Commentaries on the Decision in the Case “Whaling in the Antárctic”, Australia v. Japan
This article has as its objective the analysis of the decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the case “Whaling in the Antarctic”, Australia v. Japan (New Zealand Intervenor), particularly in respect to how it arose, the development of the controversy and how the case would become a...
Published in: | Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional - ACDI |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English Spanish French |
Published: |
Universidad del Rosario
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.12804/acdi9.1.2016.03 https://doaj.org/article/00b4413f4e664333ba3cedef1bc99e12 |
id |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:00b4413f4e664333ba3cedef1bc99e12 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:oai:doaj.org/article:00b4413f4e664333ba3cedef1bc99e12 2023-05-15T14:00:08+02:00 Commentaries on the Decision in the Case “Whaling in the Antárctic”, Australia v. Japan Fernando Villamizar Lamus 2016-01-01 https://doi.org/10.12804/acdi9.1.2016.03 https://doaj.org/article/00b4413f4e664333ba3cedef1bc99e12 en es fr eng spa fre Universidad del Rosario 2027-1131 2145-4493 doi:10.12804/acdi9.1.2016.03 https://doaj.org/article/00b4413f4e664333ba3cedef1bc99e12 undefined ACDI: Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional, Vol 9, Iss 0, Pp 81-112 (2016) caza de ballenas en la Antártida Corte Internacional de Justicia rol de los peritos estándar de revisión artículo viii Convención Internacional para la Regulación de la Caza de Ballenas droit geo Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2016 fttriple https://doi.org/10.12804/acdi9.1.2016.03 2023-01-22T19:35:19Z This article has as its objective the analysis of the decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the case “Whaling in the Antarctic”, Australia v. Japan (New Zealand Intervenor), particularly in respect to how it arose, the development of the controversy and how the case would become a milestone in the role of experts in cases brought before the ICJ because, with the posture taken to avoid non-transparent practices or ones which could affect proper processes. It also analyzes the standard of review set by the ICJ for the determination of what is or is not science. It demonstrates how this standard could allow inconsistencies which could arise in the decision itself, and suggests other, more precise, methods considered by the ICJ which could overcome the problems of this standard of revision Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antártida Unknown Antarctic The Antarctic New Zealand Ballenas ENVELOPE(-64.167,-64.167,-65.183,-65.183) Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional - ACDI 9 1 81 112 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
fttriple |
language |
English Spanish French |
topic |
caza de ballenas en la Antártida Corte Internacional de Justicia rol de los peritos estándar de revisión artículo viii Convención Internacional para la Regulación de la Caza de Ballenas droit geo |
spellingShingle |
caza de ballenas en la Antártida Corte Internacional de Justicia rol de los peritos estándar de revisión artículo viii Convención Internacional para la Regulación de la Caza de Ballenas droit geo Fernando Villamizar Lamus Commentaries on the Decision in the Case “Whaling in the Antárctic”, Australia v. Japan |
topic_facet |
caza de ballenas en la Antártida Corte Internacional de Justicia rol de los peritos estándar de revisión artículo viii Convención Internacional para la Regulación de la Caza de Ballenas droit geo |
description |
This article has as its objective the analysis of the decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the case “Whaling in the Antarctic”, Australia v. Japan (New Zealand Intervenor), particularly in respect to how it arose, the development of the controversy and how the case would become a milestone in the role of experts in cases brought before the ICJ because, with the posture taken to avoid non-transparent practices or ones which could affect proper processes. It also analyzes the standard of review set by the ICJ for the determination of what is or is not science. It demonstrates how this standard could allow inconsistencies which could arise in the decision itself, and suggests other, more precise, methods considered by the ICJ which could overcome the problems of this standard of revision |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Fernando Villamizar Lamus |
author_facet |
Fernando Villamizar Lamus |
author_sort |
Fernando Villamizar Lamus |
title |
Commentaries on the Decision in the Case “Whaling in the Antárctic”, Australia v. Japan |
title_short |
Commentaries on the Decision in the Case “Whaling in the Antárctic”, Australia v. Japan |
title_full |
Commentaries on the Decision in the Case “Whaling in the Antárctic”, Australia v. Japan |
title_fullStr |
Commentaries on the Decision in the Case “Whaling in the Antárctic”, Australia v. Japan |
title_full_unstemmed |
Commentaries on the Decision in the Case “Whaling in the Antárctic”, Australia v. Japan |
title_sort |
commentaries on the decision in the case “whaling in the antárctic”, australia v. japan |
publisher |
Universidad del Rosario |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.12804/acdi9.1.2016.03 https://doaj.org/article/00b4413f4e664333ba3cedef1bc99e12 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-64.167,-64.167,-65.183,-65.183) |
geographic |
Antarctic The Antarctic New Zealand Ballenas |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic The Antarctic New Zealand Ballenas |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antártida |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antártida |
op_source |
ACDI: Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional, Vol 9, Iss 0, Pp 81-112 (2016) |
op_relation |
2027-1131 2145-4493 doi:10.12804/acdi9.1.2016.03 https://doaj.org/article/00b4413f4e664333ba3cedef1bc99e12 |
op_rights |
undefined |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.12804/acdi9.1.2016.03 |
container_title |
Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional - ACDI |
container_volume |
9 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
81 |
op_container_end_page |
112 |
_version_ |
1766269122858975232 |