second half looks at the EU-Swiss framework for the same purposes. It concludes that the EEA framework, through the activism of its Court, goes a long way to securing homogeneity—to the extent of equating nationality of an EEA-EFTA state with Union citizenship, at least for the purposes of movement and residence. The Swiss system, by contrast, fails miserably in this regard as the rights under the Swiss agreement still mirror those prior to Directive 2004/38. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Unknown Norway Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 8 8 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
fttriple |
language |
English |
topic |
free movement residence mutual recognition of qualifications social security co-ordination efta eea agreement eu-swiss framework directive 2004/38 droit scipo |
spellingShingle |
free movement residence mutual recognition of qualifications social security co-ordination efta eea agreement eu-swiss framework directive 2004/38 droit scipo Matthew Alexander Jay Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible? |
topic_facet |
free movement residence mutual recognition of qualifications social security co-ordination efta eea agreement eu-swiss framework directive 2004/38 droit scipo |
description |
This article provides a detailed legal comparison of the free movement and residence rights, including mutual recognition of qualifications and social security co-ordination, accorded to nationals of the four EFTA States: Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. The first half considers the extent to which the EEA Agreement, which relates to the former three countries, secures homogeneity in this area of law; and the second half looks at the EU-Swiss framework for the same purposes. It concludes that the EEA framework, through the activism of its Court, goes a long way to securing homogeneity—to the extent of equating nationality of an EEA-EFTA state with Union citizenship, at least for the purposes of movement and residence. The Swiss system, by contrast, fails miserably in this regard as the rights under the Swiss agreement still mirror those prior to Directive 2004/38. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Matthew Alexander Jay |
author_facet |
Matthew Alexander Jay |
author_sort |
Matthew Alexander Jay |
title |
Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible? |
title_short |
Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible? |
title_full |
Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible? |
title_fullStr |
Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible? |
title_sort |
homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: mission impossible? |
publisher |
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.08.2012.152 https://doaj.org/article/1470c7b311cd418e88475738de71a761 |
geographic |
Norway |
geographic_facet |
Norway |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_source |
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, Vol 8, Pp 78-115 (2012) |
op_relation |
doi:10.3935/cyelp.08.2012.152 1845-5662 1848-9958 https://doaj.org/article/1470c7b311cd418e88475738de71a761 |
op_rights |
undefined |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.08.2012.152 |
container_title |
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy |
container_volume |
8 |
container_issue |
8 |
_version_ |
1766040107877400576 |