The discrimination case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on child welfare services for First Nations children and the Jordan Principle
More First Nations children today are being placed in foster care than the number of students who ever attended residential schools. It is becoming increasingly clear that this problem is caused by inequitable and insufficient federal government funding for child welfare services. In 2007, the First...
id |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:50|dedup_wf_001::44685496c7ecb4377a06d2aaed7d324c |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
fttriple |
language |
unknown |
topic |
transmission langues tahitien francophonie famille école enfants Tahiti languages Tahitian family school children traditional adoption Inuit child aboriginal tradition Social Sciences (miscellaneous) Social Psychology Anthropology éducation mapuche éducation scolaire éducation interculturelle bilingue Mapuche education bilingual intercultural education Sciences Humaines et Sociales Social Sciences and Humanities Premières Nations discrimination droits de la personne First Nations human rights adoption coutumière enfant inuit tradition autochtone scipo droit |
spellingShingle |
transmission langues tahitien francophonie famille école enfants Tahiti languages Tahitian family school children traditional adoption Inuit child aboriginal tradition Social Sciences (miscellaneous) Social Psychology Anthropology éducation mapuche éducation scolaire éducation interculturelle bilingue Mapuche education bilingual intercultural education Sciences Humaines et Sociales Social Sciences and Humanities Premières Nations discrimination droits de la personne First Nations human rights adoption coutumière enfant inuit tradition autochtone scipo droit Sarah Clarke Cindy Blackstock Anne Levesque The discrimination case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on child welfare services for First Nations children and the Jordan Principle |
topic_facet |
transmission langues tahitien francophonie famille école enfants Tahiti languages Tahitian family school children traditional adoption Inuit child aboriginal tradition Social Sciences (miscellaneous) Social Psychology Anthropology éducation mapuche éducation scolaire éducation interculturelle bilingue Mapuche education bilingual intercultural education Sciences Humaines et Sociales Social Sciences and Humanities Premières Nations discrimination droits de la personne First Nations human rights adoption coutumière enfant inuit tradition autochtone scipo droit |
description |
More First Nations children today are being placed in foster care than the number of students who ever attended residential schools. It is becoming increasingly clear that this problem is caused by inequitable and insufficient federal government funding for child welfare services. In 2007, the First Nations Child & Family Caring Society of Canada (the Caring Society) and the Assembly of First Nations filed a complaint concerning two allegations of discrimination. The first allegation concerned a conflict of jurisdiction between the federal and provincial governments that resulted in First Nations children often having to wait to receive vital services or even refused services provided to other children. The second allegation of discrimination concerned the unfair treatment of 163,000 First Nations children in the child welfare system provided on reserves. In both cases, it was alleged that these treatments constituted discriminatory acts prohibited under the Canada Human Rights Act. Over the next six years, the Canadian government spent millions of dollars on numerous unsuccessful attempts to derail the case. The case was nevertheless brought before the Human Rights Tribunal in February 2013; for the first time in Canadian history, the federal government’s liability regarding allegations of discrimination toward First Nations children was examined by a body that could make legally binding decisions and remedial orders. Over the year that followed, the Tribunal heard from over 25 witnesses and examined over 500 evidentiary documents. Internal federal documents that were submitted revealed consistent and systematic discrimination against First Nations children, along with a failure to resolve the problem, even with known solutions at hand. Even while the case was still before the Tribunal, a number of academics and members of First Nations began making parallels between the federal government’s reaction in this case and other cases of discrimination in access to services such as education, policing, health, ... |
author2 |
Centre d'anthropologie culturelle (CANTHEL - EA 4545) Université de Paris (UP) |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Sarah Clarke Cindy Blackstock Anne Levesque |
author_facet |
Sarah Clarke Cindy Blackstock Anne Levesque |
author_sort |
Sarah Clarke |
title |
The discrimination case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on child welfare services for First Nations children and the Jordan Principle |
title_short |
The discrimination case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on child welfare services for First Nations children and the Jordan Principle |
title_full |
The discrimination case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on child welfare services for First Nations children and the Jordan Principle |
title_fullStr |
The discrimination case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on child welfare services for First Nations children and the Jordan Principle |
title_full_unstemmed |
The discrimination case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on child welfare services for First Nations children and the Jordan Principle |
title_sort |
discrimination case before the canadian human rights tribunal on child welfare services for first nations children and the jordan principle |
publisher |
Consortium Erudit |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02994420/file/efg-1156.pdf http://www.amnesty.ca/sites/default/files/upr16_ngo_coalition_submission_for_the_upr_of_canada_october_2012_eng.pdf https://doi.org/10.7202/1039504ar https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1186 http://efg.revues.org/1186 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2588278729 http://efg.revues.org/1156 http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1101 https://doi.org/10.7202/1039498ar https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1156 https://efg.revues.org/1156 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2571715506 https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039504ar http://efg.revues.org/1196 https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039498ar http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1156 http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1186 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02994420 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02994420/document https://doi.org/10.7202/1039503ar https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039503ar https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039501ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1039501ar https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1101 https://efg.revues.org/1101?lang=en https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2572095550 https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1196 https://efg.revues.org/1196?lang=en https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2577542539 http://efg.revues.org/1101 http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1196 |
geographic |
Canada |
geographic_facet |
Canada |
genre |
First Nations inuit Premières Nations |
genre_facet |
First Nations inuit Premières Nations |
op_source |
1039504ar 10.7202/1039504ar 2588278729 oai:revues.org:efg/1156 oai:doaj.org/article:e9d707d409ea49cdaeeadbde48112e6c 1039498ar 10.7202/1039498ar 2571715506 oai:revues.org:efg/1186 oai:erudit.org:1039504ar oai:revues.org:efg/1196 oai:erudit.org:1039498ar oai:doaj.org/article:c90320c705fa41d0af82c6fd28eca5ec oai:doaj.org/article:f4973aea29f64d07aa091595e00e1341 oai:HAL:hal-02994420v1 oai:erudit.org:1039503ar oai:erudit.org:1039501ar 1039503ar 10.7202/1039503ar 2572095550 1039501ar 10.7202/1039501ar 2577542539 oai:revues.org:efg/1101 oai:doaj.org/article:986454181d864044924d630935fd3d98 10|openaire____::081b82f96300b6a6e3d282bad31cb6e2 10|doajarticles::9a16b589b45c5b50606e165f647baeb6 10|openaire____::8ac8380272269217cb09a928c8caa993 10|openaire____::5f532a3fc4f1ea403f37070f59a7a53a 10|openaire____::70e84d0f3d8cbc47d833ef5365dd0e5b 10|driver______::bee53aa31dc2cbb538c10c2b65fa5824 10|opendoar____::16e6a3326dd7d868cbc926602a61e4d0 10|opendoar____::1534b76d325a8f591b52d302e7181331 10|opendoar____::18bb68e2b38e4a8ce7cf4f6b2625768c 10|opendoar____::96da2f590cd7246bbde0051047b0d6f7 10|opendoar____::7e7757b1e12abcb736ab9a754ffb617a 10|openaire____::806360c771262b4d6770e7cdf04b5c5a |
op_relation |
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02994420/file/efg-1156.pdf http://www.amnesty.ca/sites/default/files/upr16_ngo_coalition_submission_for_the_upr_of_canada_october_2012_eng.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1039504ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1039504ar https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1186 http://efg.revues.org/1186 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2588278729 http://efg.revues.org/1156 http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1101 http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1039498ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1039498ar https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1156 https://efg.revues.org/1156 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2571715506 https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039504ar http://efg.revues.org/1196 https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039498ar http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1156 http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1186 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02994420 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02994420/document http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1039503ar https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039503ar https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039501ar http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1039501ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1039503ar https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1101 https://efg.revues.org/1101?lang=en https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2572095550 https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1196 https://efg.revues.org/1196?lang=en https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2577542539 http://efg.revues.org/1101 http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1196 |
op_rights |
lic_creative-commons |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.7202/1039504ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1039498ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1039503ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1039501ar |
container_title |
Enfances, Familles, Générations |
container_issue |
25 |
_version_ |
1766000029441458176 |
spelling |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:50|dedup_wf_001::44685496c7ecb4377a06d2aaed7d324c 2023-05-15T16:14:12+02:00 The discrimination case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on child welfare services for First Nations children and the Jordan Principle Sarah Clarke Cindy Blackstock Anne Levesque Centre d'anthropologie culturelle (CANTHEL - EA 4545) Université de Paris (UP) 2017-01-10 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02994420/file/efg-1156.pdf http://www.amnesty.ca/sites/default/files/upr16_ngo_coalition_submission_for_the_upr_of_canada_october_2012_eng.pdf https://doi.org/10.7202/1039504ar https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1186 http://efg.revues.org/1186 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2588278729 http://efg.revues.org/1156 http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1101 https://doi.org/10.7202/1039498ar https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1156 https://efg.revues.org/1156 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2571715506 https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039504ar http://efg.revues.org/1196 https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039498ar http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1156 http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1186 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02994420 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02994420/document https://doi.org/10.7202/1039503ar https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039503ar https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039501ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1039501ar https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1101 https://efg.revues.org/1101?lang=en https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2572095550 https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1196 https://efg.revues.org/1196?lang=en https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2577542539 http://efg.revues.org/1101 http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1196 undefined unknown Consortium Erudit https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02994420/file/efg-1156.pdf http://www.amnesty.ca/sites/default/files/upr16_ngo_coalition_submission_for_the_upr_of_canada_october_2012_eng.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1039504ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1039504ar https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1186 http://efg.revues.org/1186 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2588278729 http://efg.revues.org/1156 http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1101 http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1039498ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1039498ar https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1156 https://efg.revues.org/1156 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2571715506 https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039504ar http://efg.revues.org/1196 https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039498ar http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1156 http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1186 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02994420 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02994420/document http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1039503ar https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039503ar https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039501ar http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1039501ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1039503ar https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1101 https://efg.revues.org/1101?lang=en https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2572095550 https://journals.openedition.org/efg/1196 https://efg.revues.org/1196?lang=en https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2577542539 http://efg.revues.org/1101 http://journals.openedition.org/efg/1196 lic_creative-commons 1039504ar 10.7202/1039504ar 2588278729 oai:revues.org:efg/1156 oai:doaj.org/article:e9d707d409ea49cdaeeadbde48112e6c 1039498ar 10.7202/1039498ar 2571715506 oai:revues.org:efg/1186 oai:erudit.org:1039504ar oai:revues.org:efg/1196 oai:erudit.org:1039498ar oai:doaj.org/article:c90320c705fa41d0af82c6fd28eca5ec oai:doaj.org/article:f4973aea29f64d07aa091595e00e1341 oai:HAL:hal-02994420v1 oai:erudit.org:1039503ar oai:erudit.org:1039501ar 1039503ar 10.7202/1039503ar 2572095550 1039501ar 10.7202/1039501ar 2577542539 oai:revues.org:efg/1101 oai:doaj.org/article:986454181d864044924d630935fd3d98 10|openaire____::081b82f96300b6a6e3d282bad31cb6e2 10|doajarticles::9a16b589b45c5b50606e165f647baeb6 10|openaire____::8ac8380272269217cb09a928c8caa993 10|openaire____::5f532a3fc4f1ea403f37070f59a7a53a 10|openaire____::70e84d0f3d8cbc47d833ef5365dd0e5b 10|driver______::bee53aa31dc2cbb538c10c2b65fa5824 10|opendoar____::16e6a3326dd7d868cbc926602a61e4d0 10|opendoar____::1534b76d325a8f591b52d302e7181331 10|opendoar____::18bb68e2b38e4a8ce7cf4f6b2625768c 10|opendoar____::96da2f590cd7246bbde0051047b0d6f7 10|opendoar____::7e7757b1e12abcb736ab9a754ffb617a 10|openaire____::806360c771262b4d6770e7cdf04b5c5a transmission langues tahitien francophonie famille école enfants Tahiti languages Tahitian family school children traditional adoption Inuit child aboriginal tradition Social Sciences (miscellaneous) Social Psychology Anthropology éducation mapuche éducation scolaire éducation interculturelle bilingue Mapuche education bilingual intercultural education Sciences Humaines et Sociales Social Sciences and Humanities Premières Nations discrimination droits de la personne First Nations human rights adoption coutumière enfant inuit tradition autochtone scipo droit Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2017 fttriple https://doi.org/10.7202/1039504ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1039498ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1039503ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1039501ar 2023-01-22T17:22:49Z More First Nations children today are being placed in foster care than the number of students who ever attended residential schools. It is becoming increasingly clear that this problem is caused by inequitable and insufficient federal government funding for child welfare services. In 2007, the First Nations Child & Family Caring Society of Canada (the Caring Society) and the Assembly of First Nations filed a complaint concerning two allegations of discrimination. The first allegation concerned a conflict of jurisdiction between the federal and provincial governments that resulted in First Nations children often having to wait to receive vital services or even refused services provided to other children. The second allegation of discrimination concerned the unfair treatment of 163,000 First Nations children in the child welfare system provided on reserves. In both cases, it was alleged that these treatments constituted discriminatory acts prohibited under the Canada Human Rights Act. Over the next six years, the Canadian government spent millions of dollars on numerous unsuccessful attempts to derail the case. The case was nevertheless brought before the Human Rights Tribunal in February 2013; for the first time in Canadian history, the federal government’s liability regarding allegations of discrimination toward First Nations children was examined by a body that could make legally binding decisions and remedial orders. Over the year that followed, the Tribunal heard from over 25 witnesses and examined over 500 evidentiary documents. Internal federal documents that were submitted revealed consistent and systematic discrimination against First Nations children, along with a failure to resolve the problem, even with known solutions at hand. Even while the case was still before the Tribunal, a number of academics and members of First Nations began making parallels between the federal government’s reaction in this case and other cases of discrimination in access to services such as education, policing, health, ... Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations inuit Premières Nations Unknown Canada Enfances, Familles, Générations 25 |