Data from: Reliability assessment of null allele detection: inconsistencies between and within different methods

Microsatellite loci are widely used in population genetic studies, but the presence of null alleles may lead to biased results. Here, we assessed five methods that indirectly detect null alleles and found large inconsistencies among them. Our analysis was based on 20 microsatellite loci genotyped in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dąbrowski, Michal J., Pilot, Malgorzata, Kruczyk, Marcin, Żmihorski, Michal, Umer, Husen M., Gliwicz, Joanna
Format: Dataset
Language:English
Published: Dryad 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4p41m
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:50|dedup_wf_001::649cd78faead344b9c8e77d52c18e20e
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:50|dedup_wf_001::649cd78faead344b9c8e77d52c18e20e 2023-05-15T18:40:41+02:00 Data from: Reliability assessment of null allele detection: inconsistencies between and within different methods Dąbrowski, Michal J. Pilot, Malgorzata Kruczyk, Marcin Żmihorski, Michal Umer, Husen M. Gliwicz, Joanna 2013-01-01 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4p41m en eng Dryad http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4p41m https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4p41m lic_creative-commons 10.5061/dryad.4p41m oai:services.nod.dans.knaw.nl:Products/dans:oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:84071 oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:84071 10|openaire____::9e3be59865b2c1c335d32dae2fe7b254 10|re3data_____::94816e6421eeb072e7742ce6a9decc5f 10|eurocrisdris::fe4903425d9040f680d8610d9079ea14 10|re3data_____::84e123776089ce3c7a33db98d9cd15a8 10|openaire____::081b82f96300b6a6e3d282bad31cb6e2 re3data_____::r3d100000044 10|opendoar____::8b6dd7db9af49e67306feb59a8bdc52c Rodentia genotypes root vole genotyping errors microsatellite loci Microtus oeconomus Heterozygosity bottleneck simulated genotypes tundra vole Arvicolidae null alleles natural populations Life sciences medicine and health care Northen and Central Europe Asia North America Netherlands envir stat Dataset https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_ddb1/ 2013 fttriple https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4p41m 2023-01-22T17:41:59Z Microsatellite loci are widely used in population genetic studies, but the presence of null alleles may lead to biased results. Here, we assessed five methods that indirectly detect null alleles and found large inconsistencies among them. Our analysis was based on 20 microsatellite loci genotyped in a natural population of Microtus oeconomus sampled during 8 years, together with 1200 simulated populations without null alleles, but experiencing bottlenecks of varying duration and intensity, and 120 simulated populations with known null alleles. In the natural population, 29% of positive results were consistent between the methods in pairwise comparisons, and in the simulated data set, this proportion was 14%. The positive results were also inconsistent between different years in the natural population. In the null-allele-free simulated data set, the number of false positives increased with increased bottleneck intensity and duration. We also found a low concordance in null allele detection between the original simulated populations and their 20% random subsets. In the populations simulated to include null alleles, between 22% and 42% of true null alleles remained undetected, which highlighted that detection errors are not restricted to false positives. None of the evaluated methods clearly outperformed the others when both false-positive and false-negative rates were considered. Accepting only the positive results consistent between at least two methods should considerably reduce the false-positive rate, but this approach may increase the false-negative rate. Our study demonstrates the need for novel null allele detection methods that could be reliably applied to natural populations. Genotypes_dataThe file Genotypes_data.zip contains two folders: Simulated_genotypes, Simulated_genotypes_subpopulations and one .csv file named Microtus_oeconomus_genotypes.csv Dataset Tundra Unknown
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic Rodentia
genotypes
root vole
genotyping errors
microsatellite loci
Microtus oeconomus
Heterozygosity
bottleneck
simulated genotypes
tundra vole
Arvicolidae
null alleles
natural populations
Life sciences
medicine and health care
Northen and Central Europe
Asia
North America
Netherlands
envir
stat
spellingShingle Rodentia
genotypes
root vole
genotyping errors
microsatellite loci
Microtus oeconomus
Heterozygosity
bottleneck
simulated genotypes
tundra vole
Arvicolidae
null alleles
natural populations
Life sciences
medicine and health care
Northen and Central Europe
Asia
North America
Netherlands
envir
stat
Dąbrowski, Michal J.
Pilot, Malgorzata
Kruczyk, Marcin
Żmihorski, Michal
Umer, Husen M.
Gliwicz, Joanna
Data from: Reliability assessment of null allele detection: inconsistencies between and within different methods
topic_facet Rodentia
genotypes
root vole
genotyping errors
microsatellite loci
Microtus oeconomus
Heterozygosity
bottleneck
simulated genotypes
tundra vole
Arvicolidae
null alleles
natural populations
Life sciences
medicine and health care
Northen and Central Europe
Asia
North America
Netherlands
envir
stat
description Microsatellite loci are widely used in population genetic studies, but the presence of null alleles may lead to biased results. Here, we assessed five methods that indirectly detect null alleles and found large inconsistencies among them. Our analysis was based on 20 microsatellite loci genotyped in a natural population of Microtus oeconomus sampled during 8 years, together with 1200 simulated populations without null alleles, but experiencing bottlenecks of varying duration and intensity, and 120 simulated populations with known null alleles. In the natural population, 29% of positive results were consistent between the methods in pairwise comparisons, and in the simulated data set, this proportion was 14%. The positive results were also inconsistent between different years in the natural population. In the null-allele-free simulated data set, the number of false positives increased with increased bottleneck intensity and duration. We also found a low concordance in null allele detection between the original simulated populations and their 20% random subsets. In the populations simulated to include null alleles, between 22% and 42% of true null alleles remained undetected, which highlighted that detection errors are not restricted to false positives. None of the evaluated methods clearly outperformed the others when both false-positive and false-negative rates were considered. Accepting only the positive results consistent between at least two methods should considerably reduce the false-positive rate, but this approach may increase the false-negative rate. Our study demonstrates the need for novel null allele detection methods that could be reliably applied to natural populations. Genotypes_dataThe file Genotypes_data.zip contains two folders: Simulated_genotypes, Simulated_genotypes_subpopulations and one .csv file named Microtus_oeconomus_genotypes.csv
format Dataset
author Dąbrowski, Michal J.
Pilot, Malgorzata
Kruczyk, Marcin
Żmihorski, Michal
Umer, Husen M.
Gliwicz, Joanna
author_facet Dąbrowski, Michal J.
Pilot, Malgorzata
Kruczyk, Marcin
Żmihorski, Michal
Umer, Husen M.
Gliwicz, Joanna
author_sort Dąbrowski, Michal J.
title Data from: Reliability assessment of null allele detection: inconsistencies between and within different methods
title_short Data from: Reliability assessment of null allele detection: inconsistencies between and within different methods
title_full Data from: Reliability assessment of null allele detection: inconsistencies between and within different methods
title_fullStr Data from: Reliability assessment of null allele detection: inconsistencies between and within different methods
title_full_unstemmed Data from: Reliability assessment of null allele detection: inconsistencies between and within different methods
title_sort data from: reliability assessment of null allele detection: inconsistencies between and within different methods
publisher Dryad
publishDate 2013
url https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4p41m
genre Tundra
genre_facet Tundra
op_source 10.5061/dryad.4p41m
oai:services.nod.dans.knaw.nl:Products/dans:oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:84071
oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:84071
10|openaire____::9e3be59865b2c1c335d32dae2fe7b254
10|re3data_____::94816e6421eeb072e7742ce6a9decc5f
10|eurocrisdris::fe4903425d9040f680d8610d9079ea14
10|re3data_____::84e123776089ce3c7a33db98d9cd15a8
10|openaire____::081b82f96300b6a6e3d282bad31cb6e2
re3data_____::r3d100000044
10|opendoar____::8b6dd7db9af49e67306feb59a8bdc52c
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4p41m
https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4p41m
op_rights lic_creative-commons
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4p41m
_version_ 1766230086416072704