id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:50|dedup_wf_001::bec46e4892c7c968c225e45e03bb9fe0
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:50|dedup_wf_001::bec46e4892c7c968c225e45e03bb9fe0 2023-05-15T17:22:03+02:00 Doctrine Denis Roy 2014-10-24 http://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rgd/2009-v39-n2-rgd01558/1027072ar.pdf https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rgd/2009-v39-n2-rgd01558/1027072ar.pdf https://doi.org/10.7202/1027072ar https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1027072ar http://www.erudit.org/en/journals/rgd/2009-v39-n2-rgd01558/1027072ar/ https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3568754 https://core.ac.uk/display/59434394 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2095033057 fr fre Éditions Wilson & Lafleur, inc. http://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rgd/2009-v39-n2-rgd01558/1027072ar.pdf https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rgd/2009-v39-n2-rgd01558/1027072ar.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1027072ar https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1027072ar http://www.erudit.org/en/journals/rgd/2009-v39-n2-rgd01558/1027072ar/ https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3568754 https://core.ac.uk/display/59434394 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2095033057 undefined oai:erudit.org:1027072ar 1027072ar 10.7202/1027072ar 2095033057 10|opendoar____::16e6a3326dd7d868cbc926602a61e4d0 10|openaire____::081b82f96300b6a6e3d282bad31cb6e2 10|issn___print::b188a964fe48ebfd0f5c851b3ba47d00 10|openaire____::8ac8380272269217cb09a928c8caa993 10|openaire____::5f532a3fc4f1ea403f37070f59a7a53a Sciences Humaines et Sociales Social Sciences and Humanities Plateau continental exploitation ressources hydrocarbures péréquation souveraineté compétence Continental shelf resources hudrocarbon equalization sovereignty jurisdiction droit scipo Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2014 fttriple https://doi.org/10.7202/1027072ar 2023-01-22T16:52:39Z Judging by their actions—inter-provincial delimitation of the continental shelf, exploitation of continental shelf resources by the provinces of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador exclusively, exclusion from equalization calculations of the totality or part of the revenue generated by these resources—the Government of Canada and the Governments of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador would have us believe that the continental shelf belongs to these two provinces. This is not the case. In fact, contrary to a widespread perception, the continental shelf belongs to no one. International law does not grant coastal States sovereignty over the continental shelf, but rather sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring and exploiting the natural resources of the continental shelf. These rights, born out of a process of political compromise, are recognized as being those of the Federal Government. Thus, the argument most often used to legitimize the exclusion of non-renewable resources from equalization calculations, namely that these resources belong to the provinces, cannot apply to continental shelf resources. The practice in Canada regarding the exploitation of oil and gas resources on the Atlantic continental shelf is, from a legal as well as a political standpoint, all the more surprising given that the Canadian Federation is said to be cemented by the principle of equalization. Par leur comportement — délimitation interprovinciale du plateau continental, exploitation des ressources du plateau continental uniquement par les provinces de la Nouvelle-Écosse et de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador, exclusion du calcul de la péréquation d’une partie ou de la totalité des revenus découlant de ces ressources — le gouvernement fédéral canadien et les gouvernements des provinces de la Nouvelle-Écosse et de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador donnent l’impression que le plateau continental appartient à ces deux provinces. Il n’en est rien. En fait, contrairement à une perception répandue, le plateau continental n’appartient à ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Newfoundland Terre-Neuve Unknown Newfoundland Canada Le Plateau ENVELOPE(70.250,70.250,-49.350,-49.350) Revue générale de droit 39 2 329 377
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language French
topic Sciences Humaines et Sociales
Social Sciences and Humanities
Plateau continental
exploitation
ressources
hydrocarbures
péréquation
souveraineté
compétence
Continental shelf
resources
hudrocarbon
equalization
sovereignty
jurisdiction
droit
scipo
spellingShingle Sciences Humaines et Sociales
Social Sciences and Humanities
Plateau continental
exploitation
ressources
hydrocarbures
péréquation
souveraineté
compétence
Continental shelf
resources
hudrocarbon
equalization
sovereignty
jurisdiction
droit
scipo
Denis Roy
Doctrine
topic_facet Sciences Humaines et Sociales
Social Sciences and Humanities
Plateau continental
exploitation
ressources
hydrocarbures
péréquation
souveraineté
compétence
Continental shelf
resources
hudrocarbon
equalization
sovereignty
jurisdiction
droit
scipo
description Judging by their actions—inter-provincial delimitation of the continental shelf, exploitation of continental shelf resources by the provinces of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador exclusively, exclusion from equalization calculations of the totality or part of the revenue generated by these resources—the Government of Canada and the Governments of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador would have us believe that the continental shelf belongs to these two provinces. This is not the case. In fact, contrary to a widespread perception, the continental shelf belongs to no one. International law does not grant coastal States sovereignty over the continental shelf, but rather sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring and exploiting the natural resources of the continental shelf. These rights, born out of a process of political compromise, are recognized as being those of the Federal Government. Thus, the argument most often used to legitimize the exclusion of non-renewable resources from equalization calculations, namely that these resources belong to the provinces, cannot apply to continental shelf resources. The practice in Canada regarding the exploitation of oil and gas resources on the Atlantic continental shelf is, from a legal as well as a political standpoint, all the more surprising given that the Canadian Federation is said to be cemented by the principle of equalization. Par leur comportement — délimitation interprovinciale du plateau continental, exploitation des ressources du plateau continental uniquement par les provinces de la Nouvelle-Écosse et de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador, exclusion du calcul de la péréquation d’une partie ou de la totalité des revenus découlant de ces ressources — le gouvernement fédéral canadien et les gouvernements des provinces de la Nouvelle-Écosse et de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador donnent l’impression que le plateau continental appartient à ces deux provinces. Il n’en est rien. En fait, contrairement à une perception répandue, le plateau continental n’appartient à ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Denis Roy
author_facet Denis Roy
author_sort Denis Roy
title Doctrine
title_short Doctrine
title_full Doctrine
title_fullStr Doctrine
title_full_unstemmed Doctrine
title_sort doctrine
publisher Éditions Wilson & Lafleur, inc.
publishDate 2014
url http://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rgd/2009-v39-n2-rgd01558/1027072ar.pdf
https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rgd/2009-v39-n2-rgd01558/1027072ar.pdf
https://doi.org/10.7202/1027072ar
https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1027072ar
http://www.erudit.org/en/journals/rgd/2009-v39-n2-rgd01558/1027072ar/
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3568754
https://core.ac.uk/display/59434394
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2095033057
long_lat ENVELOPE(70.250,70.250,-49.350,-49.350)
geographic Newfoundland
Canada
Le Plateau
geographic_facet Newfoundland
Canada
Le Plateau
genre Newfoundland
Terre-Neuve
genre_facet Newfoundland
Terre-Neuve
op_source oai:erudit.org:1027072ar
1027072ar
10.7202/1027072ar
2095033057
10|opendoar____::16e6a3326dd7d868cbc926602a61e4d0
10|openaire____::081b82f96300b6a6e3d282bad31cb6e2
10|issn___print::b188a964fe48ebfd0f5c851b3ba47d00
10|openaire____::8ac8380272269217cb09a928c8caa993
10|openaire____::5f532a3fc4f1ea403f37070f59a7a53a
op_relation http://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rgd/2009-v39-n2-rgd01558/1027072ar.pdf
https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rgd/2009-v39-n2-rgd01558/1027072ar.pdf
http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1027072ar
https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1027072ar
http://www.erudit.org/en/journals/rgd/2009-v39-n2-rgd01558/1027072ar/
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3568754
https://core.ac.uk/display/59434394
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2095033057
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7202/1027072ar
container_title Revue générale de droit
container_volume 39
container_issue 2
container_start_page 329
op_container_end_page 377
_version_ 1766108291487760384