Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms

Microtomography can measure the X-ray attenuation coefficient in a 3-D volume of snow with a spatial resolution of a few microns. In order to extract quantitative characteristics of the microstructure, such as the specific surface area (SSA), from these data, the greyscale image first needs to be se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: P. Hagenmuller, M. Matzl, G. Chambon, M. Schneebeli
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1039-2016
http://www.the-cryosphere.net/10/1039/2016/tc-10-1039-2016.pdf
https://doaj.org/article/126533b3133548f09daf4fcf3be4c16b
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:126533b3133548f09daf4fcf3be4c16b
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:126533b3133548f09daf4fcf3be4c16b 2023-05-15T18:32:21+02:00 Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms P. Hagenmuller M. Matzl G. Chambon M. Schneebeli 2016-05-01 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1039-2016 http://www.the-cryosphere.net/10/1039/2016/tc-10-1039-2016.pdf https://doaj.org/article/126533b3133548f09daf4fcf3be4c16b en eng Copernicus Publications 1994-0416 1994-0424 doi:10.5194/tc-10-1039-2016 http://www.the-cryosphere.net/10/1039/2016/tc-10-1039-2016.pdf https://doaj.org/article/126533b3133548f09daf4fcf3be4c16b undefined The Cryosphere, Vol 10, Iss 3, Pp 1039-1054 (2016) geo info Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2016 fttriple https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1039-2016 2023-01-22T18:10:16Z Microtomography can measure the X-ray attenuation coefficient in a 3-D volume of snow with a spatial resolution of a few microns. In order to extract quantitative characteristics of the microstructure, such as the specific surface area (SSA), from these data, the greyscale image first needs to be segmented into a binary image of ice and air. Different numerical algorithms can then be used to compute the surface area of the binary image. In this paper, we report on the effect of commonly used segmentation and surface area computation techniques on the evaluation of density and specific surface area. The evaluation is based on a set of 38 X-ray tomographies of different snow samples without impregnation, scanned with an effective voxel size of 10 and 18 μm. We found that different surface area computation methods can induce relative variations up to 5 % in the density and SSA values. Regarding segmentation, similar results were obtained by sequential and energy-based approaches, provided the associated parameters were correctly chosen. The voxel size also appears to affect the values of density and SSA, but because images with the higher resolution also show the higher noise level, it was not possible to draw a definitive conclusion on this effect of resolution. Article in Journal/Newspaper The Cryosphere Unknown The Cryosphere 10 3 1039 1054
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic geo
info
spellingShingle geo
info
P. Hagenmuller
M. Matzl
G. Chambon
M. Schneebeli
Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms
topic_facet geo
info
description Microtomography can measure the X-ray attenuation coefficient in a 3-D volume of snow with a spatial resolution of a few microns. In order to extract quantitative characteristics of the microstructure, such as the specific surface area (SSA), from these data, the greyscale image first needs to be segmented into a binary image of ice and air. Different numerical algorithms can then be used to compute the surface area of the binary image. In this paper, we report on the effect of commonly used segmentation and surface area computation techniques on the evaluation of density and specific surface area. The evaluation is based on a set of 38 X-ray tomographies of different snow samples without impregnation, scanned with an effective voxel size of 10 and 18 μm. We found that different surface area computation methods can induce relative variations up to 5 % in the density and SSA values. Regarding segmentation, similar results were obtained by sequential and energy-based approaches, provided the associated parameters were correctly chosen. The voxel size also appears to affect the values of density and SSA, but because images with the higher resolution also show the higher noise level, it was not possible to draw a definitive conclusion on this effect of resolution.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author P. Hagenmuller
M. Matzl
G. Chambon
M. Schneebeli
author_facet P. Hagenmuller
M. Matzl
G. Chambon
M. Schneebeli
author_sort P. Hagenmuller
title Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms
title_short Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms
title_full Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms
title_fullStr Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms
title_sort sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1039-2016
http://www.the-cryosphere.net/10/1039/2016/tc-10-1039-2016.pdf
https://doaj.org/article/126533b3133548f09daf4fcf3be4c16b
genre The Cryosphere
genre_facet The Cryosphere
op_source The Cryosphere, Vol 10, Iss 3, Pp 1039-1054 (2016)
op_relation 1994-0416
1994-0424
doi:10.5194/tc-10-1039-2016
http://www.the-cryosphere.net/10/1039/2016/tc-10-1039-2016.pdf
https://doaj.org/article/126533b3133548f09daf4fcf3be4c16b
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1039-2016
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 10
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1039
op_container_end_page 1054
_version_ 1766216463718285312