Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets

An assessment of the risks of a seasonally ice-free Arctic at 1.5 and 2.0 °C global warming above pre-industrial levels is undertaken using model simulations with solar radiation management to achieve the desired temperatures. An ensemble of the CMIP5 model HadGEM2-ES uses solar radiation management...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: J. K. Ridley, E. W. Blockley
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018
https://www.the-cryosphere.net/12/3355/2018/tc-12-3355-2018.pdf
https://doaj.org/article/1053b1025252439297f7ae709f732564
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:1053b1025252439297f7ae709f732564
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:1053b1025252439297f7ae709f732564 2023-05-15T14:45:32+02:00 Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets J. K. Ridley E. W. Blockley 2018-10-01 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018 https://www.the-cryosphere.net/12/3355/2018/tc-12-3355-2018.pdf https://doaj.org/article/1053b1025252439297f7ae709f732564 en eng Copernicus Publications doi:10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018 1994-0416 1994-0424 https://www.the-cryosphere.net/12/3355/2018/tc-12-3355-2018.pdf https://doaj.org/article/1053b1025252439297f7ae709f732564 undefined The Cryosphere, Vol 12, Pp 3355-3360 (2018) envir geo Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2018 fttriple https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018 2023-01-22T18:03:24Z An assessment of the risks of a seasonally ice-free Arctic at 1.5 and 2.0 °C global warming above pre-industrial levels is undertaken using model simulations with solar radiation management to achieve the desired temperatures. An ensemble of the CMIP5 model HadGEM2-ES uses solar radiation management (SRM) to achieve the desired global mean temperatures. It is found that the risk for a seasonally ice-free Arctic is reduced for a target temperature for global warming of 1.5 °C (0.1 %) compared to 2.0 °C (42 %), in general agreement with other methodologies. The SRM produced more ice loss, for a specified global temperature, than for CO2 mitigation scenarios, as SRM produces a higher polar amplification. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Global warming Sea ice The Cryosphere Unknown Arctic The Cryosphere 12 10 3355 3360
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic envir
geo
spellingShingle envir
geo
J. K. Ridley
E. W. Blockley
Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
topic_facet envir
geo
description An assessment of the risks of a seasonally ice-free Arctic at 1.5 and 2.0 °C global warming above pre-industrial levels is undertaken using model simulations with solar radiation management to achieve the desired temperatures. An ensemble of the CMIP5 model HadGEM2-ES uses solar radiation management (SRM) to achieve the desired global mean temperatures. It is found that the risk for a seasonally ice-free Arctic is reduced for a target temperature for global warming of 1.5 °C (0.1 %) compared to 2.0 °C (42 %), in general agreement with other methodologies. The SRM produced more ice loss, for a specified global temperature, than for CO2 mitigation scenarios, as SRM produces a higher polar amplification.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author J. K. Ridley
E. W. Blockley
author_facet J. K. Ridley
E. W. Blockley
author_sort J. K. Ridley
title Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_short Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_full Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_fullStr Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_full_unstemmed Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_sort brief communication: solar radiation management not as effective as co2 mitigation for arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °c cop climate targets
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018
https://www.the-cryosphere.net/12/3355/2018/tc-12-3355-2018.pdf
https://doaj.org/article/1053b1025252439297f7ae709f732564
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Global warming
Sea ice
The Cryosphere
genre_facet Arctic
Global warming
Sea ice
The Cryosphere
op_source The Cryosphere, Vol 12, Pp 3355-3360 (2018)
op_relation doi:10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018
1994-0416
1994-0424
https://www.the-cryosphere.net/12/3355/2018/tc-12-3355-2018.pdf
https://doaj.org/article/1053b1025252439297f7ae709f732564
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 12
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3355
op_container_end_page 3360
_version_ 1766316931459055616