Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past

Many sources of uncertainty limit the accuracy of climate projections. Among them, we focus here on the parameter uncertainty, i.e. the imperfect knowledge of the values of many physical parameters in a climate model. Therefore, we use LOVECLIM, a global three-dimensional Earth system model of inter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Climate of the Past
Main Authors: Loutre, M. F., Mouchet, A., Fichefet, T., Goosse, H., Goelzer, H., Huybrechts, P.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-511-2011
https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/7/511/2011/
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:J017Bun98f5jNcviOE_Ge
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:J017Bun98f5jNcviOE_Ge 2023-05-15T17:35:53+02:00 Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past Loutre, M. F. Mouchet, A. Fichefet, T. Goosse, H. Goelzer, H. Huybrechts, P. 2018-09-27 https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-511-2011 https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/7/511/2011/ en eng Copernicus Publications doi:10.5194/cp-7-511-2011 10670/1.8c4ex9 1814-9324 1814-9332 https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/7/511/2011/ undefined Geographica Helvetica - geography eISSN: 1814-9332 envir geo Text https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_18cf/ Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2018 fttriple https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-511-2011 2023-01-22T19:13:02Z Many sources of uncertainty limit the accuracy of climate projections. Among them, we focus here on the parameter uncertainty, i.e. the imperfect knowledge of the values of many physical parameters in a climate model. Therefore, we use LOVECLIM, a global three-dimensional Earth system model of intermediate complexity and vary several parameters within a range based on the expert judgement of model developers. Nine climatic parameter sets and three carbon cycle parameter sets are selected because they yield present-day climate simulations coherent with observations and they cover a wide range of climate responses to doubled atmospheric CO2 concentration and freshwater flux perturbation in the North Atlantic. Moreover, they also lead to a large range of atmospheric CO2 concentrations in response to prescribed emissions. Consequently, we have at our disposal 27 alternative versions of LOVECLIM (each corresponding to one parameter set) that provide very different responses to some climate forcings. The 27 model versions are then used to illustrate the range of responses provided over the recent past, to compare the time evolution of climate variables over the time interval for which they are available (the last few decades up to more than one century) and to identify the outliers and the "best" versions over that particular time span. For example, between 1979 and 2005, the simulated global annual mean surface temperature increase ranges from 0.24 °C to 0.64 °C, while the simulated increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration varies between 40 and 50 ppmv. Measurements over the same period indicate an increase in global annual mean surface temperature of 0.45 °C (Brohan et al., 2006) and an increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration of 44 ppmv (Enting et al., 1994; GLOBALVIEW-CO2, 2006). Only a few parameter sets yield simulations that reproduce the observed key variables of the climate system over the last decades. Furthermore, our results show that the model response, including its ocean component, is strongly ... Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Unknown Climate of the Past 7 2 511 526
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic envir
geo
spellingShingle envir
geo
Loutre, M. F.
Mouchet, A.
Fichefet, T.
Goosse, H.
Goelzer, H.
Huybrechts, P.
Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past
topic_facet envir
geo
description Many sources of uncertainty limit the accuracy of climate projections. Among them, we focus here on the parameter uncertainty, i.e. the imperfect knowledge of the values of many physical parameters in a climate model. Therefore, we use LOVECLIM, a global three-dimensional Earth system model of intermediate complexity and vary several parameters within a range based on the expert judgement of model developers. Nine climatic parameter sets and three carbon cycle parameter sets are selected because they yield present-day climate simulations coherent with observations and they cover a wide range of climate responses to doubled atmospheric CO2 concentration and freshwater flux perturbation in the North Atlantic. Moreover, they also lead to a large range of atmospheric CO2 concentrations in response to prescribed emissions. Consequently, we have at our disposal 27 alternative versions of LOVECLIM (each corresponding to one parameter set) that provide very different responses to some climate forcings. The 27 model versions are then used to illustrate the range of responses provided over the recent past, to compare the time evolution of climate variables over the time interval for which they are available (the last few decades up to more than one century) and to identify the outliers and the "best" versions over that particular time span. For example, between 1979 and 2005, the simulated global annual mean surface temperature increase ranges from 0.24 °C to 0.64 °C, while the simulated increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration varies between 40 and 50 ppmv. Measurements over the same period indicate an increase in global annual mean surface temperature of 0.45 °C (Brohan et al., 2006) and an increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration of 44 ppmv (Enting et al., 1994; GLOBALVIEW-CO2, 2006). Only a few parameter sets yield simulations that reproduce the observed key variables of the climate system over the last decades. Furthermore, our results show that the model response, including its ocean component, is strongly ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Loutre, M. F.
Mouchet, A.
Fichefet, T.
Goosse, H.
Goelzer, H.
Huybrechts, P.
author_facet Loutre, M. F.
Mouchet, A.
Fichefet, T.
Goosse, H.
Goelzer, H.
Huybrechts, P.
author_sort Loutre, M. F.
title Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past
title_short Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past
title_full Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past
title_fullStr Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past
title_sort evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-511-2011
https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/7/511/2011/
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Geographica Helvetica - geography
eISSN: 1814-9332
op_relation doi:10.5194/cp-7-511-2011
10670/1.8c4ex9
1814-9324
1814-9332
https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/7/511/2011/
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-511-2011
container_title Climate of the Past
container_volume 7
container_issue 2
container_start_page 511
op_container_end_page 526
_version_ 1766135174404243456