Pedestrian Road Crossing at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Locations: Does the Refuge Island Increase Risk?

The study investigates the behaviour of pedestrians crossing a road with a refuge island in an urban area to assess whether refuge islands deliver their expected benefit. This type of pedestrian crossings aim at providing a half-way shelter and protection while pedestrians are crossing a road with t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability
Main Authors: Wafaa Saleh, Monika Grigorova, Samia Elattar
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124891
https://doaj.org/article/05c338065d4643afb1c54f50e3730aef
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:05c338065d4643afb1c54f50e3730aef
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:05c338065d4643afb1c54f50e3730aef 2023-05-15T18:06:13+02:00 Pedestrian Road Crossing at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Locations: Does the Refuge Island Increase Risk? Wafaa Saleh Monika Grigorova Samia Elattar 2020-06-01 https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124891 https://doaj.org/article/05c338065d4643afb1c54f50e3730aef en eng MDPI AG doi:10.3390/su12124891 2071-1050 https://doaj.org/article/05c338065d4643afb1c54f50e3730aef undefined Sustainability, Vol 12, Iss 4891, p 4891 (2020) refuge islands pedestrian crossing behaviour risk of crossing generalised estimating equations multiple linear regression geo demo Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2020 fttriple https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124891 2023-01-22T19:13:37Z The study investigates the behaviour of pedestrians crossing a road with a refuge island in an urban area to assess whether refuge islands deliver their expected benefit. This type of pedestrian crossings aim at providing a half-way shelter and protection while pedestrians are crossing a road with two-traffic streams. Data has been collected using two video cameras from an urban location in Edinburgh on gaps in traffic flow, rejected and accepted gaps, and critical gaps of pedestrians while crossing from the curb or the median. Data have also been examined to estimate and assess vehicle and pedestrians’ speeds, vehicle type, waiting time, group size and other demographic characteristics of pedestrians. The statistical modelling techniques used include Multiple Linear Regression and Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE). The results show that the critical gap for crossing from the median to the curb is much shorter than that from the curb to the median. Pedestrians appear to be less cautious when crossing from the median to the curb as they are more likely to accept a shorter gap in traffic. This could indicate a shortfall in the design and/or operation of this type of crossing. Further considerations and investigations of what measures could be implemented to enhance safety and reduce risky behaviour at this type of crossing are recommended and certainly encouraged. Article in Journal/Newspaper Refuge Islands Unknown Refuge Islands ENVELOPE(-67.166,-67.166,-68.350,-68.350) Refuge Island ENVELOPE(-132.307,-132.307,54.112,54.112) Sustainability 12 12 4891
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic refuge islands
pedestrian crossing behaviour
risk of crossing
generalised estimating equations
multiple linear regression
geo
demo
spellingShingle refuge islands
pedestrian crossing behaviour
risk of crossing
generalised estimating equations
multiple linear regression
geo
demo
Wafaa Saleh
Monika Grigorova
Samia Elattar
Pedestrian Road Crossing at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Locations: Does the Refuge Island Increase Risk?
topic_facet refuge islands
pedestrian crossing behaviour
risk of crossing
generalised estimating equations
multiple linear regression
geo
demo
description The study investigates the behaviour of pedestrians crossing a road with a refuge island in an urban area to assess whether refuge islands deliver their expected benefit. This type of pedestrian crossings aim at providing a half-way shelter and protection while pedestrians are crossing a road with two-traffic streams. Data has been collected using two video cameras from an urban location in Edinburgh on gaps in traffic flow, rejected and accepted gaps, and critical gaps of pedestrians while crossing from the curb or the median. Data have also been examined to estimate and assess vehicle and pedestrians’ speeds, vehicle type, waiting time, group size and other demographic characteristics of pedestrians. The statistical modelling techniques used include Multiple Linear Regression and Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE). The results show that the critical gap for crossing from the median to the curb is much shorter than that from the curb to the median. Pedestrians appear to be less cautious when crossing from the median to the curb as they are more likely to accept a shorter gap in traffic. This could indicate a shortfall in the design and/or operation of this type of crossing. Further considerations and investigations of what measures could be implemented to enhance safety and reduce risky behaviour at this type of crossing are recommended and certainly encouraged.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Wafaa Saleh
Monika Grigorova
Samia Elattar
author_facet Wafaa Saleh
Monika Grigorova
Samia Elattar
author_sort Wafaa Saleh
title Pedestrian Road Crossing at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Locations: Does the Refuge Island Increase Risk?
title_short Pedestrian Road Crossing at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Locations: Does the Refuge Island Increase Risk?
title_full Pedestrian Road Crossing at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Locations: Does the Refuge Island Increase Risk?
title_fullStr Pedestrian Road Crossing at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Locations: Does the Refuge Island Increase Risk?
title_full_unstemmed Pedestrian Road Crossing at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Locations: Does the Refuge Island Increase Risk?
title_sort pedestrian road crossing at uncontrolled mid-block locations: does the refuge island increase risk?
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124891
https://doaj.org/article/05c338065d4643afb1c54f50e3730aef
long_lat ENVELOPE(-67.166,-67.166,-68.350,-68.350)
ENVELOPE(-132.307,-132.307,54.112,54.112)
geographic Refuge Islands
Refuge Island
geographic_facet Refuge Islands
Refuge Island
genre Refuge Islands
genre_facet Refuge Islands
op_source Sustainability, Vol 12, Iss 4891, p 4891 (2020)
op_relation doi:10.3390/su12124891
2071-1050
https://doaj.org/article/05c338065d4643afb1c54f50e3730aef
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124891
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 12
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4891
_version_ 1766177821041885184