Quantifying grizzly bear habitat selection in a human disturbed landscape

Graduate Understanding the use of habitat by large carnivores in the presence of ever increasing anthropogenic disturbance is crucial to managing threatened species. In the foothills of the Rocky Mountains in west-central Alberta, Canada the grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) faces such disturbance, and is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stewart, Benjamin Peter
Other Authors: Nelson, Trisalyn
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1828/3540
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:3540
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:3540 2023-05-15T18:42:13+02:00 Quantifying grizzly bear habitat selection in a human disturbed landscape Stewart, Benjamin Peter Nelson, Trisalyn 2011-08-31 http://hdl.handle.net/1828/3540 en eng 3540 http://hdl.handle.net/1828/3540 other UVic’s Research and Learning Repository envir scipo Thesis https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_46ec/ 2011 fttriple 2023-01-22T18:20:38Z Graduate Understanding the use of habitat by large carnivores in the presence of ever increasing anthropogenic disturbance is crucial to managing threatened species. In the foothills of the Rocky Mountains in west-central Alberta, Canada the grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) faces such disturbance, and is especially susceptible due to their low fecundity and large home ranges. Grizzly bear mortality increases with proximity to human disturbance, leading to the conclusion that anthropogenic forest disturbance is incompatible with successful grizzly bear habitat The purpose of this research is to evaluate grizzly bear habitat use as it relates to forest disturbance. The general approach was to quantify grizzly bear habitat use and compare to an expectation of use calculated through conditional randomization. The research involved two distinct analyses. First, grizzly bear use of natural edges (transitions between land cover classes) and anthropogenic landscape edges (roads, pipelines, and forest harvests) was quantified and compared between seasons and sex. Females were found to use anthropogenic edges more than natural edges, whereas males used natural edges more. Despite the increased mortality threat arising from increased human access around anthropogenic disturbances, female grizzly bears are using anthropogenic edges more than natural edges, meaning anthropogenic edges may not be incompatible with successful grizzly bear populations. Knowing that female grizzly bears use anthropogenic edges more allows managers to limit access to areas with specific edges desirable to female bears. While creating more disturbances is not the solution to managing for better grizzly bear habitat, limiting human access to areas of beneficial edge could decrease mortality risk. Knowing that grizzly bears use edges, the second analysis quantified use of forest disturbances of varying ages, and determined what disturbance characteristics drive grizzly bear selection of forest disturbances. A 40-year forest disturbance dataset was ... Thesis Ursus arctos Unknown Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic envir
scipo
spellingShingle envir
scipo
Stewart, Benjamin Peter
Quantifying grizzly bear habitat selection in a human disturbed landscape
topic_facet envir
scipo
description Graduate Understanding the use of habitat by large carnivores in the presence of ever increasing anthropogenic disturbance is crucial to managing threatened species. In the foothills of the Rocky Mountains in west-central Alberta, Canada the grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) faces such disturbance, and is especially susceptible due to their low fecundity and large home ranges. Grizzly bear mortality increases with proximity to human disturbance, leading to the conclusion that anthropogenic forest disturbance is incompatible with successful grizzly bear habitat The purpose of this research is to evaluate grizzly bear habitat use as it relates to forest disturbance. The general approach was to quantify grizzly bear habitat use and compare to an expectation of use calculated through conditional randomization. The research involved two distinct analyses. First, grizzly bear use of natural edges (transitions between land cover classes) and anthropogenic landscape edges (roads, pipelines, and forest harvests) was quantified and compared between seasons and sex. Females were found to use anthropogenic edges more than natural edges, whereas males used natural edges more. Despite the increased mortality threat arising from increased human access around anthropogenic disturbances, female grizzly bears are using anthropogenic edges more than natural edges, meaning anthropogenic edges may not be incompatible with successful grizzly bear populations. Knowing that female grizzly bears use anthropogenic edges more allows managers to limit access to areas with specific edges desirable to female bears. While creating more disturbances is not the solution to managing for better grizzly bear habitat, limiting human access to areas of beneficial edge could decrease mortality risk. Knowing that grizzly bears use edges, the second analysis quantified use of forest disturbances of varying ages, and determined what disturbance characteristics drive grizzly bear selection of forest disturbances. A 40-year forest disturbance dataset was ...
author2 Nelson, Trisalyn
format Thesis
author Stewart, Benjamin Peter
author_facet Stewart, Benjamin Peter
author_sort Stewart, Benjamin Peter
title Quantifying grizzly bear habitat selection in a human disturbed landscape
title_short Quantifying grizzly bear habitat selection in a human disturbed landscape
title_full Quantifying grizzly bear habitat selection in a human disturbed landscape
title_fullStr Quantifying grizzly bear habitat selection in a human disturbed landscape
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying grizzly bear habitat selection in a human disturbed landscape
title_sort quantifying grizzly bear habitat selection in a human disturbed landscape
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/1828/3540
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Ursus arctos
genre_facet Ursus arctos
op_source UVic’s Research and Learning Repository
op_relation 3540
http://hdl.handle.net/1828/3540
op_rights other
_version_ 1766231848052064256