The respect of the rights of indigenous peoples in the Quebec forestry regime: any evolution (1960−2014)?
This article offers a historical overview of the development of the forestry regime with regard to the integration of the rights and interests of indigenous peoples during the period from 1960 to 2014. Using a theoretical framework developed by Hill et al. (2012), we address the issue of power shari...
Published in: | Recherches sociographiques |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | French |
Published: |
Département de sociologie, Faculté des sciences sociales, Université Laval
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar.pdf https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar.pdf https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1034209ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1034209ar https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar/ https://core.ac.uk/display/59442397 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2339903250 |
id |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:50|dedup_wf_001::04374042dae310e12aedf359823ec5c6 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:50|dedup_wf_001::04374042dae310e12aedf359823ec5c6 2023-05-15T16:16:54+02:00 The respect of the rights of indigenous peoples in the Quebec forestry regime: any evolution (1960−2014)? Sara Teitelbaum 2015-12-11 http://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar.pdf https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar.pdf https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1034209ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1034209ar https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar/ https://core.ac.uk/display/59442397 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2339903250 fr fre Département de sociologie, Faculté des sciences sociales, Université Laval http://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar.pdf https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar.pdf https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1034209ar http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1034209ar https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar/ https://core.ac.uk/display/59442397 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2339903250 undefined oai:erudit.org:1034209ar 1034209ar 10.7202/1034209ar 2339903250 10|opendoar____::16e6a3326dd7d868cbc926602a61e4d0 10|openaire____::081b82f96300b6a6e3d282bad31cb6e2 10|issn___print::9a345755b2d3d73f172a7ebb5a28ffa5 10|openaire____::8ac8380272269217cb09a928c8caa993 10|openaire____::5f532a3fc4f1ea403f37070f59a7a53a Sciences Humaines et Sociales Social Sciences and Humanities Droits autochtones Premières Nations politique forestière gestion forestière consultation indigenous rights First Nations forestry regime forest management scipo eco Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2015 fttriple https://doi.org/10.7202/1034209ar 2023-01-22T17:13:29Z This article offers a historical overview of the development of the forestry regime with regard to the integration of the rights and interests of indigenous peoples during the period from 1960 to 2014. Using a theoretical framework developed by Hill et al. (2012), we address the issue of power sharing between the state and indigenous nations before the beginning of the 2000s. The measures implemented during this period can be grouped into three categories: consultation on forest management plans, consultation on policy orientations and economic development through the allocation of small forest tenures. Nevertheless, for most Aboriginal nations, the forestry regime offers little opportunity to influence decisions at a strategic level. Cet article propose un aperçu historique de l’évolution du régime forestier en ce qui concerne l’intégration des droits et intérêts des peuples autochtones pendant la période allant de 1960 à 2014. À l’aide d’un cadre théorique élaboré par Hillet al. (2012), nous abordons la question du partage de pouvoir entre l’État et les nations autochtones. L’analyse révèle une quasi-exclusion des intérêts autochtones avant le début des années 2000. Les mesures mises en place au cours de cette période se ramènent à trois catégories : les consultations sur les plans, les consultations sur les orientations politiques, et le développement économique par l’allocation de petite tenures forestières. Néanmoins, pour la plupart des nations autochtones, le régime forestier offre peu d’occasions d’influencer les décisions à un niveau stratégique. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations Premières Nations Unknown Recherches sociographiques 56 2-3 299 323 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
fttriple |
language |
French |
topic |
Sciences Humaines et Sociales Social Sciences and Humanities Droits autochtones Premières Nations politique forestière gestion forestière consultation indigenous rights First Nations forestry regime forest management scipo eco |
spellingShingle |
Sciences Humaines et Sociales Social Sciences and Humanities Droits autochtones Premières Nations politique forestière gestion forestière consultation indigenous rights First Nations forestry regime forest management scipo eco Sara Teitelbaum The respect of the rights of indigenous peoples in the Quebec forestry regime: any evolution (1960−2014)? |
topic_facet |
Sciences Humaines et Sociales Social Sciences and Humanities Droits autochtones Premières Nations politique forestière gestion forestière consultation indigenous rights First Nations forestry regime forest management scipo eco |
description |
This article offers a historical overview of the development of the forestry regime with regard to the integration of the rights and interests of indigenous peoples during the period from 1960 to 2014. Using a theoretical framework developed by Hill et al. (2012), we address the issue of power sharing between the state and indigenous nations before the beginning of the 2000s. The measures implemented during this period can be grouped into three categories: consultation on forest management plans, consultation on policy orientations and economic development through the allocation of small forest tenures. Nevertheless, for most Aboriginal nations, the forestry regime offers little opportunity to influence decisions at a strategic level. Cet article propose un aperçu historique de l’évolution du régime forestier en ce qui concerne l’intégration des droits et intérêts des peuples autochtones pendant la période allant de 1960 à 2014. À l’aide d’un cadre théorique élaboré par Hillet al. (2012), nous abordons la question du partage de pouvoir entre l’État et les nations autochtones. L’analyse révèle une quasi-exclusion des intérêts autochtones avant le début des années 2000. Les mesures mises en place au cours de cette période se ramènent à trois catégories : les consultations sur les plans, les consultations sur les orientations politiques, et le développement économique par l’allocation de petite tenures forestières. Néanmoins, pour la plupart des nations autochtones, le régime forestier offre peu d’occasions d’influencer les décisions à un niveau stratégique. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Sara Teitelbaum |
author_facet |
Sara Teitelbaum |
author_sort |
Sara Teitelbaum |
title |
The respect of the rights of indigenous peoples in the Quebec forestry regime: any evolution (1960−2014)? |
title_short |
The respect of the rights of indigenous peoples in the Quebec forestry regime: any evolution (1960−2014)? |
title_full |
The respect of the rights of indigenous peoples in the Quebec forestry regime: any evolution (1960−2014)? |
title_fullStr |
The respect of the rights of indigenous peoples in the Quebec forestry regime: any evolution (1960−2014)? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The respect of the rights of indigenous peoples in the Quebec forestry regime: any evolution (1960−2014)? |
title_sort |
respect of the rights of indigenous peoples in the quebec forestry regime: any evolution (1960−2014)? |
publisher |
Département de sociologie, Faculté des sciences sociales, Université Laval |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar.pdf https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar.pdf https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1034209ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1034209ar https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar/ https://core.ac.uk/display/59442397 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2339903250 |
genre |
First Nations Premières Nations |
genre_facet |
First Nations Premières Nations |
op_source |
oai:erudit.org:1034209ar 1034209ar 10.7202/1034209ar 2339903250 10|opendoar____::16e6a3326dd7d868cbc926602a61e4d0 10|openaire____::081b82f96300b6a6e3d282bad31cb6e2 10|issn___print::9a345755b2d3d73f172a7ebb5a28ffa5 10|openaire____::8ac8380272269217cb09a928c8caa993 10|openaire____::5f532a3fc4f1ea403f37070f59a7a53a |
op_relation |
http://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar.pdf https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar.pdf https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1034209ar http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1034209ar https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rs/2015-v56-n2-3-rs02285/1034209ar/ https://core.ac.uk/display/59442397 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2339903250 |
op_rights |
undefined |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.7202/1034209ar |
container_title |
Recherches sociographiques |
container_volume |
56 |
container_issue |
2-3 |
container_start_page |
299 |
op_container_end_page |
323 |
_version_ |
1766002756916609024 |