DRIVING THE GIFT HOME

In reflecting on the relationship between ongoing Canadian colonialism and sacred indigenous spaces, the author considers different conceptions of constitutionalism and of law from the location of Gaamitigomishkag, a sacred site for four Anishinaabe communities (including the author’s) in the Bounda...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
Main Author: Aaron Mills
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
French
Published: University of Windsor 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4816
https://doaj.org/article/129df0fc460d4713b270bfbfcae0efff
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:129df0fc460d4713b270bfbfcae0efff
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:129df0fc460d4713b270bfbfcae0efff 2023-05-15T13:28:50+02:00 DRIVING THE GIFT HOME Aaron Mills 2017-01-01 https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4816 https://doaj.org/article/129df0fc460d4713b270bfbfcae0efff en fr eng fre University of Windsor doi:10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4816 2561-5017 https://doaj.org/article/129df0fc460d4713b270bfbfcae0efff undefined Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, Vol 33, Iss 1 (2017) droit hisphilso Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2017 fttriple https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4816 2023-01-22T18:01:20Z In reflecting on the relationship between ongoing Canadian colonialism and sacred indigenous spaces, the author considers different conceptions of constitutionalism and of law from the location of Gaamitigomishkag, a sacred site for four Anishinaabe communities (including the author’s) in the Boundary Waters area of Treaty #3. The inquiry is framed by the author’s relationship with his grandmother. In the first section he recalls what it was like learning to learn Anishinaabe law from her. He invites his readers to join him in shifting their focus from what to how they learn something (perhaps radically) new. In the second section he shares an anecdote about learning from his grandmother on one particular summer day at Gaamitigomishkag. In the third section, he challenges readers to deploy the interrogative shift from what to how through a narrative that begins to disclose structural differences between Canadian and Anishinaabe constitutionalisms, and thus, their respective systems of law. Given the narrative form of much of this article, readers have to work for their meanings. Each arc in the third section’s narrative begins at Gaamitigomishkag, but discloses very different ways that peoples might constitute themselves as political community in, near and through it. A critical question the article poses is not what, but rather how should one think about community in this space? The article ends in the present where Canadian constitutionalism has been smashed on top of Anishinaabe constitutionalism. The author is left at Gaamitigomishkag reflecting on which community(ies) he belongs to. He invites the reader to consider whether he decides. Article in Journal/Newspaper anishina* Unknown Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 33 1 167 186
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
French
topic droit
hisphilso
spellingShingle droit
hisphilso
Aaron Mills
DRIVING THE GIFT HOME
topic_facet droit
hisphilso
description In reflecting on the relationship between ongoing Canadian colonialism and sacred indigenous spaces, the author considers different conceptions of constitutionalism and of law from the location of Gaamitigomishkag, a sacred site for four Anishinaabe communities (including the author’s) in the Boundary Waters area of Treaty #3. The inquiry is framed by the author’s relationship with his grandmother. In the first section he recalls what it was like learning to learn Anishinaabe law from her. He invites his readers to join him in shifting their focus from what to how they learn something (perhaps radically) new. In the second section he shares an anecdote about learning from his grandmother on one particular summer day at Gaamitigomishkag. In the third section, he challenges readers to deploy the interrogative shift from what to how through a narrative that begins to disclose structural differences between Canadian and Anishinaabe constitutionalisms, and thus, their respective systems of law. Given the narrative form of much of this article, readers have to work for their meanings. Each arc in the third section’s narrative begins at Gaamitigomishkag, but discloses very different ways that peoples might constitute themselves as political community in, near and through it. A critical question the article poses is not what, but rather how should one think about community in this space? The article ends in the present where Canadian constitutionalism has been smashed on top of Anishinaabe constitutionalism. The author is left at Gaamitigomishkag reflecting on which community(ies) he belongs to. He invites the reader to consider whether he decides.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Aaron Mills
author_facet Aaron Mills
author_sort Aaron Mills
title DRIVING THE GIFT HOME
title_short DRIVING THE GIFT HOME
title_full DRIVING THE GIFT HOME
title_fullStr DRIVING THE GIFT HOME
title_full_unstemmed DRIVING THE GIFT HOME
title_sort driving the gift home
publisher University of Windsor
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4816
https://doaj.org/article/129df0fc460d4713b270bfbfcae0efff
genre anishina*
genre_facet anishina*
op_source Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, Vol 33, Iss 1 (2017)
op_relation doi:10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4816
2561-5017
https://doaj.org/article/129df0fc460d4713b270bfbfcae0efff
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4816
container_title Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
container_volume 33
container_issue 1
container_start_page 167
op_container_end_page 186
_version_ 1765996792032264192