Data from: Evaluating noninvasive genetic sampling techniques to estimate large carnivore abundance

Monitoring large carnivores is difficult because of intrinsically low densities and can be dangerous if physical capture is required. Noninvasive genetic sampling (NGS) is a safe and cost-effective alternative to physical capture. We evaluated the utility of two NGS methods (scat detection dogs and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mumma, Matthew A., Zieminski, Chris, Fuller, Todd, Mahoney, Shane P., Waits, Lisette P., Fuller, Todd K.
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-vb-v6ff
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n90hg
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:50|dedup_wf_001::e82aa9374d291c545527a3efc1a60dcf
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:50|dedup_wf_001::e82aa9374d291c545527a3efc1a60dcf 2023-05-15T17:22:53+02:00 Data from: Evaluating noninvasive genetic sampling techniques to estimate large carnivore abundance Mumma, Matthew A. Zieminski, Chris Fuller, Todd Mahoney, Shane P. Waits, Lisette P. Fuller, Todd K. 2015-02-18 https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-vb-v6ff https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n90hg undefined unknown Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-vb-v6ff http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n90hg http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n90hg https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n90hg lic_creative-commons 9df1ab88-8e71-412c-91fd-8953221cdbf5 oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:88375 oai:services.nod.dans.knaw.nl:Products/dans:oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:88375 10.5061/dryad.n90hg 10|re3data_____::730f562f9efe8a3b3742d2da510d4335 10|re3data_____::84e123776089ce3c7a33db98d9cd15a8 10|eurocrisdris::fe4903425d9040f680d8610d9079ea14 10|openaire____::9e3be59865b2c1c335d32dae2fe7b254 10|re3data_____::94816e6421eeb072e7742ce6a9decc5f re3data_____::r3d100000044 10|openaire____::081b82f96300b6a6e3d282bad31cb6e2 10|opendoar____::8b6dd7db9af49e67306feb59a8bdc52c Life sciences medicine and health care Medicine Population Ecology abundance CAPWIRE Conservation Biology Wildlife Management Mammals conservation genetics envir stat Dataset https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_ddb1/ 2015 fttriple https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n90hg 2023-01-22T17:22:51Z Monitoring large carnivores is difficult because of intrinsically low densities and can be dangerous if physical capture is required. Noninvasive genetic sampling (NGS) is a safe and cost-effective alternative to physical capture. We evaluated the utility of two NGS methods (scat detection dogs and hair sampling) to obtain genetic samples for abundance estimation of coyotes, black bears and Canada lynx in three areas of Newfoundland, Canada. We calculated abundance estimates using program capwire, compared sampling costs, and the cost/sample for each method relative to species and study site, and performed simulations to determine the sampling intensity necessary to achieve abundance estimates with coefficients of variation (CV) of <10%. Scat sampling was effective for both coyotes and bears and hair snags effectively sampled bears in two of three study sites. Rub pads were ineffective in sampling coyotes and lynx. The precision of abundance estimates was dependent upon the number of captures/individual. Our simulations suggested that ~3.4 captures/individual will result in a < 10% CV for abundance estimates when populations are small (23–39), but fewer captures/individual may be sufficient for larger populations. We found scat sampling was more cost-effective for sampling multiple species, but suggest that hair sampling may be less expensive at study sites with limited road access for bears. Given the dependence of sampling scheme on species and study site, the optimal sampling scheme is likely to be study-specific warranting pilot studies in most circumstances. Genotypes and Capture HistoriesThis file contains all genotypes of individuals captured using hair and scat sampling, along with the number of times each individual was captured and associated study site.CAPWIRE Simulation CodeThis file contains CAPWIRE code and the code required to perform simulations to evaluate the precision of abundance estimates at different sample sizes. Dataset Newfoundland Lynx Unknown Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language unknown
topic Life sciences
medicine and health care
Medicine
Population Ecology
abundance
CAPWIRE
Conservation Biology
Wildlife Management
Mammals
conservation genetics
envir
stat
spellingShingle Life sciences
medicine and health care
Medicine
Population Ecology
abundance
CAPWIRE
Conservation Biology
Wildlife Management
Mammals
conservation genetics
envir
stat
Mumma, Matthew A.
Zieminski, Chris
Fuller, Todd
Mahoney, Shane P.
Waits, Lisette P.
Fuller, Todd K.
Data from: Evaluating noninvasive genetic sampling techniques to estimate large carnivore abundance
topic_facet Life sciences
medicine and health care
Medicine
Population Ecology
abundance
CAPWIRE
Conservation Biology
Wildlife Management
Mammals
conservation genetics
envir
stat
description Monitoring large carnivores is difficult because of intrinsically low densities and can be dangerous if physical capture is required. Noninvasive genetic sampling (NGS) is a safe and cost-effective alternative to physical capture. We evaluated the utility of two NGS methods (scat detection dogs and hair sampling) to obtain genetic samples for abundance estimation of coyotes, black bears and Canada lynx in three areas of Newfoundland, Canada. We calculated abundance estimates using program capwire, compared sampling costs, and the cost/sample for each method relative to species and study site, and performed simulations to determine the sampling intensity necessary to achieve abundance estimates with coefficients of variation (CV) of <10%. Scat sampling was effective for both coyotes and bears and hair snags effectively sampled bears in two of three study sites. Rub pads were ineffective in sampling coyotes and lynx. The precision of abundance estimates was dependent upon the number of captures/individual. Our simulations suggested that ~3.4 captures/individual will result in a < 10% CV for abundance estimates when populations are small (23–39), but fewer captures/individual may be sufficient for larger populations. We found scat sampling was more cost-effective for sampling multiple species, but suggest that hair sampling may be less expensive at study sites with limited road access for bears. Given the dependence of sampling scheme on species and study site, the optimal sampling scheme is likely to be study-specific warranting pilot studies in most circumstances. Genotypes and Capture HistoriesThis file contains all genotypes of individuals captured using hair and scat sampling, along with the number of times each individual was captured and associated study site.CAPWIRE Simulation CodeThis file contains CAPWIRE code and the code required to perform simulations to evaluate the precision of abundance estimates at different sample sizes.
format Dataset
author Mumma, Matthew A.
Zieminski, Chris
Fuller, Todd
Mahoney, Shane P.
Waits, Lisette P.
Fuller, Todd K.
author_facet Mumma, Matthew A.
Zieminski, Chris
Fuller, Todd
Mahoney, Shane P.
Waits, Lisette P.
Fuller, Todd K.
author_sort Mumma, Matthew A.
title Data from: Evaluating noninvasive genetic sampling techniques to estimate large carnivore abundance
title_short Data from: Evaluating noninvasive genetic sampling techniques to estimate large carnivore abundance
title_full Data from: Evaluating noninvasive genetic sampling techniques to estimate large carnivore abundance
title_fullStr Data from: Evaluating noninvasive genetic sampling techniques to estimate large carnivore abundance
title_full_unstemmed Data from: Evaluating noninvasive genetic sampling techniques to estimate large carnivore abundance
title_sort data from: evaluating noninvasive genetic sampling techniques to estimate large carnivore abundance
publisher Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
publishDate 2015
url https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-vb-v6ff
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n90hg
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Newfoundland
Lynx
genre_facet Newfoundland
Lynx
op_source 9df1ab88-8e71-412c-91fd-8953221cdbf5
oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:88375
oai:services.nod.dans.knaw.nl:Products/dans:oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:88375
10.5061/dryad.n90hg
10|re3data_____::730f562f9efe8a3b3742d2da510d4335
10|re3data_____::84e123776089ce3c7a33db98d9cd15a8
10|eurocrisdris::fe4903425d9040f680d8610d9079ea14
10|openaire____::9e3be59865b2c1c335d32dae2fe7b254
10|re3data_____::94816e6421eeb072e7742ce6a9decc5f
re3data_____::r3d100000044
10|openaire____::081b82f96300b6a6e3d282bad31cb6e2
10|opendoar____::8b6dd7db9af49e67306feb59a8bdc52c
op_relation https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-vb-v6ff
http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n90hg
http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n90hg
https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n90hg
op_rights lic_creative-commons
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n90hg
_version_ 1766109799095730176