Nordic digital identification (eID)

This publication presents the survey results and policy recommendations of a Nordic study of national eID-systems. The countries that have been studied are Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. The aim of the study is to facilitate and lay a foundation for discussions about the similarities...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hansteen, Kjell, Ølnes, Jon, Alvik, Tor
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32729
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12657/32729
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:20.500.12657/32729
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:20.500.12657/32729 2023-05-15T16:49:16+02:00 Nordic digital identification (eID) Hansteen, Kjell Ølnes, Jon Alvik, Tor 2016-01-01 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32729 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12657/32729 en eng 0908-6692 20.500.12657/32729 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32729 undefined OAPEN Library Society and social sciences manag droit Book https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_2f33/ 2016 fttriple https://doi.org/20.500.12657/32729 2023-01-22T16:40:37Z This publication presents the survey results and policy recommendations of a Nordic study of national eID-systems. The countries that have been studied are Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. The aim of the study is to facilitate and lay a foundation for discussions about the similarities and differences in legal, organisational, technical and data approaches taken by the different countries. The survey data has been gathered with the assistance of the members of a project reference group. The data has been analysed and structured into a number of highlighted issues (chapter 1). The highlighted issues have been in turn used as baseline for a set of recommendations (chapter 9). The Nordic Council of Ministers has provided funding and facilitated the staffing of the reference group. The Norwegian Agency for Public Management and e-Government, Difi, has been the project owner and provided project resources. Book Iceland Unknown Norway
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic manag
droit
spellingShingle manag
droit
Hansteen, Kjell
Ølnes, Jon
Alvik, Tor
Nordic digital identification (eID)
topic_facet manag
droit
description This publication presents the survey results and policy recommendations of a Nordic study of national eID-systems. The countries that have been studied are Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. The aim of the study is to facilitate and lay a foundation for discussions about the similarities and differences in legal, organisational, technical and data approaches taken by the different countries. The survey data has been gathered with the assistance of the members of a project reference group. The data has been analysed and structured into a number of highlighted issues (chapter 1). The highlighted issues have been in turn used as baseline for a set of recommendations (chapter 9). The Nordic Council of Ministers has provided funding and facilitated the staffing of the reference group. The Norwegian Agency for Public Management and e-Government, Difi, has been the project owner and provided project resources.
format Book
author Hansteen, Kjell
Ølnes, Jon
Alvik, Tor
author_facet Hansteen, Kjell
Ølnes, Jon
Alvik, Tor
author_sort Hansteen, Kjell
title Nordic digital identification (eID)
title_short Nordic digital identification (eID)
title_full Nordic digital identification (eID)
title_fullStr Nordic digital identification (eID)
title_full_unstemmed Nordic digital identification (eID)
title_sort nordic digital identification (eid)
publishDate 2016
url http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32729
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12657/32729
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source OAPEN Library Society and social sciences
op_relation 0908-6692
20.500.12657/32729
http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32729
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/20.500.12657/32729
_version_ 1766039420876619776