Data from: Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts

Many flying animals use both flapping and gliding flight as part of their routine behaviour. These two kinematic patterns impose conflicting requirements on wing design for aerodynamic efficiency and, in the absence of extreme morphing, wings cannot be optimised for both flight modes. In gliding fli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henningsson, Per, Hedenström, Anders, Bomphrey, Richard J.
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cn252
_version_ 1821782011431354368
author Henningsson, Per
Hedenström, Anders
Bomphrey, Richard J.
author_facet Henningsson, Per
Hedenström, Anders
Bomphrey, Richard J.
author_sort Henningsson, Per
collection Unknown
description Many flying animals use both flapping and gliding flight as part of their routine behaviour. These two kinematic patterns impose conflicting requirements on wing design for aerodynamic efficiency and, in the absence of extreme morphing, wings cannot be optimised for both flight modes. In gliding flight, the wing experiences uniform incident flow and the optimal shape is a high aspect ratio wing with an elliptical planform. In flapping flight, on the other hand, the wing tip travels faster than the root, creating a spanwise velocity gradient. To compensate, the optimal wing shape should taper towards the tip (reducing the local chord) and/or twist from root to tip (reducing local angle of attack). We hypothesised that, if a bird is limited in its ability to morph its wings and adapt its wing shape to suit both flight modes, then a preference towards flapping flight optimization will be expected since this is the most energetically demanding flight mode. We tested this by studying a well-known flap-gliding species, the common swift, by measuring the wakes generated by two birds, one in gliding and one in flapping flight in a wind tunnel. We calculated span efficiency, the efficiency of lift production, and found that the flapping swift had consistently higher span efficiency than the gliding swift. This supports our hypothesis and suggests that even though swifts have been shown previously to increase their lift-to-drag ratio substantially when gliding, the wing morphology is tuned to be more aerodynamically efficient in generating lift during flapping. Since body drag can be assumed to be similar for both flapping and gliding, it follows that the higher total drag in flapping flight compared with gliding flight is primarily a consequence of an increase in wing profile drag due to the flapping motion, exceeding the reduction in induced drag. Vector fields of flapping and gliding swiftsFlow measurements behind swifts (Apus apus) in flapping and gliding flight in the Lund University wind tunnel. The data are in the ...
format Dataset
genre Apus apus
genre_facet Apus apus
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:50|dedup_wf_001::b2b9e7e3be55e00d9907754b009f70f4
institution Open Polar
language unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cn252
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cn252
https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cn252
op_rights lic_creative-commons
op_source oai:services.nod.dans.knaw.nl:Products/dans:oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:85206
10.5061/dryad.cn252
oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:85206
10|eurocrisdris::fe4903425d9040f680d8610d9079ea14
10|openaire____::9e3be59865b2c1c335d32dae2fe7b254
re3data_____::r3d100000044
10|re3data_____::94816e6421eeb072e7742ce6a9decc5f
10|re3data_____::84e123776089ce3c7a33db98d9cd15a8
10|openaire____::081b82f96300b6a6e3d282bad31cb6e2
10|opendoar____::8b6dd7db9af49e67306feb59a8bdc52c
publishDate 2015
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:50|dedup_wf_001::b2b9e7e3be55e00d9907754b009f70f4 2025-01-16T19:47:19+00:00 Data from: Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts Henningsson, Per Hedenström, Anders Bomphrey, Richard J. 2015-02-10 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cn252 undefined unknown http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cn252 https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cn252 lic_creative-commons oai:services.nod.dans.knaw.nl:Products/dans:oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:85206 10.5061/dryad.cn252 oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:85206 10|eurocrisdris::fe4903425d9040f680d8610d9079ea14 10|openaire____::9e3be59865b2c1c335d32dae2fe7b254 re3data_____::r3d100000044 10|re3data_____::94816e6421eeb072e7742ce6a9decc5f 10|re3data_____::84e123776089ce3c7a33db98d9cd15a8 10|openaire____::081b82f96300b6a6e3d282bad31cb6e2 10|opendoar____::8b6dd7db9af49e67306feb59a8bdc52c Life sciences medicine and health care aerodynamics efficiency biomechanics animal locomotion flapping gliding flight wind tunnel particle image velocimetry Apus apus envir geo Dataset https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_ddb1/ 2015 fttriple https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cn252 2023-01-22T17:22:31Z Many flying animals use both flapping and gliding flight as part of their routine behaviour. These two kinematic patterns impose conflicting requirements on wing design for aerodynamic efficiency and, in the absence of extreme morphing, wings cannot be optimised for both flight modes. In gliding flight, the wing experiences uniform incident flow and the optimal shape is a high aspect ratio wing with an elliptical planform. In flapping flight, on the other hand, the wing tip travels faster than the root, creating a spanwise velocity gradient. To compensate, the optimal wing shape should taper towards the tip (reducing the local chord) and/or twist from root to tip (reducing local angle of attack). We hypothesised that, if a bird is limited in its ability to morph its wings and adapt its wing shape to suit both flight modes, then a preference towards flapping flight optimization will be expected since this is the most energetically demanding flight mode. We tested this by studying a well-known flap-gliding species, the common swift, by measuring the wakes generated by two birds, one in gliding and one in flapping flight in a wind tunnel. We calculated span efficiency, the efficiency of lift production, and found that the flapping swift had consistently higher span efficiency than the gliding swift. This supports our hypothesis and suggests that even though swifts have been shown previously to increase their lift-to-drag ratio substantially when gliding, the wing morphology is tuned to be more aerodynamically efficient in generating lift during flapping. Since body drag can be assumed to be similar for both flapping and gliding, it follows that the higher total drag in flapping flight compared with gliding flight is primarily a consequence of an increase in wing profile drag due to the flapping motion, exceeding the reduction in induced drag. Vector fields of flapping and gliding swiftsFlow measurements behind swifts (Apus apus) in flapping and gliding flight in the Lund University wind tunnel. The data are in the ... Dataset Apus apus Unknown
spellingShingle Life sciences
medicine and health care
aerodynamics
efficiency
biomechanics
animal locomotion
flapping
gliding
flight
wind tunnel
particle image velocimetry
Apus apus
envir
geo
Henningsson, Per
Hedenström, Anders
Bomphrey, Richard J.
Data from: Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts
title Data from: Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts
title_full Data from: Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts
title_fullStr Data from: Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts
title_full_unstemmed Data from: Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts
title_short Data from: Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts
title_sort data from: efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts
topic Life sciences
medicine and health care
aerodynamics
efficiency
biomechanics
animal locomotion
flapping
gliding
flight
wind tunnel
particle image velocimetry
Apus apus
envir
geo
topic_facet Life sciences
medicine and health care
aerodynamics
efficiency
biomechanics
animal locomotion
flapping
gliding
flight
wind tunnel
particle image velocimetry
Apus apus
envir
geo
url https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cn252