Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment

This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy.

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eerola, Aleksi, Reuchamps, Min, International seminar ‘The Contribution of the Constitution to the Protection of human Rights’
Other Authors: UCL - SSH/SPLE - Institut de sciences politiques Louvain-Europe
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
scipo
hisphilso
Iceland
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/218610
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/218610
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/218610 2023-05-15T16:46:46+02:00 Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment Eerola, Aleksi Reuchamps, Min International seminar ‘The Contribution of the Constitution to the Protection of human Rights’ UCL - SSH/SPLE - Institut de sciences politiques Louvain-Europe 2016-01-01 http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/218610 en eng boreal:218610 http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/218610 other Dépôt Institutionnel de l'Académie Louvain scipo hisphilso Conference Output https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_c94f/ 2016 fttriple 2023-01-22T18:51:00Z This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy. Other/Unknown Material Iceland Unknown
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic scipo
hisphilso
spellingShingle scipo
hisphilso
Eerola, Aleksi
Reuchamps, Min
International seminar ‘The Contribution of the Constitution to the Protection of human Rights’
Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment
topic_facet scipo
hisphilso
description This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy.
author2 UCL - SSH/SPLE - Institut de sciences politiques Louvain-Europe
format Other/Unknown Material
author Eerola, Aleksi
Reuchamps, Min
International seminar ‘The Contribution of the Constitution to the Protection of human Rights’
author_facet Eerola, Aleksi
Reuchamps, Min
International seminar ‘The Contribution of the Constitution to the Protection of human Rights’
author_sort Eerola, Aleksi
title Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment
title_short Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment
title_full Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment
title_fullStr Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment
title_sort constitutional modernization and deliberative democracy: a political science assessment
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/218610
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Dépôt Institutionnel de l'Académie Louvain
op_relation boreal:218610
http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/218610
op_rights other
_version_ 1766036862037655552

Similar Items