id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:50|dedup_wf_001::75f8377f26857eb0464ca1a509cb4447
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language unknown
topic Original Research
Climate change
common eider
incubation
life‐history
microclimate
nest shelter
nest site selection
wind
Ecology
Evolution
Behavior and Systematics
Nature and Landscape Conservation
envir
geo
spellingShingle Original Research
Climate change
common eider
incubation
life‐history
microclimate
nest shelter
nest site selection
wind
Ecology
Evolution
Behavior and Systematics
Nature and Landscape Conservation
envir
geo
Sébastien Descamps
Loreleï Guéry
Geir W. Gabrielsen
Christophe Pélabon
Christoffer Høyvik Hilde
Mind the wind: microclimate effects on incubation effort of an arctic seabird.
topic_facet Original Research
Climate change
common eider
incubation
life‐history
microclimate
nest shelter
nest site selection
wind
Ecology
Evolution
Behavior and Systematics
Nature and Landscape Conservation
envir
geo
description The energetic costs of reproduction in birds strongly depend on the climate experienced during incubation. Climate change and increasing frequency of extreme weather events may severely affect these costs, especially for species incubating in extreme environments. In this 3-year study, we used an experimental approach to investigate the effects of microclimate and nest shelter on the incubation effort of female common eiders (Somateria mollissima) in a wild Arctic population. We added artificial shelters to a random selection of nesting females, and compared incubation effort, measured as body mass loss during incubation, between females with and without shelter. Nonsheltered females had a higher incubation effort than females with artificial shelters. In nonsheltered females, higher wind speeds increased the incubation effort, while artificially sheltered females experienced no effect of wind. Although increasing ambient temperatures tended to decrease incubation effort, this effect was negligible in the absence of wind. Humidity had no marked effect on incubation effort. This study clearly displays the direct effect of a climatic variable on an important aspect of avian life-history. By showing that increasing wind speed counteracts the energetic benefits of a rising ambient temperature, we were able to demonstrate that a climatic variable other than temperature may also affect wild populations and need to be taken into account when predicting the effects of climate change. © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sébastien Descamps
Loreleï Guéry
Geir W. Gabrielsen
Christophe Pélabon
Christoffer Høyvik Hilde
author_facet Sébastien Descamps
Loreleï Guéry
Geir W. Gabrielsen
Christophe Pélabon
Christoffer Høyvik Hilde
author_sort Sébastien Descamps
title Mind the wind: microclimate effects on incubation effort of an arctic seabird.
title_short Mind the wind: microclimate effects on incubation effort of an arctic seabird.
title_full Mind the wind: microclimate effects on incubation effort of an arctic seabird.
title_fullStr Mind the wind: microclimate effects on incubation effort of an arctic seabird.
title_full_unstemmed Mind the wind: microclimate effects on incubation effort of an arctic seabird.
title_sort mind the wind: microclimate effects on incubation effort of an arctic seabird.
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1988
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4831427
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.1988
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.1988
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.1988
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.1988
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831427/
https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2351555
https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2388970
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2288581977
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Arctic Population
Climate change
Common Eider
Somateria mollissima
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Population
Climate change
Common Eider
Somateria mollissima
op_source 27099703
10.1002/ece3.1988
oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4831427
oai:ntnuopen.ntnu.no:11250/2388970
2288581977
10|opendoar____::8b6dd7db9af49e67306feb59a8bdc52c
10|openaire____::55045bd2a65019fd8e6741a755395c8c
10|opendoar____::eda80a3d5b344bc40f3bc04f65b7a357
10|openaire____::9e3be59865b2c1c335d32dae2fe7b254
10|opendoar____::5ea1649a31336092c05438df996a3e59
10|openaire____::081b82f96300b6a6e3d282bad31cb6e2
10|doajarticles::13ae4a9d2a75f5bb322f19d8ef599c7c
10|openaire____::8ac8380272269217cb09a928c8caa993
10|openaire____::5f532a3fc4f1ea403f37070f59a7a53a
10|openaire____::806360c771262b4d6770e7cdf04b5c5a
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1988
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4831427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1988
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.1988
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.1988
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.1988
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1988
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.1988
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831427/
https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2351555
https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2388970
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2288581977
op_rights lic_creative-commons
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1988
container_title Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 6
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1914
op_container_end_page 1921
_version_ 1766332673377173504
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:50|dedup_wf_001::75f8377f26857eb0464ca1a509cb4447 2023-05-15T15:00:35+02:00 Mind the wind: microclimate effects on incubation effort of an arctic seabird. Sébastien Descamps Loreleï Guéry Geir W. Gabrielsen Christophe Pélabon Christoffer Høyvik Hilde 2016-02-21 https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1988 http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4831427 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.1988 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.1988 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.1988 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.1988 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831427/ https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2351555 https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2388970 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2288581977 undefined unknown https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1988 http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4831427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1988 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.1988 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.1988 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.1988 https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1988 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.1988 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831427/ https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2351555 https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2388970 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2288581977 lic_creative-commons 27099703 10.1002/ece3.1988 oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4831427 oai:ntnuopen.ntnu.no:11250/2388970 2288581977 10|opendoar____::8b6dd7db9af49e67306feb59a8bdc52c 10|openaire____::55045bd2a65019fd8e6741a755395c8c 10|opendoar____::eda80a3d5b344bc40f3bc04f65b7a357 10|openaire____::9e3be59865b2c1c335d32dae2fe7b254 10|opendoar____::5ea1649a31336092c05438df996a3e59 10|openaire____::081b82f96300b6a6e3d282bad31cb6e2 10|doajarticles::13ae4a9d2a75f5bb322f19d8ef599c7c 10|openaire____::8ac8380272269217cb09a928c8caa993 10|openaire____::5f532a3fc4f1ea403f37070f59a7a53a 10|openaire____::806360c771262b4d6770e7cdf04b5c5a Original Research Climate change common eider incubation life‐history microclimate nest shelter nest site selection wind Ecology Evolution Behavior and Systematics Nature and Landscape Conservation envir geo Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2016 fttriple https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1988 2023-01-22T17:31:50Z The energetic costs of reproduction in birds strongly depend on the climate experienced during incubation. Climate change and increasing frequency of extreme weather events may severely affect these costs, especially for species incubating in extreme environments. In this 3-year study, we used an experimental approach to investigate the effects of microclimate and nest shelter on the incubation effort of female common eiders (Somateria mollissima) in a wild Arctic population. We added artificial shelters to a random selection of nesting females, and compared incubation effort, measured as body mass loss during incubation, between females with and without shelter. Nonsheltered females had a higher incubation effort than females with artificial shelters. In nonsheltered females, higher wind speeds increased the incubation effort, while artificially sheltered females experienced no effect of wind. Although increasing ambient temperatures tended to decrease incubation effort, this effect was negligible in the absence of wind. Humidity had no marked effect on incubation effort. This study clearly displays the direct effect of a climatic variable on an important aspect of avian life-history. By showing that increasing wind speed counteracts the energetic benefits of a rising ambient temperature, we were able to demonstrate that a climatic variable other than temperature may also affect wild populations and need to be taken into account when predicting the effects of climate change. © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Population Climate change Common Eider Somateria mollissima Unknown Arctic Ecology and Evolution 6 7 1914 1921