Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases
This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy.
Published in: | Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
CAIRN
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3917/riej.077.0319 http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/190230 |
Summary: | This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy. |
---|