Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods?

In Antarctica, amphipods form a highly diverse group, occupy many different ecological niches and hold an important place in food webs. Here, we aimed to test whether differences in Antarctic amphipod feeding habits were reflected in their mandible morphology, and if mouthpart specialization could b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Authors: Michel, Loic, Nyssen, Fabienne L., Dauby, Patrick, Verheye, Marie
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2020
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102020000395
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00653/76552/77728.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00653/76552/
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:10670/1.wl3xyw
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:10670/1.wl3xyw 2023-05-15T13:32:54+02:00 Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods? Michel, Loic Nyssen, Fabienne L. Dauby, Patrick Verheye, Marie 2020-01-01 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102020000395 https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00653/76552/77728.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00653/76552/ en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) doi:10.1017/S0954102020000395 10670/1.wl3xyw https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00653/76552/77728.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00653/76552/ Archimer, archive institutionnelle de l'Ifremer Antarctic Science (0954-1020) (Cambridge University Press (CUP)), 2020-12 , Vol. 32 , N. 6 , P. 496-507 geo envir Text https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_18cf/ 2020 fttriple https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102020000395 2023-01-22T17:01:08Z In Antarctica, amphipods form a highly diverse group, occupy many different ecological niches and hold an important place in food webs. Here, we aimed to test whether differences in Antarctic amphipod feeding habits were reflected in their mandible morphology, and if mouthpart specialization could be used to describe amphipod trophic ecology. To do so, we compared mandible morphology in nine species spanning seven families and five functional groups (grazers, suspension feeders, generalist predators, specialist predators and scavengers). Mandible morphology adequately depicted some aspects of amphipod trophic ecology, such as the trophic level at which animals feed or their degree of dietary specialization. On the other hand, links between mandible morphology and amphipod diet were seldom unambiguous or straightforward. Similar adaptations were found in distinct functional groups. Conversely, mandible morphology could vary within a single functional group, and phylogenetic effects sometimes complicated the interpretation of form-function relationships. Overall, mandible morphology on its own was generally not sufficient to precisely predict amphipod feeding strategies. However, when combined with other methods (e.g. gut contents, trophic markers), it constitutes a valuable source of information for integrative studies of amphipod ecological diversity in the Southern Ocean. Text Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Antarctica Southern Ocean Unknown Antarctic Southern Ocean Antarctic Science 32 6 496 507
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic geo
envir
spellingShingle geo
envir
Michel, Loic
Nyssen, Fabienne L.
Dauby, Patrick
Verheye, Marie
Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods?
topic_facet geo
envir
description In Antarctica, amphipods form a highly diverse group, occupy many different ecological niches and hold an important place in food webs. Here, we aimed to test whether differences in Antarctic amphipod feeding habits were reflected in their mandible morphology, and if mouthpart specialization could be used to describe amphipod trophic ecology. To do so, we compared mandible morphology in nine species spanning seven families and five functional groups (grazers, suspension feeders, generalist predators, specialist predators and scavengers). Mandible morphology adequately depicted some aspects of amphipod trophic ecology, such as the trophic level at which animals feed or their degree of dietary specialization. On the other hand, links between mandible morphology and amphipod diet were seldom unambiguous or straightforward. Similar adaptations were found in distinct functional groups. Conversely, mandible morphology could vary within a single functional group, and phylogenetic effects sometimes complicated the interpretation of form-function relationships. Overall, mandible morphology on its own was generally not sufficient to precisely predict amphipod feeding strategies. However, when combined with other methods (e.g. gut contents, trophic markers), it constitutes a valuable source of information for integrative studies of amphipod ecological diversity in the Southern Ocean.
format Text
author Michel, Loic
Nyssen, Fabienne L.
Dauby, Patrick
Verheye, Marie
author_facet Michel, Loic
Nyssen, Fabienne L.
Dauby, Patrick
Verheye, Marie
author_sort Michel, Loic
title Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods?
title_short Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods?
title_full Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods?
title_fullStr Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods?
title_full_unstemmed Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods?
title_sort can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in antarctic amphipods?
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102020000395
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00653/76552/77728.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00653/76552/
geographic Antarctic
Southern Ocean
geographic_facet Antarctic
Southern Ocean
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Antarctica
Southern Ocean
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Antarctica
Southern Ocean
op_source Archimer, archive institutionnelle de l'Ifremer
Antarctic Science (0954-1020) (Cambridge University Press (CUP)), 2020-12 , Vol. 32 , N. 6 , P. 496-507
op_relation doi:10.1017/S0954102020000395
10670/1.wl3xyw
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00653/76552/77728.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00653/76552/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102020000395
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 32
container_issue 6
container_start_page 496
op_container_end_page 507
_version_ 1766036898610937856